The Suez Crisis and Dag Hammarskjöld’s mediation: biased or balanced? A view from Cairo

Franco, J. (2023). The Suez Crisis and Dag Hammarskjöld’s mediation: biased or balanced? A view from Cairo. International History Review, https://doi.org/10.1080/07075332.2023.2274098
Copy

This article fuses existing theory on conflict mediation with new historical analysis and underused Arabic-language sources to evaluate Dag Hammarskjöld’s degree of partiality in the Suez Crisis, and the effect of this partiality on the developments. It finds Hammarskjöld was ‘partially partial’: he was partial in his prejudice and conduct, but impartial in his goal. Paradoxically, his ‘partial partiality’ allowed him to influence the policies of both parties effectively.

picture_as_pdf
Download

Export as

EndNote BibTeX Reference Manager Refer Atom Dublin Core JSON Multiline CSV
Export