A systematic review of evidence-based interventions for child and adolescent mental health problems in low- and middle-income countries

Silva Ribeiro, WagnerORCID logo; Grande, Antonio Jose; Scopel Hoffmann, Mauricio; Ziebold, Carolina; McDaid, DavidORCID logo; Fry, Andra; Peixoto, Clayton; de Miranda, Claudio Torres; King, DerekORCID logo; Damiani Tomasi, Cristiane; +7 more...Faustino, Christine; Leone, Sandra; Moraes, Silvia; Schäfer, Antonio Augusto; Alves, Veronica; Ines Rosa, Maria; and Evans-Lacko, SaraORCID logo A systematic review of evidence-based interventions for child and adolescent mental health problems in low- and middle-income countries. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 121: 152358. ISSN 0010-440X
Copy

Background Treatments for mental health problems in childhood and adolescence have advanced in the last 15 years. Despite advances in research, most of the evidence on effective interventions comes from high-income countries, while evidence is scarce in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where 90% of world’s children and adolescents live. The aim of this review was to identify evidence-based interventions tested in LMICs to treat or prevent child and adolescent mental health problems. Methods We conducted a systematic review of seven major electronic databases, from January 2007 to July 2019. We included randomised or non-randomised clinical trials that evaluated interventions for children or adolescents aged 6 to 18 years living in LMICs and who had, or were at risk of developing, one or more mental health problems. Results were grouped according to the studied conditions. Due to the heterogeneity of conditions, interventions and outcomes, we performed a narrative synthesis. The review was registered at PROSPERO under the number CRD42019129376. Findings Of 127,466 references found through our search strategy, 107 studies were included in narrative synthesis after the eligibility verification processes. Nineteen different conditions and nine types of interventions were addressed by studies included in the review. Over 1/3 of studied interventions were superior to comparators, with psychoeducation and psychotherapy having the highest proportion of positive results. One-third of studies were classified as presenting low risk of bias. Interpretation This review shows that different interventions have been effective in LMICs and have the potential to close the mental health care gap among children and adolescents in low-resource settings.

picture_as_pdf

picture_as_pdf
subject
Published Version
Available under Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0

Download

Atom BibTeX OpenURL ContextObject in Span OpenURL ContextObject Dublin Core MPEG-21 DIDL Data Cite XML EndNote HTML Citation METS MODS RIOXX2 XML Reference Manager Refer ASCII Citation
Export

Downloads