Quantification = economization? Numbers, ratings and rankings in the prison service of England and Wales

Guter-Sandu, A.ORCID logo & Mennicken, A.ORCID logo (2021). Quantification = economization? Numbers, ratings and rankings in the prison service of England and Wales. In Mennicken, A. & Salais, R. (Eds.), The New Politics of Numbers: Utopia, Evidence and Democracy (pp. 307 - 336). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78201-6_10
Copy

This paper uses the case of prison privatization in England and Wales to scrutinize what it means to “economize the social” through numbers. It argues that we ought to be careful not to equate quantification with economization. To uncover the multiple effects of economization and quantification brought about by new public management reforms and prison privatization, one needs to set presumed dichotomies between the public and the private aside and turn instead to the multiplicity of economizing practices (curtailing, marketizing, financializing) and their implication in different forms of quantification. Ironically, numbers and state contracts governing privately managed prisons also shielded these establishments from economization (e.g. budgetary savings requests); and it is the public prisons that have been exposed the most to measures of government austerity.

picture_as_pdf

subject
Published Version
Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0

Download

Export as

EndNote BibTeX Reference Manager Refer Atom Dublin Core JSON Multiline CSV
Export