Long read:trump v. thompson shows that when the supreme court weighs in on executive privilege it’s bad for congress, for a sitting president, and for the court.
Tulis, Jeffrey; and Schmitt, Gary J.
(2022)
Long read:trump v. thompson shows that when the supreme court weighs in on executive privilege it’s bad for congress, for a sitting president, and for the court.
[['eprint_typename_blog_post' not defined]]
The US Supreme Court has recently rejected former President Trump’s request to stop the National Archives from releasing White House records from during his tenure. Gary J. Schmitt and Jeffrey K. Tulis look at the recent history of disputes over executive privilege between Congress and the executive, and argue that while hyper-partisanship in the legislature has necessitated the Supreme Court’s involvement in resolving these disagreements, this is not good for Congress – or for the Court.
| Item Type | ['eprint_typename_blog_post' not defined] |
|---|---|
| Departments | LSE |
| Date Deposited | 08 Apr 2022 14:39 |
| URI | https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/114081 |
-
picture_as_pdf -
subject - Published Version
Download this file
Share this file
Downloads