Measuring UK top incomes
We compare two approaches to measuring UK top income shares—the share of income going to particular subgroups, such as the top 1%. We set out four criteria that an ideal top share series should satisfy: (i) comparability between numerator and denominator; (ii) comparability over time; (iii) international comparability; and (iv) practical sustainability. Our preferred approach meets three of these; by contrast the approach currently used to produce UK fiscal income series meets none of them. Changing to our preferred approach matters quantitatively: the share of income going to the top 1% is 2 percentage points higher, but rising more slowly, than under the alternative.
| Item Type | Working paper |
|---|---|
| Keywords | income inequality,measurement,national accounts,top shares |
| Departments | Law School |
| Date Deposited | 04 Feb 2022 11:57 |
| URI | https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/113615 |
Explore Further
- https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/research/centres/cage/ (Publisher)
- https://www.lse.ac.uk/International-Inequalities/People/Arun-Advani (Author)
- https://www.lse.ac.uk/law/people/academic-staff/andrew-summers (Author)
- https://www.lse.ac.uk/International-Inequalities/People/Hannah-Tarrant (Author)
- https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/research/centres/cage/manage/publications/wp490.2021.pdf
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4978-7743