A decade of theory as reflected in Psychological Science (2009-2019)

McPhetres, Jonathon; Albayrak-Aydemir, NihanORCID logo; Mendes, Ana Barbosa; Chow, Elvina C.; Gonzalez-Marquez, Patricio; Loukras, Erin; Maus, Annika; O'Mahony, Aoife; Pomareda, Christina; Primbs, Maximilian A.; +3 more...Sackman, Shalaine L.; Smithson, Conor J.R.; and Volodko, Kirill (2021) A decade of theory as reflected in Psychological Science (2009-2019). PLOS ONE, 16 (3): e0247986. ISSN 1932-6203
Copy

The dominant belief is that science progresses by testing theories and moving towards theoretical consensus. While it's implicitly assumed that psychology operates in this manner, critical discussions claim that the field suffers from a lack of cumulative theory. To examine this paradox, we analysed research published in Psychological Science from 2009-2019 (N = 2,225). We found mention of 359 theories in-text, most were referred to only once. Only 53.66% of all manuscripts included the word theory, and only 15.33% explicitly claimed to test predictions derived from theories. We interpret this to suggest that the majority of research published in this flagship journal is not driven by theory, nor can it be contributing to cumulative theory building. These data provide insight into the kinds of research psychologists are conducting and raises questions about the role of theory in the psychological sciences.

picture_as_pdf

picture_as_pdf
subject
Published Version
Available under Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0

Download

Atom BibTeX OpenURL ContextObject in Span OpenURL ContextObject Dublin Core MPEG-21 DIDL Data Cite XML EndNote HTML Citation METS MODS RIOXX2 XML Reference Manager Refer ASCII Citation
Export

Downloads