Lives v livelihoods, part 2: suppression or control?

Adler, Matthew; Bradley, RichardORCID logo; Ferranna, Maddalena; Fleurbaey, Hélène; Hammitt, James K.; and Voorhoeve, AlexORCID logo (2020) Lives v livelihoods, part 2: suppression or control? [['eprint_typename_blog_post' not defined]]
Copy

Limiting the length of lockdown is key to minimising the damage the pandemic inflicts on livelihoods. Matthew Adler (Duke University/LSE), Richard Bradley (LSE), Maddalena Ferranna (Princeton), Marc Fleurbaey (Princeton and Paris School of Economics), James Hammitt (Harvard) and Alex Voorhoeve (LSE) compare the benefit-cost and social welfare approaches to doing so. They find early suppression is often best, if it can be ensured that those on lower incomes bear a smaller share of the economic burden of lockdown.

picture_as_pdf

picture_as_pdf
subject
Published Version

Download

Atom BibTeX OpenURL ContextObject in Span OpenURL ContextObject Dublin Core MPEG-21 DIDL Data Cite XML EndNote HTML Citation METS MODS RIOXX2 XML Reference Manager Refer ASCII Citation
Export

Downloads