Lives v livelihoods, part 2 suppression or control?
Adler, M., Bradley, R.
, Ferranna, M., Fleurbaey, H., Hammitt, J. K. & Voorhoeve, A.
(11 August 2020)
Lives v livelihoods, part 2 suppression or control?
LSE COVID-19 Blog.
Limiting the length of lockdown is key to minimising the damage the pandemic inflicts on livelihoods. Matthew Adler (Duke University/LSE), Richard Bradley (LSE), Maddalena Ferranna (Princeton), Marc Fleurbaey (Princeton and Paris School of Economics), James Hammitt (Harvard) and Alex Voorhoeve (LSE) compare the benefit-cost and social welfare approaches to doing so. They find early suppression is often best, if it can be ensured that those on lower incomes bear a smaller share of the economic burden of lockdown.
| Item Type | Blog post |
|---|---|
| Copyright holders | © 2020 The Authors |
| Departments | LSE > Academic Departments > Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method |
| Date Deposited | 14 Sep 2020 |
| URI | https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/106336 |
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2184-7844
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3240-3835