Lives v livelihoods, part 2 suppression or control?

Adler, M., Bradley, R.ORCID logo, Ferranna, M., Fleurbaey, H., Hammitt, J. K. & Voorhoeve, A.ORCID logo (11 August 2020) Lives v livelihoods, part 2 suppression or control? LSE COVID-19 Blog.
Copy

Limiting the length of lockdown is key to minimising the damage the pandemic inflicts on livelihoods. Matthew Adler (Duke University/LSE), Richard Bradley (LSE), Maddalena Ferranna (Princeton), Marc Fleurbaey (Princeton and Paris School of Economics), James Hammitt (Harvard) and Alex Voorhoeve (LSE) compare the benefit-cost and social welfare approaches to doing so. They find early suppression is often best, if it can be ensured that those on lower incomes bear a smaller share of the economic burden of lockdown.

picture_as_pdf

subject
Published Version

Download

Export as

EndNote BibTeX Reference Manager Refer Atom Dublin Core JSON Multiline CSV
Export