Resolving challenges to historical research: developing a project to define fair and equitable treatment

Pinchis-Paulsen, M.ORCID logo (2018). Resolving challenges to historical research: developing a project to define fair and equitable treatment. In Schill, S. W., Tams, C. J. & Hofmann, R. (Eds.), International Investment Law and History (pp. 179 - 212). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786439963.00015
Copy

This book chapter presents three methodological challenges stemming from archival research. The chapter reflects upon these challenges and provides solutions based upon personal experiences with legal historical analysis into the ‘fair and equitable treatment’ (FET) clause, found today in most international investment agreements. The chapter proceeds in four parts. Part one discusses the first challenge, which refers to whether historical research can or should be divided into explicit time periods, also known as periodization. Part two examines the second challenge: defining the subject matter of the historical research, and deciding whether international legal history should exclusively focus on law by studying the history of rules and concepts, or whether to look at law in context, studying its practice, and at how legal institutions work. Part three examines the issue of anachronism in legal historical methodology, meaning whether to read the past with knowledge of the present. Part four concludes.

Full text not available from this repository.

Export as

EndNote BibTeX Reference Manager Refer Atom Dublin Core JSON Multiline CSV
Export