The divided we and multiple obligations
Franks, B.
& Stewart, A.
(2020).
The divided we and multiple obligations.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
43,
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X19002553
Tomasello's account of the origins and nature of moral obligation rightly emphasises the key roles of social relations and a cooperative sense of "we." However, we suggest that it overlooks the complexity of those social relations and the resulting prevalence of a divided "we" in moral social groups. We argue that the social identity dynamics that arise can lead to competing obligations in a single group, and this has implications for the evolution of obligation.
| Item Type | Article |
|---|---|
| Copyright holders | © 2020 The Authors |
| Departments | LSE > Academic Departments > Psychological and Behavioural Science |
| DOI | 10.1017/S0140525X19002553 |
| Date Deposited | 13 May 2020 |
| Acceptance Date | 01 Jan 2020 |
| URI | https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/104386 |
Explore Further
- https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85084190793 (Scopus publication)
- http://www.lse.ac.uk/PBS/People/Professor-Bradley-Franks (Author)
- http://www.lse.ac.uk/PBS/People/Andy-Stewart (Author)
- https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/behavioral... (Official URL)
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6667-6172