CRediT check - should we welcome tools to differentiate the contributions made to academic papers?
Gadd, Elizabeth
(2020)
CRediT check - should we welcome tools to differentiate the contributions made to academic papers?
[['eprint_typename_blog_post' not defined]]
Elsevier is the latest in a lengthening list of publishers to announce their adoption for 1,200 journals of the CASRAI Contributor Role Taxonomy (CRediT). Authors of papers in these journals will be required to define their contributions in relation to a predefined taxonomy of 14 roles. In this post, Elizabeth Gadd weighs the pros and cons of defining contributorship in a more prescriptive fashion and asks whether there is a risk of incentivising new kinds of competitive behaviour and forms of evaluation that doesn’t benefit researchers.
| Item Type | ['eprint_typename_blog_post' not defined] |
|---|---|
| Departments | LSE |
| Date Deposited | 10 Mar 2020 13:42 |
| URI | https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/103722 |
-
picture_as_pdf -
subject - Published Version
Download this file
Share this file
Downloads