Trophy architects and design as rent-seeking: quantifying deadweight losses in a tightly regulated office market
Britain tightly restricts the supply of office space, creating substantial economic rents, but its development restrictions are politically administered and therefore gameable, inducing rent-seeking activity. We find that ‘trophy architects’ (TAs)—prior winners of a lifetime achievement award—obtain more space on a given site apparently by signalling architectural merit. Analysis of 2039 office buildings shows that TAs build 14 stories taller, thereby increasing a representative site value by 152% and capturing potential economic rents of £148m. However, we argue that this apparent premium is merely compensation for the extra costs, risks and delays of using a TA to game the planning system; it is therefore an indirect measure of the deadweight costs of this form of rent-seeking.
| Item Type | Article |
|---|---|
| Copyright holders | © 2020 The London School of Economics and Political Science |
| Departments | LSE > Academic Departments > Geography and Environment |
| DOI | 10.1111/ecca.12339 |
| Date Deposited | 20 Jan 2020 |
| Acceptance Date | 19 Jan 2020 |
| URI | https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/103134 |
Explore Further
- http://www.lse.ac.uk/geography-and-environment/people/academic-staff/paul-cheshire (Author)
- https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85081742057 (Scopus publication)
- https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/14680335 (Official URL)