The consequences of treating electricity as a right

Burgess, R.ORCID logo, Greenstone, M., Ryan, N. & Sudarshan, A. (2020). The consequences of treating electricity as a right. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 34(1), 145 - 169. https://doi.org/10.1257/JEP.34.1.145
Copy

This paper seeks to explain why billions of people in developing countries either have no access to electricity or lack a reliable supply. We present evidence that these shortfalls are a consequence of electricity being treated as a right and that this sets off a vicious four-step circle. In step 1, because a social norm has developed that all deserve power independent of payment, subsidies, theft, and nonpayment are widely tolerated. In step 2, electricity distribution companies lose money with each unit of electricity sold and in total lose large sums of money. In step 3, government-owned distribution companies ration supply to limit losses by restricting access and hours of supply. In step 4, power supply is no longer governed by market forces and the link between payment and supply is severed, thus reducing customers' incentives to pay. The equilibrium outcome is uneven and sporadic access that undermines growth.

picture_as_pdf

picture_as_pdf
electricity_is_not_a_right_20190401.pdf
subject
Accepted Version

Download
picture_as_pdf

picture_as_pdf
The_consequences_of_treating_electricity_as_a_right_.pdf
subject
Accepted Version

Download

Export as

EndNote BibTeX Reference Manager Refer Atom Dublin Core JSON Multiline CSV
Export