Individual differences in hyper-realistic mask detection
Hyper-realistic masks present a new challenge to security and crime prevention. We have recently shown that people’s ability to differentiate these masks from real faces is extremely limited. Here we consider individual differences as a means to improve mask detection. Participants categorized single images as masks or real faces in a computer-based task. Experiment 1 revealed poor accuracy (40%) and large individual differences (5–100%) for high-realism masks among low-realism masks and real faces. Individual differences in mask categorization accuracy remained large when the Low-realism condition was eliminated (Experiment 2). Accuracy for mask images was not correlated with accuracy for real face images or with prior knowledge of hyper-realistic face masks. Image analysis revealed that mask and face stimuli were most strongly differentiated in the region below the eyes. Moreover, high-performing participants tracked the differential information in this area, but low-performing participants did not. Like other face tasks (e.g. identification), hyper-realistic mask detection gives rise to large individual differences in performance. Unlike many other face tasks, performance may be localized to a specific image cue.
| Item Type | Article |
|---|---|
| Copyright holders | © 2018 The Authors |
| Keywords | masks, disguise, face perception, face detection, face recognition, deception, fraud, passports, performance enhancement, individual differences |
| Departments | Psychological and Behavioural Science |
| DOI | 10.1186/s41235-018-0118-3 |
| Date Deposited | 19 Aug 2019 14:54 |
| Acceptance Date | 2018-05-31 |
| URI | https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/101394 |
