Uninsured by choice? A choice experiment on long term care insurance
We examine evidence from two unique discrete choice experiments (DCE) on long term care insurance and values several of its relevant attributes. More specifically, the experiments examine choices made by a large sample made of 15,298 individuals in the United States with and without insurance. We study the valuation of a number of insurance attributes, namely the daily insurance benefit, insurance coverage, the compulsory and voluntary nature of the insurance policy design, alongside the costs (insurance premium) and health requirements. This paper elicits both respondents’ preferences and willingness to pay (WTP) for these care insurance's attributes using a random parameter logit model, and assesses the heterogeneity of choice responses using demographic, socioeconomic and attitudinal motivations to segment response to insurance choices. We find that an increase in the insurance premium by an additional $100 would reduce insurance uptake by 1pp. Insurance policy uptake is higher when it provides benefits for the lifetime (the monthly marginal WTP being $178.64), and voluntary (the monthly marginal WTP increases by an extra $74.71) as opposed to universal, and when it forgoes health checks (the monthly marginal WTP increases by an extra 28US$).
| Item Type | Article |
|---|---|
| Copyright holders | © 2019 Elsevier B.V |
| Keywords | long term care insurance, constrained choices, self-insurance, behavioural constraints, insurance design |
| Departments | Health Policy |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jebo.2019.07.012 |
| Date Deposited | 23 Jul 2019 10:30 |
| Acceptance Date | 2019-07-22 |
| URI | https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/101215 |
-
picture_as_pdf -
subject - Accepted Version
-
- Available under Creative Commons: Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0