JEL classification

Journal of Economic Literature Classification (10696) C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods (1374) C9 - Design of Experiments (133) C90 - General (26)
Number of items at this level: 26.
A
  • Abbink, Klaus, Irlenbusch, Bernd, Pezanis-Christou, Paul, Rockenbach, Bettina, Sadrieh, Abdolkarim, Selten, Reinhard (2005). An experimental test of design alternatives for the British 3G/UMTS auction. European Economic Review, 49(2), 505-530. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(03)00044-8
  • Akay, Alpaslan, Bargain, Olivier, Jara, H. Xavier (2023). Experienced versus decision utility: large-scale comparison for income-leisure preferences. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 125(4), 823 - 859. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjoe.12538 picture_as_pdf
  • Sælen, Håkon, Dietz, Simon, Hepburn, Cameron, Helgeson, Jennifer, Atkinson, Giles (2009). Siblings, not triplets: social preferences for risk, inequality and time in discounting climate change. Economics, 20(3), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2009-26
    • B
  • Banerjee, Sanchayan, Galizzi, Matteo M., John, Peter, Mourato, Susana (2022). What works best in promoting climate citizenship? A randomised, systematic evaluation of nudge, think, boost and nudge+. (Geography and Environment Discussion Paper Series 32). Department of Geography and Environment, LSE. picture_as_pdf
  • Boeri, Tito Michele, Gamalerio, Matteo, Morelli, Massimo, Negri, Margherita (2023). Pay-as-they-get-in: attitudes towards migrants and pension systems. (CEP Discussion Papers CEPDP1907). London School of Economics and Political Science. Centre for Economic Performance. picture_as_pdf
  • Brañas-Garza, Pablo, Galizzi, Matteo M., Nieboer, Jeroen (2018). Experimental and self-reported measures of risk taking and digit ratio (2D:4D): evidence from a large, systematic study. International Economic Review, 59(3), 1131 - 1157. https://doi.org/10.1111/iere.12299
  • Bursztyn, Leonardo, Callen, Mike, Ferman, Bruno, Gulzar, Saad, Hasanain, Ali, Yuchtman, Noam (2020). Political identity: experimental evidence on anti-Americanism in Pakistan. Journal of the European Economic Association, 18(5), 2532 – 2560. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeea/jvz053 picture_as_pdf
  • Eble, Alex, Boone, Peter, Elbourne, Diana (2013). Risk and evidence of bias in randomized controlled trials in economics. (CEP Discussion Papers CEPDP1240). London School of Economics and Political Science. Centre for Economic Performance. picture_as_pdf
  • Nguyen, Lien, Jokimäki, Hanna, Linnosmaa, Ismo, Saloniki, Eirini Christina, Batchelder, Laurie, Malley, Juliette, Lu, Hui, Burge, Peter, Trukeschitz, Birgit, Forder, Julien (2021). Do you prefer safety to social participation? Finnish population-based preference weights for the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit (ASCOT) for service users. MDM: Policy and Practice, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/23814683211027902 picture_as_pdf
  • Nguyen, Lien, Jokimäki, Hanna, Linnosmaa, Ismo, Saloniki, Eirini Christina, Batchelder, Laurie, Malley, Juliette, Lu, Hui, Burge, Peter, Trukeschitz, Birgit, Forder, Julien (2022). Valuing informal carers’ quality of life using best-worst scaling—Finnish preference weights for the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit for carers (ASCOT-Carer). European Journal of Health Economics, 23(3), 357 - 374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-021-01356-3 picture_as_pdf
    • C
  • Chassang, Sylvain, Padró i Miquel, Gerard, Snowberg, Erik (2012). Selective trials: a principal-agent approach to randomized control experiments. American Economic Review, 102(4), 1279-1309. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.4.1279
  • Chassang, Sylvain, Padró i Miquel, Gerard, Snowberg, Erik (2010). Selective trials: a principal-agent approach to randomized controlled trials. (NBER working papers 16343). NBER.
  • Cárdenas, Juan Camilo, Chong, Alberto, Ñopo, Hugo (2009). To what extent do Latin Americans trust, reciprocate, and cooperate?: Evidence from experiments in six Latin American countries. Economía, 9(2), 45 - 88. https://doi.org/10.1353/eco.0.0027 picture_as_pdf
    • D
  • Dannenberg, Astrid, Dini, Giorgio, Tavoni, Alessandro, Weingaertner, Eva (2026). Food choice with increased visibility - a field experiment at an environmental economics conference. Ecological Economics, 240, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108816 picture_as_pdf
  • Galizzi, Matteo M., Wiesen, Daniel (2018). Behavioral experiments in health economics. In Hamilton, Jonathan H., Dixit, Avinash, Edwards, Sebastian, Judd, Kenneth (Eds.), Oxford research encyclopedia of economics and finance . Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190625979.013.244
    • F
  • Frijters, Paul, Kong, Tao Sherry, Liu, Elaine M. (2015). Who is coming to the artefactual field experiment? Participation bias among Chinese rural migrants. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 114, 62-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2015.03.006
  • Frijters, Paul, Islam, Asad, Pakrashi, Debayan (2019). Heterogeneity in peer effects in random dormitory assignment in a developing country. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 163, 117-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2019.04.025 picture_as_pdf
    • G
  • Galizzi, Matteo M. (2014). What is really behavioral in behavioral health policy? And does it work? Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 36(1), 25-60. https://doi.org/10.1093/aepp/ppt036
  • Lohmann, Paul M., Gsottbauer, Elisabeth, Gravert, Christina, Reisch, Lucia A. (2025). Nudging, fast and slow: experimental evidence from food choices under time pressure. Environmental and Resource Economics, 88(10), 2595 - 2627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-025-01012-x picture_as_pdf
  • Schouwer, Thimo De, Gsottbauer, Elisabeth, Kesternich, Iris, Schumacher, Heiner (2025). Work meaning and fair wages. Labour Economics, 97, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2025.102808 picture_as_pdf
    • I
  • Imas, Alex, Madarász, Kristóf (2024). Superiority-seeking and the preference for exclusion. Review of Economic Studies, 91(4), 2347 – 2386. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdad079 picture_as_pdf
  • Marino, Maria, Iacono, Roberto, Mollerstrom, Johanna (2023). (Mis-)perceptions, information, and political polarization. (III Working Paper 90). International Inequalities Institute, London School of Economics and Political Science. https://doi.org/10.21953/lse.vhrfafvh9uv2 picture_as_pdf
    • M
  • Moscati, Ivan (2024). Ellsberg 1961: text, context, influence. Decisions in Economics and Finance, 47(2), 627 - 653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10203-024-00437-1 picture_as_pdf
    • P
  • Palacios-Huerta, Ignacio (2025). The beautiful dataset. Journal of Economic Literature, 63(4), 1363 - 1423. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20241616
  • Pritchett, Lant (2024). Rely (only) on the rigorous evidence” is bad advice. Review of Development Economics, 28(4), 2034 - 2058. https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.13037 picture_as_pdf
    • Y
  • Young, Alwyn (2019). Channeling Fisher: randomization tests and the statistical insignificance of seemingly significant experimental results. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 134(2), 557 - 598. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjy029 picture_as_pdf