Items where Subject is "Z Bibliography. Library Science. Information Resources"

Library of Congress subjects (102278) Z Bibliography. Library Science. Information Resources (729) Z004 Books. Writing. Paleography (147) Z665 Library Science. Information Science (171) Z719 Libraries (General) (89) ZA Information resources (344)
Number of items at this level: 40.
Article
  • Faciolince, María, Green, Duncan (2021). One door opens another door shuts? Development and Change, 52(2), 373 - 382. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12633 picture_as_pdf
  • Lodge, Martin (2022). Editing Public Administration. Public Administration, 100(1), 12 - 16. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12824 picture_as_pdf
    • Conference or Workshop Item
  • Cornée, Nathalie (2020-03-02 - 2020-03-07) Towards a Better World: LSE's major contribution to the UN SDGs analysed by the library [Poster]. LSE Research Festival 2020, The London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom, GBR. picture_as_pdf
  • Dortmund, Annette, Williams, Helen K. R. (2021-01-12 - 2021-01-14) Transitioning to the next generation of metadata: key trends in context [Other]. 7 Congreso de bibliotecas universitarias y especializadas. desktop_windows
  • Williams, Helen K. R., Smith-Yoshimura, Karen (2020-11-19) Transitioning to the next generation of metadata: maximising the discoverability and use of digital resources [Other]. CILIP Conference 2020 - Reimagined. desktop_windows
    • Report
  • Duursma, Allard (2017). Data synthesis paper, July 2017. London School of Economics and Political Science. picture_as_pdf
    • Other
  • LSE Press (2022). LSE Press: publish with us. picture_as_pdf
  • Baldwin, Julie, Boroudjou, Hannah, Graves, Thomas, Galizzi, Matteo M., Higman, Rosie, Lambe, Lucy (2025). LSE ORWG guide: how to be an open researcher. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15183503 picture_as_pdf
  • Galizzi, Matteo M., Graves, Thomas, Kappes, Heather (2025). LSE ORWG guide: preregistration and pre-analysis plans for experimental research. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15182825 picture_as_pdf
  • Galizzi, Matteo M., Graves, Thomas, Kappes, Heather (2025). LSE ORWG guide: preregistration, pre-analysis plans, and registered reports. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15602169 picture_as_pdf
    • Blog post
  • Aguado López, Eduardo, Becerril García, Arianna (20 May 2020) The commercial model of academic publishing underscoring Plan S weakens the existing open access ecosystem in Latin America. Impact of Social Sciences Blog. picture_as_pdf
  • Barnes, Lucy (14 September 2021) Genuine open access to academic books requires collective solutions. Impact of Social Sciences Blog. picture_as_pdf
  • Campante, Filipe, Sturzenegger, Federico, Velasco, Andres (25 October 2021) Designing a useful textbook for an open access audience – Q and A with Filipe Campante, Federico Sturzenegger and Andrés Velasco, authors of Advanced macroeconomics: an easy guide. LSE Review of Books. picture_as_pdf
  • Campante, Filipe, Sturzenegger, Federico, Velasco, Andres (23 November 2021) Designing a useful textbook for an open access audience – a Q and A with the authors of Macroeconomics: an easy guide. LSE COVID-19 Blog. picture_as_pdf
  • Campante, Filipe, Sturzenegger, Federico, Velasco, Andres (31 October 2021) Q and A with Filipe Campante, Federico Sturzenegger and Andrés Velasco, authors of Advanced Macroeconomics: An Easy Guide. LSE European Politics and Policy (EUROPP) blog. picture_as_pdf
  • Canto, Patricia, Franco, Susana, Larrea, Miren (2 December 2019) Embracing multilingualism to enhance complexity sensitive research. Impact of Social Sciences Blog. picture_as_pdf
  • Carter, Laura (1 December 2019) Book review: the costs of connection: how data is colonizing human life and appropriating it for capitalism by Nick Couldry and Ulises A. Mejias. Impact of Social Sciences Blog. picture_as_pdf
  • Dunleavy, Patrick, Worthington, Sarah (1 November 2023) Five years of LSE Press: Q and A with Patrick Dunleavy and Sarah Worthington. LSE Review of Books. picture_as_pdf
  • Gadd, Elizabeth (20 January 2020) CRediT check - should we welcome tools to differentiate the contributions made to academic papers? Impact of Social Sciences Blog. picture_as_pdf
  • Genakos, Christos, Valletti, Tommaso, Sabatino, Lorien (26 May 2025) Cultural exception? Why regulating the book market contradicts conventional wisdom about competition. LSE European Politics and Policy (EUROPP) blog. picture_as_pdf
  • Giménez Toledo, Elea, Kulczycki, Emanuel, Pölönen, Janne, Sivertsen, Gunnar (5 December 2019) Bibliodiversity - what it is and why it is essential to creating situated knowledge. Impact of Social Sciences Blog. picture_as_pdf
  • Graves, Tom (24 October 2025) Who should control open access, the markets or the commons? Impact of Social Sciences Blog. picture_as_pdf
  • Hahnel, Mark (13 December 2019) The state of open data 2019 - what are the key issues in open data for researchers? Impact of Social Sciences Blog. picture_as_pdf
  • Hardcastle, James (10 December 2019) Old-fashioned peer review is still seen as the best way to allocate grants, but reviewers deserve greater recognition. Impact of Social Sciences Blog. picture_as_pdf
  • Heimstädt, Maximilian, Dobusch, Leonhard (10 January 2020) To address the rise of predatory publishing in the social sciences, journals need to experiment with open peer review. Impact of Social Sciences Blog. picture_as_pdf
  • Kalpokas, Ignas (25 March 2021) Book review: Delivering impact with digital resources: planning strategy in the attention economy by Simon Tanner. LSE Review of Books. picture_as_pdf
  • Krishnakumar, Jo, Graves, Tom (23 June 2025) What does “open research” mean for qualitative research? Impact of Social Sciences Blog.
  • Martín-Martín, Alberto, Orduna-Malea, Enrique, Thelwall, Mike, Delgado-López-Cózar, Emilio (3 December 2019) Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus which is best for me? Impact of Social Sciences Blog. picture_as_pdf
  • Nishikawa-Pacher, Andreas (18 October 2022) The dream of ‘editormetrics' - why a FAIR dataset of journal editors would benefit all researchers. Impact of Social Sciences Blog. picture_as_pdf
  • Pia, Andrea E., Zerilli, Filippo (24 October 2022) Food Sovereignty as a model for scholar-led open access publishing. Impact of Social Sciences Blog. picture_as_pdf
  • Roberts, Bryan W., Teira, David (29 January 2021) Publishing philosophy Open Access without a Particle Collider. Impact of Social Sciences Blog. picture_as_pdf
  • Rooryck, Johan (4 December 2019) Opportunity or threat? What Plan S can contribute to Open Access in Latin America. Impact of Social Sciences Blog. picture_as_pdf
  • Rooryck, Johan (3 December 2019) The Plan S open access initiative creates more opportunities than threats for Latin America. LSE Latin America and Caribbean Blog. picture_as_pdf
  • Roumbanis, Lambros (11 December 2019) Blind luck - could lotteries be a more efficient mechanism for allocating research funds than peer review? Impact of Social Sciences Blog. picture_as_pdf
  • Rumsey, Sally (26 October 2022) Reviewing the Rights Retention Strategy - a pathway to wider Open Access? Impact of Social Sciences Blog. picture_as_pdf
  • Røstvik, Camilla (25 October 2022) Five lessons from four centuries of journal publishing - what the history of the Philosophical Transactions tells us about academic publishing. Impact of Social Sciences Blog. picture_as_pdf
  • Siler, Kyle (13 May 2020) There is no black and white definition of predatory publishing. Impact of Social Sciences Blog. picture_as_pdf
  • Spichtinger, Daniel (17 January 2020) Not yet the default setting - in 2020 open research remains a work in progress. Impact of Social Sciences Blog. picture_as_pdf
  • Taster, Michael (22 December 2021) 2021 in review: the culture of academic publishing. Impact of Social Sciences Blog. picture_as_pdf
  • le Roux, Elizabeth (30 December 2020) The myth of the ‘book famine’ in African publishing. Africa at LSE. picture_as_pdf