Items where Subject is "KD England and Wales"

Library of Congress subjects (102130) K Law (6100) KD England and Wales (713) KDC Scotland (98)
Number of items at this level: 687.
Accounting
  • Kurunmaki, Liisa, Miller, Peter (2011). Regulatory hybrids: partnerships, budgeting and modernising government. Management Accounting Research, 22(4), 220-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2010.08.004
    • Anthropology
  • Forbess, Alice, James, Deborah (2014). Acts of assistance: navigating the interstices of the British state with the help of non-profit legal advisers. Social Analysis, 58(3), 73-89. https://doi.org/10.3167/sa.2014.580306
  • Lee Koch, Insa (2024). From criminals to slaves: “modern slavery,” drug trafficking, and the cultural politics of victimhood in postcolonial Britain. Current Anthropology, 65(2), 267 - 291. https://doi.org/10.1086/729537
    • Care Policy and Evaluation Centre
  • Davies, Bleddyn, Fernández, José-Luis (2000). Empowerment in post-reform community care in England and Wales. In Heumann, Leonard F., McCall, Mary E., Boldy, Duncan P. (Eds.), Empowering Frail Elderly People: Opportunities and Impediments in Housing, Health and Support Service Delivery (pp. 81-100). Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc..
    • Centre for Analysis of Risk & Regulation
  • Baldwin, Robert, Black, Julia, Cave, Martin (2005). A legal services board: roles and operationalising issues. Department for Constitutional Affairs, UK Government.
  • Black, Julia (2010). Appendix A: a review of enforcement techniques. In Criminal Liability in Regulatory Contexts (pp. 150-186). Stationery Office.
  • Black, Julia (2011). Calibrating regulation. Legal Services Board.
  • Black, Julia (2003). Enrolling actors in regulatory systems: examples from UK financial services regulation. Public Law, 2003(Spring), 63-91.
  • Black, Julia (2010). Risk based regulation. In The Future of the Legal Services: Emerging Thinking (pp. 5-10). Legal Services Board.
  • Black, Julia (2007). Tensions in the regulatory state. Public Law, 2007(Spring), 58-73.
  • Jennings, Will, Lodge, Martin, Ryan, Matt (2018). Comparing blunders in government. European Journal of Political Research, 57(1), 238 - 258. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12230
    • Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion
  • Stein, Jonathan M. (2001). The future of social justice in Britain: a new mission for the community legal service. (CASEpaper 48). Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion.
    • Centre for Economic Performance
  • Bell, Brian, Costa, Rui, Machin, Stephen (2016). Crime, compulsory schooling laws and education. Economics of Education Review, 54, 214-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2015.09.007
  • Draca, Mirko, Machin, Steve, Witt, Robert (2008). Panic on the streets of London: police, crime and the July 2005 terror attacks. (CEPDP 852). London School of Economics and Political Science. Centre for Economic Performance.
  • Overman, Henry G. (2012). (More) planning rule reform.
  • Overman, Henry G. (2012). Relaxing planning laws.
  • Simpson, R. (1993). The right to strike and the law in Britain. (CEP discussion paper 128). London School of Economics and Political Science. Centre for Economic Performance.
    • Economic History
  • Claridge, Jordan, Gibbs, Spike (2020). Waifs and strays: property rights in late medieval England. (Economic History Working Papers 313). London School of Economics and Political Science. picture_as_pdf
  • Johnson, Paul (1996). Creditors, debtors and the law in Victorian and Edwardian England. (Economic History working papers 31/96). Department of Economic History, London School of Economics and Political Science.
  • Leunig, Tim (2011). Conditional discharges for looters that come forward would be a first step towards community reconciliation in the wake of the recent riots.
    • Economics
  • Anderlini, Luca, Felli, Leonardo, Postlewaite, Andrew (2011). Should courts always enforce what contracting parties write? Review of Law and Economics, 7(1), 15 - 29. https://doi.org/10.2202/1555-5879.1492
  • Barr, Nicholas (2016). Letter to friends: this is why I will vote Remain in the referendum.
  • Manning, Alan (3 December 2025) Is there merit in Labour's asylum policies? British Politics and Policy at LSE. picture_as_pdf
    • European Institute
  • Barr, Nicholas (2016). Letter to friends: this is why I will vote Remain in the referendum.
  • Cheshire, Paul (2016). Greenbelt madness: or how to get it back to front.
  • Coulter, Steve (2015). Reforming UK labour regulation – in or out of the EU – would be hard work.
  • Grogan, Joelle (2018). EU law is not a thing we simply leave behind on Brexit day. picture_as_pdf
  • Hobolt, Sara, Hagemann, Sara (2016). A vote to leave the EU may have a detrimental impact on Parliament.
  • Karemba, Byron (2018). Brexit, the separation of powers and the role of the supreme court. picture_as_pdf
  • Townsend, Mike (2018). Will the Brexit cloud have a silver lining for conservationists? picture_as_pdf
  • de Grauwe, Paul (2016). After Brexit, the EU must break with neo-liberalism and address the discontents of globalisation.
    • Finance
  • Thimann, Christian (2016). Insurance and systemic risk: no easy conclusions. VoxEU,
    • Financial Markets Group
  • Bhattacharya, Sudipto, Guriev, Sergei (2008). Control rights over intellectual property: corporate venturing and bankruptcy regimes. (Financial Markets Group Discussion Papers 618). Financial Markets Group, The London School of Economics and Political Science.
  • Goodhart, Charles, Ostergaard, Charlotte (1999). Guest editorial. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 6(4), 302-303.
    • Gender Studies
  • Lacey, Nicola (2014). Gouvernement-manageur et citoyens-consommateurs. Le cas du Criminal Justice Act 1991. Tracés, 2(27), 183-210.
    • Geography and Environment
  • Ahlfeldt, Gabriel M., Holman, Nancy (2018). Distinctively different: a new approach to valuing architectural amenities. The Economic Journal, 128(608), 1 - 33. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12429
  • Ahlfeldt, Gabriel M., Möller, Kristoffer, Waights, Sevrin, Wendland, Nicolai (2017). Game of zones: the political economy of conservation areas. The Economic Journal, 127(605), F421 - F445. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12454
  • Cheshire, Paul (2016). Greenbelt madness: or how to get it back to front.
  • Hilber, Christian A. L. (2016). The UK planning system: fit for purpose? Planning and Building Control Today, July, 8-11.
  • Hilber, Christian A. L. (2016). The UK planning system: proposals for reform. Planning and Building Control Today, Oct., 8-10.
  • Hilber, Christian A. L. (2016-09-19) The economic impact of the British planning and fiscal system: business rates devolution and other policy options [Other]. Department for Communities and Local Government Research Seminar, London, United Kingdom, GBR.
  • Hilber, Christian A. L., Schöni, Olivier (2016). Housing policies in Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. In Yoshino, Naoyuki, Helble, Matthias (Eds.), The Housing Challenge in Emerging Asia : Options and Solutions (pp. 210-259). Asian Development Bank Institute.
  • Overman, Henry G. (2012). (More) planning rule reform.
  • Overman, Henry G. (2012). Relaxing planning laws.
    • Government
  • Dunleavy, Patrick (29 April 2015) Why the 2015 UK election spells the bitter end for the biggest ‘law’ in political science. USApp-American Politics and Policy Blog. picture_as_pdf
  • Dunleavy, Patrick, Bastow, Simon, Tinkler, Jane, Goldchluck, Sofia, Towers, Ed (2010). Joining up citizen redress in UK central government. In Adler, Michael (Ed.), Administrative Justice in Context (pp. 421-456). Hart Publishing.
  • Grogan, Joelle (2018). EU law is not a thing we simply leave behind on Brexit day. picture_as_pdf
  • Hale, Thomas, Koenig-Archibugi, Mathias (2016). Do Britons and other Europeans disagree on policy issues? The answer might surprise you.
  • Jennings, Will, Lodge, Martin, Ryan, Matt (2018). Comparing blunders in government. European Journal of Political Research, 57(1), 238 - 258. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12230
  • Karemba, Byron (2018). Brexit, the separation of powers and the role of the supreme court. picture_as_pdf
  • Larcinese, Valentino, Sircar, Indraneel (2017). Crime and punishment the British way: accountability channels following the MPs’ expenses scandal. European Journal of Political Economy, 47, 75-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2016.12.006
  • Page, Edward C. (2001). Governing by numbers: delegated legislation and everyday policy making. Hart Publishing.
  • Townsend, Mike (2018). Will the Brexit cloud have a silver lining for conservationists? picture_as_pdf
    • Grantham Research Institute
  • Brown, Jennifer, Mackie, Jeannie, Shell, Yvonne (2016). Defending Helen Archer – marital rape and the role of expert testimony in cases involving domestic abuse.
  • Higham, Catherine, Parekh, Ruchi (29 November 2024) The UK's role in phasing out fossil fuels from COP to the courts. British Politics and Policy at LSE. picture_as_pdf
  • Sherry, Maeve (21 November 2024) Harnessing England's Biodiversity Net Gain legislation to amplify urban flood risk management. British Politics and Policy at LSE. picture_as_pdf
    • International History
  • Meehan, Elizabeth (2016). Is freedom of information a viable research tool? Step three: responses and conclusions.
    • International Relations
  • Hale, Thomas, Koenig-Archibugi, Mathias (2016). Do Britons and other Europeans disagree on policy issues? The answer might surprise you.
  • Xenakis, Sappho (2008). Domestic elite perceptions of British corruption. (Crime and culture discussion paper series 19). University of Konstanz.
  • Xenakis, Sappho (2007). The dog(s) that didn’t bark: exploring perceptions of corruption in the UK. (Discussion Paper Series). University of Konstanz.
  • Xenakis, Sappho (2008). The view from above: interviews with corruption experts in the UK. (Crime and culture discussion paper series 18). University of Konstanz.
    • LSE
  • London School of Economics and Social Sciences (2010). Copyright? Why would I need to worry about that? The challenge of providing copyright support for staff. Legal Information Management, 10(3), 166-170. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1472669610000654
  • Allen, Graham (2014). Five minutes with Graham Allen: “unlike most democracies, the UK lacks a document that sets out the rules of the political game”.
  • Allen, Graham, Smith, Martin, Richards, Dave (25 May 2015) The demise of the Parliament’s Political and Constitutional Reform Committee: executive power is again predominant. Democratic Audit Blog. picture_as_pdf
  • Allen, Rob (2014). Wholesale changes to the probation system should be slowed down and piloted.
  • Amery, Fran (2018). A sea-change in abortion politics: Stella Creasy's proposal and its significance for the entire UK. picture_as_pdf
  • Balch, Alex (2010). The asylum amnesty ‘scandal’: mind the gap.
  • Barber, Stephen (2014). UKIP’s rise could spark unplanned but welcome constitutionalreform.
  • Baston, Lewis (2012). How should ‘political England’ be recognised?
  • Baxter, Jacqueline, Farrell, Catherine (2015). Governing public services in England and Wales: a move from the stakeholder model could further the democratic deficit.
  • Beckett, Charlie (2010). Blair at Chilcot: 'the Superbowl of self-justification'.
  • Beetham, David (2011). News International and corporate power in Britain’s democracy: just the tip of the ‘unelected oligarchies’ iceberg.
  • Berry, Craig (2014). Unless greater heed is paid to political economy, devolutioncould become a red herring of democratisation.
  • Berry, Richard (2015). Book Review: Making British law: committees in action by Louise Thompson.
  • Bew, Paul (2014). The Committee on Standards in Public Life is responding to the need for scrutiny of ethical standards in local government.
  • Blick, Andrew (2011). Police reform: why democracy is not just about elections.
  • Blick, Andrew (2011). Reforming the constitution: process matters.
  • Blick, Andrew (2010). Reports of Parliament’s decline much exaggerated.
  • Blick, Andrew (2011). Special advisers and the ‘phone-hacking’ scandal.
  • Blick, Andrew (2016). To appreciate the importance of the Brexit referendum, we must consider the series of constitutional issues that it raises.
  • Blick, Andrew (2011). What is the UK constitution made of? Exposing the ‘hidden wiring’.
  • Blick, Andrew (2010). What would be the constitutional consequences of Lords reform?
  • Blick, Andrew, Thompson, Louise, Trench, Alan, Paun, Akash (2015). EVEL intentions, or a necessary solution? Experts respond to the Government’s English Votes for English Laws proposals.
  • Blumenau, Jack, Hanretty, Chris, Lauderdale, Benjamin, Vivyan, Nick (2015). Focus on… the South West.
  • Boyle, Katie (2015). The Government’s new EVEL timeline still isn’t sufficient to facilitate the necessary debate and deliberation.
  • Broughton Micova, Sally (2012). 2012 may bring a reversal by the government on the deregulation of the UK’s media.
  • Brown, Richard (2015). More radical thinking than we are currently seeing will be needed to secure the devolved powers that London needs.
  • Chien, Ching-Lien (1936). The place of judiciary in the modern state, with special reference to the English judiciary [Doctoral thesis]. London School of Economics and Political Science.
  • Choudhury, Barnie (2011). Oliver Letwin’s dumping of personal documents reminds us that the Data Protection Act is there to protect all of us.
  • Choudhury, Barnie (2011). Super-injunctions about the sex lives of celebrities are not in the public interest: the law should not be used to argue privacy in these cases.
  • Copus, Colin (14 May 2015) The next step for local government should be the right to pass primary legislation. Democratic Audit Blog. picture_as_pdf
  • Crone, Stephen (2011). Party funding reform: Canadian experience suggests a negotiated settlement is essential.
  • Crone, Stephen (2011). Who monitors external appointments to government departmental boards?
  • David-Barrett, Liz (2011). Fixing the revolving door.
  • Denny, Emily (2016). What does it mean for public policy to be ‘Made in Wales’?
  • Dias, Dexter (2014). Why barristers walked out of court.
  • Downes, David, Newburn, Tim (2022). The official history of criminal justice in England and Wales Volume IV: the politics of law and order. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003330981
  • Dunleavy, Patrick (2016). In Scotland, Wales and the London Assembly elections every voter has TWO choices this Thursday. Here’s how to use both votes well.
  • Evans, Adam (2014). The Audacity of Nope: Meaningful fiscal accountability remains a pipe dream for Wales.
  • Evans, Adam (2013). Much ado about nothing: Fiscal accountability in Wales and the Silk Commission.
  • Evans, Adam (2014). While the Scottish people may be on the brink of the unknown, the Welsh continue to prefer familiarity.
  • Evans, Steffan (2015). How extending the right to buy in England could change the relationship between the government and housing associations.
  • Evans, Steffan (2016). The Welsh Assembly after the elections: housing policy could be an area upon which to build a coalition.
  • Fleming, Andrew (2015). Ofcom should count the Greens as a major party.
  • Foster, Helen (2016). The homelessness reduction bill is a piece of token legislation.
  • Gale, Stephanie (2012). The only way is ethics: newspapers after Leveson (Polis conference guest blog) #Polis12.
  • Game, Chris (2014). The prospects for local government independence are bleakdue to the centre’s unwillingness to give up power.
  • Gearty, Conor (2005). Human rights in an age of counter-terrorism: injurious, irrelevant or indispensable? Current Legal Problems, 58(1), 25-46. https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/58.1.25
  • Gearty, Conor (2006). Uncommon decency. New Humanist, 121(1), 24-26.
  • Gearty, Conor (1994). The cost of human rights: English judges and the Northern Irish troubles. Current Legal Problems, 47(2), 19-40. https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/47.Part_2.19
  • Giannoulopoulos, Dimitrios, Nice, Geoffrey, Chigara, Ben, Petley, Julian, de la Rasilla, Ignacio, Sarmiento-Mirwaldt, Katja (2016). The Article 50 ruling means Parliament must not merely rubber-stamp Brexit with a three-line bill.
  • Gillespie, Paul (2016). A contested Brexit would be disruptive for Ireland, both North and South.
  • Goplerud, Max (2014). Money or signatures: which is a larger barrier to new parties trying to contest parliamentary elections?
  • Gordon, Michael (19 October 2018) How democratic is the UK’s basic constitutional law? Democratic Audit Blog. picture_as_pdf
  • Gordon, Mike (2011). The EU Bill is flawed, but it could open up other options for democratic reform.
  • Gostyńska-Jakubowska, Agata, Lazowski, Adam (2016). The Brexiteers’ exit plan: legally dubious, unfeasible and likely to antagonise our neighbours.
  • Grogan, Joelle (2017). The Article 50 case explained in sticky notes.
  • Grogan, Joelle (2017). The Great Repeal Bill explained in sticky notes.
  • Grogan, Joelle (2017). The Supreme Court’s ruling on Article 50 – in sticky notes.
  • Grogan, Joelle (2017). The (not so) great repeal bill, part 1: only uncertainty is certain.
  • Hakim, Catherine (1989). Free access to public data. The House Magazine,
  • Hale-Ross, Simon (2014). The UK should urgently legitimise the revocation of UKcitizenship to the Islamic State’s British members.
  • Hanstock, Richard (2014). Book review: How can you represent those people? by Abbe Smith and Monroe H. Freedman.
  • Hill, Eleanor (2015). Political parties need to take greater responsibility for Pakistani and Bangladeshi clan politicking in order to protect our democracy.
  • Hintz, Arne, Dencik, Lina (2015). The Post-Snowden Surveillance Policy Turmoil.
  • Honeyball, Mary (2016). Taking the law into our own hands: the perils of a British Bill of Rights.
  • Hosein, Ian, Whitley, Edgar A., Angell, Ian, Davies, Simon (2007). Reflections on the academic policy analysis process and the UK identity cards scheme. Information Society, 23(1), 51-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240601059060
  • Jancic, Davor (2017). Why the European Court of Justice isn’t going away.
  • Johnson, Craig (2017). How Wales is understood in the UK is a problem – strengthening Welsh media is part of the solution.
  • Jones, Huw David (2012). Comms Review Series: Wales Wants PSB & Local Content, but not Regulatory Devolution.
  • Jones, Ian (2012). Social Digital Series: Digital inclusion and evidence-based policy: Insights from Wales.
  • Kaeding, Michael, Stack, Kevin M. (2016). A dearth of legislative vetoes: why the Council and Parliament have been reluctant to veto Commission legislation.
  • Keenan, Bernard (2014). On fantasy island: the seven myths undermining human rights in the UK today.
  • Khaitan, Tarunabh (29 July 2015) The past 40 years have seen significant divergence between the US and UK around the law on indirect discrimination. USApp-American Politics and Policy Blog. picture_as_pdf
  • Khan, Sarah (2016). The anti-Prevent lobby are dominating the discourse, not all Muslims oppose Prevent.
  • Killock, Jim (2017). The Law Commission’s dangerous proposals would turn whistleblowers and journalists into ‘spies’.
  • Klug, Francesca (12 February 2009) Solidity or wind?” What’s on the menu in the bill of rights debate? openDemocracy.
  • Klug, Francesca (2009). Solidity or wind?" What's on the menu in the bill of rights debate? Political Quarterly, 80(3), 420 - 426. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923X.2009.01997.x
  • Kulikova, Alexandra (28 November 2012) What do we want of Leveson report? Polis Blog. picture_as_pdf
  • Loveday, Barry (2013). Despite the manner of their election, Police and Crime Commissioners are bringing about a significant change in the governance of the police.
  • McAngus, Craig (2013). The challenge for Plaid Cymru’s leadership will be to harness the energy of their membership.
  • McElroy, Ruth (2017). The future of media in Wales: policy challenges.
  • McHargh, Aileen (2014). Devo-max could complicate David Cameron’s plans to repeal the Human Rights Act.
  • McNeilly, Kathryn, Bloomer, Fiona, Pierson, Claire (9 June 2018) The Supreme Court's decision on Northern Ireland's abortion law - what now? British Politics and Policy at LSE. picture_as_pdf
  • Mead, David (2011). Dropping the case against the Fortnum protesters is not as interesting as their charges of aggravated trespass. This is yet another threat to the freedom to protest.
  • Meehan, Elizabeth (2016). Is freedom of information a viable research tool? Step two: receiving a response to a request.
  • Meehan, Elizabeth (2015). Is “freedom of information” a viable research tool? Step one: composing a request.
  • Mian, Emran (2014). If Westminster politicians think that a No vote in the referendum represents a final victory, they are in for a rude surprise.
  • Moran, Danielle (2010). Music, creativity and copyright: Sharkey gig at LSE.
  • Murkens, Jo (2017). Miller in the Supreme Court: a welcome reminder of the function of a constitution and the rule of law.
  • Murkens, Jo Eric Khushal (2017). The Supreme Court ruling explained: The government requires primary legislation before it can change the constitution.
  • Mycock, Andy, Giovannini, Arianna (2015). The prospect of greater regional and city devolution raises the spectre of the “Manchester Withington question”.
  • Newburn, Tim (2013). Book review: Undercover: the true story of Britain’s secret police.
  • Ortino, Federico, Hestermeyer, Holger (14 November 2017) Article 50 does allow Britain to negotiate a transitional period. LSE Brexit. picture_as_pdf
  • Overman, Claire (2014). The Home Office’s exclusion of Dieudonné raises important issues regarding the protection of freedom of expression.
  • Overman, Claire (2014). The growing body of ‘right to die’ case law illustrates the issue’s growing prominence.
  • Pedley, Keiran (2015). Polling Matters: Why Plaid Cymru are not the SNP.
  • Peers, Steve (2016). Reading the small print: will Cameron’s EU migration reforms pass legal muster?
  • Pitt, Edward (2016). Too much EU interference? A look at the areas where critics say the single market overreaches itself.
  • Pitt, Edward (2016). What the EU did for English law – and British lawyers.
  • Reid, Gideon (28 November 2012) A look back to 19th Century thoughts on British free press & the law. Polis Blog. picture_as_pdf
  • Richards, Anthony (2016). Prevent: the shifting parameters of UK counter-terrorism.
  • Rifkind, Malcolm, Sedley, Stephen, Brown, Ian, Bochel, Hugh, Wilson Palow, Caroline, Pickles, Nick, Vermeulen, Mathias, Leigh, Ian, Raab, Charles (2014). Ends and means: experts debate the democratic oversight of the UK’s intelligence services.
  • Rutherford, Nat (2016). Justifications for the Investigatory Powers Bill are based on a very specific interpretation of freedom.
  • Sandberg, Russell (2016). How do you solve a problem like Sharia? The real issues raised by the Sharia law debate.
  • Sandberg, Russell (2016). Scientology and the need for a clear definition of religion under English law.
  • Schleiter, Petra, Fleming, Thomas (20 July 2020) Should the government be able to suspend parliament? British Politics and Policy at LSE. picture_as_pdf
  • Scott, Andrew (2009). Flash flood or slow burn?: celebrities, photographers and the Protection from Harassment Act. Media and Arts Law Review, 14(4), 397-424.
  • Scott, Andrew (2010). Interference with witnesses. In Cram, Ian (Ed.), Borrie and Lowe: the Law of Contempt . LexisNexis Butterworths.
  • Scully, Roger (2015). Labour in Wales: perhaps the biggest polling movement in recent UK history that almost no-one has heard of.
  • Shah, Prakash (2016). What lies behind the inclusion of caste in the UK Equality Act?
  • Silk, Paul (2013). The Commission on Devolution in Wales: Considering what, if any, the next steps in Wales’ journey of devolution should be.
  • Skoutaris, Nikos (2016). Never letting go: why Scotland is at constitutional stalemate over Brexit.
  • Spiller, Keith (2015). Gaining access to CCTV images is far more difficult than the legislation suggests it ought to be.
  • Stirbu, Diana Silvia, McAllister, Laura (2016). If it’s broken, fix it! Time to rethink the AMS electoral system in Wales.
  • Swan, Sean (2015). Once again the Constitution seems vulnerable to piecemeal reform arising out of sectional party interest.
  • Swan, Sean (2015). Overcoming the UK’s constitutional crisis may require the development of more flexible relationships between the constituent nations.
  • Swan, Sean (2016). The constitutional settlement of the UK has been thrown into flux – an overarching polity is urgently needed.
  • Tarrant, Alison, Hayes, Lydia (20 May 2020) The suspension of routine inspections renders care homes invisible to scrutiny and costs lives. British Politics and Policy at LSE. picture_as_pdf
  • Taylor, Helen, Kaehne, Axel (2016). Public consultations do not currently enable all stakeholders to effectively contribute to the legislative process.
  • Thompson, Ian (2015). The potential for public dialogue and deliberation in the development of national infrastructure policy.
  • Thompson, Louise (2015). EVEL, Brexit, and the SNP: what does the 2015 election mean for the House of Commons?
  • Trench, Alan (2016). Not meeting the challenge: the failings of the draft Wales bill.
  • Trench, Alan (2015). The UK is at a constitutional crossroads and major change is needed if it is to work effectively.
  • Tsouvalis, Judith (2015). How social and citizen science help challenge the limits of the biosecurity approach: the case of ash dieback.
  • Walulik, Jan (14 April 2020) Assessing the UK’s plans for an independent aviation safety regulator. LSE European Politics and Policy (EUROPP) blog. picture_as_pdf
  • Wellings, Ben, Vines, Emma (2015). Are EU referendums undermining parliamentary sovereignty?
  • West, Francis (2016). Francis West – leadership and being first aren’t the same things: an assessment of the UK national action plan on business and human rights.
  • Wilks-Heeg, Stuart (2010). Do referendums ever resolve constitutional debates?
  • Wilks-Heeg, Stuart (2010). Postal voting and electoral fraud.
  • Wilks-Heeg, Stuart (2011). Talking sense on Lords reform: why the PSA’s new briefing fills a crucial gap.
  • Wilks-Heeg, Stuart (2011). What’s happening to our democracy?
  • Wilks-Heeg, Stuart, Blick, Andrew, Crone, Stephen (2013). Unfinished devolution has created constitutional imbalances in the UK.
  • Wilks-Heeg, Stuart, Blick, Andrew, Crone, Stephen (2013). What is the extent of electoral fraud at English elections?
  • Wilks-Heeg, Stuart, Crone, Stephen, Blick, Andrew (2014). Legal aid cuts may mean excluded members of society are denied access to a vital part of our democratic system.
  • Williams, Amy (2014). The human rights act: Labour renews its vows to the UK’s Bill of Rights.
  • Winzen, Thomas (2016). The EU doesn’t weaken UK parliamentary democracy as much as Leavers have you believe.
  • Witney, Simon (2017). Brexit in the Supreme Court – a landmark ruling, or monumental waste of time and money?
  • Woodhead, Linda (2016). The government’s changes to faith schools side with hardline religion.
  • Worthy, Ben (2011). Despite the uphill battle in extending Freedom of Information to companies doing public work, the open data movement is already beginning to hold many of them to account.
  • Worthy, Ben (2015). The Government’s Freedom of Information commission tilts the political discussion towards damage and cost.
  • Worthy, Ben, John, Peter, Vannoni, Matia (2016). Better than asking: an experiment on the effectiveness of FOI requests.
  • Zander, Michael, Henderson, Paul (1993). Crown Court study. (Research Study 19). Stationery Office. picture_as_pdf
  • de Felice, Damiano (2016). Margaret Jungk resigns from UN Working Group and emphasises need for stronger measurement in business and human rights.
  • de Londras, Fiona (2017). The new sovereigntism: what it means for human rights law in the UK.
    • LSE Health
  • Grundy, Emily, Murphy, Michael J. (2006). Kin availability, contact and support exchanges between adult children and their parents in Great Britain. In Ebtehaj, Fatemeh, Lindley, Bridget, Richards, Martin (Eds.), Kinship Matters (pp. 195-215). Hart Publishing.
  • Kurunmaki, Liisa, Miller, Peter (2011). Regulatory hybrids: partnerships, budgeting and modernising government. Management Accounting Research, 22(4), 220-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2010.08.004
    • LSE Human Rights
  • Chinkin, Christine (2010). International humanitarian law, human rights and the UK courts. In Boisson de Chazournes, Laurence, Kohen, Marcelo G. (Eds.), International Law and the Quest for Its Implementation: Liber Amicorum Vera Gowlland-Debbas . Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
  • Ewing, K D, Gearty, Conor (1997). A law too far: Part III of the Police Bill 1997. Civil Liberties Research Unit.
  • Ewing, Keith, Gearty, Conor (2000). The struggle for civil liberties: political freedom and the rule of law in Britain, 1914-1945. Oxford University Press.
  • Gearty, Conor (2005). 11 September 2001, counter-terrorism and the Human Rights Act. Journal of Law and Society, 32(1), 18-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6478.2005.312_1.x
  • Gearty, Conor (2005). Book review: beyond comparison: sex and discrimination, by Timothy Macklem. Modern Law Review, 68(1), 158-161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2005.533_2.x
  • Gearty, Conor (2001). The Casement treason trial in its legal context. Irish Jurist, 36, 31-42.
  • Gearty, Conor (2004). The Casement treason trial in its legal context. In Daly, Mary E. (Ed.), Roger Casement in Irish and World History (pp. 151-161). Royal Irish Academy.
  • Gearty, Conor (1993). Citizenship and freedom of expression. In Blackburn, Robert (Ed.), Rights of Citizenship (pp. 271-294). Mansell (Firm).
  • Gearty, Conor (2003). Civil liberties and human rights. In Bamforth, Nicholas, Leyland, Peter (Eds.), Public Law in a Multi-Layered Constitution (pp. 371-390). Hart Publishing.
  • Gearty, Conor (2000). Constitutional and human rights law. In Hayton, David J. (Ed.), Law's Future(S): British Legal Developments in the 21st Century (pp. 53-70). Hart Publishing.
  • Gearty, Conor (1994). Freedom of assembly and public order. In McCrudden, Christopher, Chambers, Gerald (Eds.), Individual Rights and the Law in Britain (pp. 39-68). Oxford University Press.
  • Gearty, Conor (1999). The Human Rights Act 1998 and the role of the Strasbourg organs: some preliminary reflections. In Anderson, Gavin W. (Ed.), Rights and Democracy: Essays in Uk-Canadian Constitutionalism (pp. 169-192). Blackstone Press (London, England).
  • Gearty, Conor (2002). The Human Rights Act and the criminal law: an overview of the early case-law. In Boyle, Alan, Himsworth, Chris, Loux, Andrea, MacQueen, Hector (Eds.), Human Rights and Scots Law: Comparative Perspectives on the Incorporation of the Echr (pp. 293-306). Hart Publishing.
  • Gearty, Conor (2000). The Human Rights Act: an overview. In Ewing, Keith (Ed.), Human Rights at Work (pp. 1-23). Institute of Employment Rights.
  • Gearty, Conor (1994). Political violence and civil liberties. In McCrudden, Christopher, Chambers, Gerald (Eds.), Individual Rights and the Law in Britain (pp. 145-178). Oxford University Press.
  • Gearty, Conor (2004). Principles of human rights adjudication. Oxford University Press.
  • Gearty, Conor (2002). Reconciling Parliamentary democracy and human rights. Law Quarterly Review, 118(Apr), 248-269.
  • Gearty, Conor (2001). Reflections on human rights and civil liberties in light of the United Kingdom's Human Rights Act 1998. University of Richmond Law Review, 35(1), 1-25.
  • Gearty, Conor (2003). Revisiting section 3(1) of the Human Rights Act. Law Quarterly Review, 119(Oct), 551-553.
  • Gearty, Conor (2001). Tort law and the Human Rights Act. In Campbell, Tom, Ewing, Keith, Tomkins, Adam (Eds.), Sceptical Essays on Human Rights (pp. 243-260). Oxford University Press.
  • Gearty, Conor (2005). With a little help from our friends. Index on Censorship, 34(1), 46-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/03064220512331339463
  • Gearty, Conor (1989). The place of private nuisance in a modern law of torts. Cambridge Law Journal, 48(2), 214-242. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000819730010529X
  • Gearty, Conor, Davies, Stephen (2000). Insolvency practice and the Human Rights Act 1998. Jordans (Firm).
  • Gearty, Conor, Ewing, Keith (1994). Democracy or a bill of rights. The Society.
  • Gearty, Conor, Kimbell, J. A. (1995). Terrorism and the rule of law. Civil Liberties Research Unit, King's College.
  • Johnson, Mark, Gearty, Conor (2007). Civil liberties and the challenge of terrorism. In Park, Alison, Curtice, John, Thomson, Katarina, Phillips, Miranda, Johnson, Mark (Eds.), British Social Attitudes: the 23rd Report: Perspectives on a Changing Society (pp. 143-182). SAGE Publications.
  • Kang-Riou, Nicolas, Nolan, Aiofe, Klug, Francesca, O'Cinnneide, Colm (2014). “Highly problematic, to put it mildly”: Experts react to David Cameron’s pledge to repeal the Human Rights Act.
  • Klug, Francesca (2000). The Human Rights Act: a general overview. In Butler, Frances (Ed.), Human Rights for the New Millennium . Kluwer Law International.
  • Klug, Francesca (1999). Human rights as a set of secular ethics, or where does the responsibilities bit fit in? Patterns of Prejudice, 33(3), 65-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/003132299128810632
  • Klug, Francesca (2000). Values for a godless age: the history of the Human Rights Act and its political and legal consequences. Penguin Books.
  • Mackay, R. D., Gearty, Conor (2001). On being insane in Jersey - the case of Attorney General v. Jason Prior. Criminal Law Review, (July), 560-563.
  • Wildbore, Helen, Klug, Francesca (2011). Replacing the Human Rights Act with a weaker British Bill of Rights would send a sign to the international community that we are no longer serious about human rights.
    • LSE IDEAS
  • Oliver, Tim (22 January 2016) The UK needs a devolved government for London. Democratic Audit Blog. picture_as_pdf
    • LSE London
  • Scanlon, Kathleen (2014). Liberalise the planning process.
  • Whitehead, Christine M E (2013). Regulation and the Private Rented Sector. PRS Update, 34 - 35.
    • Law School
  • Bridge, Michael G. (Ed.) (2010). Benjamin's sale of goods. Sweet & Maxwell.
  • Bridge, Michael G. (Ed.) (2016). Benjamin's sale of goods. Sweet & Maxwell.
  • Scott, Andrew (Ed.) (2010). Broadcasting. Butterworths (Firm).
  • Cambridge Socio-Legal Group (2007). Death, euthanasia and the medical profession. In Brooks-Gordon, Belinda, Ebtehaj, Fatemeh, Herring, Jonathon, Johnson, Martin, Richards, Martin (Eds.), Death Rites and Rights (pp. 37-55). Hart Publishing.
  • Summers, Andrew, Goudkamp, James, Wilmot-Smith, Frederick (Eds.) (2015). Defences in Tort. Hart Publishing.
  • Loughlin, Martin, Gelfand, M. David, Young, Ken (Eds.) (1985). Half a century of municipal decline, 1935-1985. George Allen & Unwin Ltd.
  • Moloney, Niamh, Ferran, Eilís, Payne, Jennifer (Eds.) (2015). The Oxford handbook of financial regulation. Oxford University Press.
  • Morse, Geoffrey, Worthington, Sarah (Eds.) (2010). Palmer's company law. Sweet & Maxwell.
  • Morse, Geoffrey, Worthington, Sarah (Eds.) (2009). Palmer's company law: annotated guide to the Companies Act 2006. Sweet & Maxwell.
  • Le Sueur, Andrew, Sunkin, Maurice, Murkens, Jo Eric Khushal (Eds.) (2016). Public law: text, cases and materials. Oxford University Press.
  • The British Academy (2003). The demise of local government. In Bogdanor, Vernon (Ed.), The British Constitution in the Twentieth Century (pp. 521-556). Oxford University Press.
  • Addy, Caroline, Helme, Ian, Starte, Harvey, Scott, Andrew, Griffiths, Jonathan (2010). Carter-Ruck on libel and privacy. LexisNexis (Firm).
  • Ahdash, Fatima (2020). Childhood radicalisation and parental extremism: how should family law respond? Insights from a Local Authority v X, Y and Z. In Rehman, Javaid, Shahid, Ayesha, Foster, Steve (Eds.), The Asian Yearbook of Human Rights and Humanitarian Law . Brill Academic Publishers. picture_as_pdf
  • Ahdash, Fatima (2020). Examining the interaction between family law and counter-terrorism in the UK in recent years [Doctoral thesis]. London School of Economics and Political Science. https://doi.org/10.21953/lse.00004306
  • Ahdash, Fatima (2018). The interaction between family law and counter-terrorism: a critical examination of the radicalisation cases in the family courts. Child and Family Law Quarterly, 2018, 389 - 414. picture_as_pdf
  • Armstrong, Kenneth, Kilpatrick, Claire (2007). Law, governance, or new governance - the changing open method of coordination. Columbia Journal of European Law, 13(3), 649-678.
  • Auckland, Cressida (2021). Blackstone's statutes on medical law. Oxford University Press.
  • Auckland, Cressida Claire (2016). Muddying the waters of end of life decision-making: Tracey and the encroachment of law on clinical judgment. Elder Law Journal, 6(3), 264-272.
  • Auckland, Cressida Claire, Goold, Imogen (2020). Claiming in contract for wrongful conception. Law Quarterly Review, 136, 45-51. picture_as_pdf
  • Baldwin, Robert (2004). The new punitive regulation. Modern Law Review, 67(3), 351-383. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2004.00491.x
  • Baldwin, Robert, Black, Julia, Cave, Martin (2005). A legal services board: roles and operationalising issues. Department for Constitutional Affairs, UK Government.
  • Beale, Hugh, Bridge, Michael G., Gullifer, Louise, Lomnicka, Eva (2007). The law of personal property security. Oxford University Press.
  • Beale, Hugh, Bridge, Michael G., Gullifer, Louise, Lomnicka, Eva (2012). The law of security and title-based financing. Oxford University Press.
  • Beecham, J. H., Birnberg, Benedict, Griffith, J. A. G. (1971). Letter to the editor: availability of legal aid.
  • Benjamin, Joanna (2002). English law. In Potok, Richard (Ed.), Cross Border Collateral: Legal Risk and Conflict of Laws . LexisNexis Butterworths.
  • Black, Julia (2010). Appendix A: a review of enforcement techniques. In Criminal Liability in Regulatory Contexts (pp. 150-186). Stationery Office.
  • Black, Julia (2011). Calibrating regulation. Legal Services Board.
  • Black, Julia (2003). Enrolling actors in regulatory systems: examples from UK financial services regulation. Public Law, 2003(Spring), 63-91.
  • Black, Julia (2010). Risk based regulation. In The Future of the Legal Services: Emerging Thinking (pp. 5-10). Legal Services Board.
  • Black, Julia (2007). Tensions in the regulatory state. Public Law, 2007(Spring), 58-73.
  • Blackwell, Michael (2017). RFC 2012 Plc (in liquidation) (formerly The Rangers Football Club Plc) v Advocate General for Scotland: Discerning the goal of the legislation. British Tax Review, (4), 398-403.
  • Blackwell, Michael (2020). Finance Act 2020 Notes: Section 15: loan charge not to apply to loans or quasi-loans made before 9 December 2010; Section 16: election for loan charge to be split over three tax years; Schedule 2: the loan charge: consequential amendments; Section 17: loan charge reduced where underlying liability disclosed but unenforceable; Section 18: relief from interest on tax payable by a person subject to the loan charge; Section 19: minor amendments relating to the loan charge; Section 20: repaying sums paid to HMRC under agreements relating to certain loans etc; Section 21: operation of the scheme. British Tax Review, 2020(4), 414 - 427. picture_as_pdf
  • Blackwell, Michael (2017). Starting out on a judicial career: gender diversity and the appointment of Recorders, Circuit Judges and Deputy High Court Judges 1996—2016. Journal of Law and Society, 44(4), 586-619. https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12059
  • Blackwell, Michael (2015). Taking silk: an empirical study of the award of Queen’s Counsel status 1981-2015. Modern Law Review, 78(6), 971 - 1003. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12157
  • Bomhoff, Jacco (2013). Balancing constitutional rights: the origins and meanings of postwar legal discourse. Cambridge University Press.
  • Bowling, Ben, Iyer, Shruti, Reiner, Robert, Sheptycki, James (2016). Policing: past, present, and future. In Matthews, Roger (Ed.), What is to Be Done About Crime and Punishment? Towards a 'Public Criminology' (pp. 123-158). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57228-8
  • Bradley, David (2006). Family law. In Smits, Jan M. (Ed.), Elgar Encyclopaedia of Comparative Law (pp. 259-272). Edward Elgar.
  • Braithwaite, Jo (2010). Diversity staff and the dynamics of diversity policy-making in large law firms. Legal Ethics, 13(2), 141-163. https://doi.org/10.5235/146072810793817204
  • Braithwaite, Jo (2010). The strategic use of demand-side diversity pressure in the solicitors' profession. Journal of Law and Society, 37(3), 442-465. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6478.2010.00514.x
  • Braithwaite, Jo (2018). Thirty years of ultra vires: local authorities, national courts and the global derivatives markets. Current Legal Problems, 71(1), 369 – 402. https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/cuy005 picture_as_pdf
  • Braithwaite, Jo (2011). The inherent limits of ‘legal devices’: lessons for the public sector's central counterparty prescription for the OTC derivatives markets. European Business Organization Law Review, 12(01), 87-119. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1566752911100038
  • Braithwaite, Jo, Murphy, David (2019). Improving resolvability: partial property transfers and central counterparties. Capital Markets Law Journal, 14(4), 431 - 450. https://doi.org/10.1093/cmlj/kmz016 picture_as_pdf
  • Bridge, Michael G. (2003). Collectivity, management of estates and the pari passu rule in winding-up. In Armour, John, Bennett, Howard (Eds.), Vulnerable Transactions in Corporate Insolvency (pp. 1-36). Hart Publishing.
  • Bridge, Michael G. (2008). Compensation for commercial agents in the House of Lords. European Review of Contract Law, 4(1), 31-39. https://doi.org/10.1515/ercl.4.1.31
  • Bridge, Michael G. (2001). The Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999. Edinburgh Law Review, 5(1), 85-102.
  • Bridge, Michael G. (2006). Do we need a new Sale of Goods Act? In Lowry, John, Mistelis, Loukas (Eds.), Commercial Law: Perspectives and Practice . LexisNexis Butterworths.
  • Bridge, Michael G. (2009). England and Wales. In Sigman, Harry C., Kieninger, Eva-Maria (Eds.), Cross-Border Security Over Receivables (pp. 147-180). Sellier European Law Publishers.
  • Bridge, Michael G. (2001). English conflicts rules for transfer of movables: a contract-based approach? In Bridge, Michael G., Stevens, Robert (Eds.), Cross-Border Security and Insolvency (pp. 123-144). Oxford University Press.
  • Bridge, Michael G. (2002). The English law of real security. European Review of Private Law, 10(4), 483-508.
  • Bridge, Michael G. (2007). Insolvency. In Burrows, Andrew (Ed.), English Private Law (pp. 1443-1526). Oxford University Press.
  • Bridge, Michael G. (2000). Insolvency. In Birks, Peter (Ed.), English Private Law (pp. 639-723). Oxford University Press.
  • Bridge, Michael G. (2004). Insolvency. In Birks, Peter (Ed.), English Private Law: Second Cumulative Updating Supplement (pp. 179-206). Oxford University Press.
  • Bridge, Michael G. (2013). Insolvency. In Burrows, Andrew (Ed.), English Private Law . Oxford University Press.
  • Bridge, Michael G. (2006). The Law Commission's proposals for the reform of corporate security interests. In Getzler, Joshua, Payne, Jennifer (Eds.), Company Charges: Spectrum and Beyond (pp. 267-290). Oxford University Press.
  • Bridge, Michael G. (2002). Personal property law. Oxford University Press.
  • Bridge, Michael G. (1996). Personal property law. Blackstone Press (London, England).
  • Bridge, Michael G. (1993). Personal property law. Blackstone Press (London, England).
  • Bridge, Michael G. (2015). Personal property law. Oxford University Press.
  • Bridge, Michael G. (2003). The evolution of common law in the United Kingdom and the influence of European law. In Bisson, Alain-François, Perret, Louis (Eds.), Évolution des Systèmes Juridiques, Bijuridisme et Commerce International . Wilson & Lafleur.
  • Bridge, Michael G. (2002). The future of English private transactional law. Current Legal Problems, 55(1), 191-222. https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/55.1.191
  • Bridge, Michael G. (2003). The future of English private transactional law. Europa e Diritto Privato, 2003(1), 87-122.
  • Bridge, Michael G. (2007). The international sale of goods: law and practice. Oxford University Press.
  • Bridge, Michael G. (2009). The proprietary aspects of assignment and choice of law. Law Quarterly Review, 125, 671-698.
  • Brown, Edward, Worthington, Sarah (2009). Directors' terms of service. In Mortimore, Simon (Ed.), Company Directors: Duties, Liabilities and Remedies (pp. 195-218). Oxford University Press.
  • Brown, Edward, Worthington, Sarah (2009). Termination of appointment of directors. In Mortimore, Simon (Ed.), Company Directors: Duties, Liabilities and Remedies (pp. 175-194). Oxford University Press.
  • Chinkin, Christine (2010). International humanitarian law, human rights and the UK courts. In Boisson de Chazournes, Laurence, Kohen, Marcelo G. (Eds.), International Law and the Quest for Its Implementation: Liber Amicorum Vera Gowlland-Debbas . Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
  • Clark, Martin (2020). The 'international' and 'domestic' in British legal thought from Gentili to Lauterpacht [Doctoral thesis]. London School of Economics and Political Science.
  • Collins, Hugh (2004). Compensation for the manner of dismissal. Industrial Law Journal, 33(2), 152-158. https://doi.org/10.1093/ilj/33.2.152
  • Collins, Hugh (2003). Employment law. Oxford University Press.
  • Collins, Hugh (2010). Employment law. Oxford University Press.
  • Collins, Hugh (1992). Justice in dismissal: the law of termination of employment. Oxford University Press.
  • Collins, Hugh (2007). Legal responses to the standard form contract of employment. Industrial Law Journal, 36(1), 2-18. https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwl037
  • Collins, Hugh (2011). Theories of rights as justifications for labour law. In Davidov, Guy, Langille, Brian (Eds.), The Idea of Labour Law (pp. 137-155). Oxford University Press.
  • Collins, Hugh (2003). The law of contract. LexisNexis Butterworths.
  • Collins, Hugh (1993). The law of contract. Butterworths (Firm).
  • Collins, Hugh (1986). The law of contract. Weidenfeld and Nicolson (Firm).
  • Collins, Hugh (1997). The law of contract. Butterworths (Firm).
  • Collins, Hugh (2006). The protection of civil liberties in the workplace. Modern Law Review, 69(4), 619-631. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2006.00602.x
  • Cranston, Ross (2025). Judging. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/9780191890994.001.0001
  • Cranston, Ross (2002). Principles of banking law. Oxford University Press.
  • Cranston, Ross, Avgouleas, Emilios, van Zwieten, Kristin, Hare, Christopher, van Sante, Theodor (2018). Principles of banking law. Oxford University Press.
  • Cunliffe, Philip, Hoare, George, Jones, Lee, Ramsay, Peter (2023). Taking control: sovereignty and democracy after Brexit. Polity Press.
  • Cutts, Tatiana (2020). Materially identical to mistaken payment. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, 33(1), 31 - 57. https://doi.org/10.1017/cjlj.2019.29 description
  • Cutts, Tatiana (2019). Smart contracts and consumers. West Virginia Law Review, 122(2), 389 - 446. picture_as_pdf
  • Cutts, Tatiana (2019). Use value and interest in unjust enrichment. Lloyd's Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly, 2019(3), 410 - 432. picture_as_pdf
  • Davies, Paul L. (2006). Enron and corporate law reform in the UK and the European Community. In Lowry, John, Mistelis, Loukas (Eds.), Commercial Law: Perspectives and Practice . LexisNexis Butterworths.
  • Davies, Paul L., Freedland, Mark (2000). Employees, workers and the autonomy of labour law. In Collins, Hugh, Davies, Paul L., Rideout, Roger (Eds.), Legal Regulation of the Employment Relation (pp. 267-286). Kluwer Law International.
  • Davies, Paul L., Freedland, Mark (2007). Towards a flexible labour market: labour legislation and regulation since the 1990s. Oxford University Press.
  • Davies, Paul L., Kilpatrick, Claire (2004). UK worker representation after single channel. Industrial Law Journal, 33(2), 121-151. https://doi.org/10.1093/ilj/33.2.121
  • Davies, Paul L., Milman, David, Morse, Geoffrey (2001). Limited liability partnership act 2000. In Beesley, Christine, Collet, Kerry, Dye, Philip, Stopford, Jean, Trainor, Shauna, Zelazowski, Damian (Eds.), Current Law Statutes 2000 (pp. 12-1). Sweet & Maxwell.
  • Dawson, Mark, de Witte, Floris (2013). Constitutional balance in the EU after the Euro-crisis. Modern Law Review, 76(5), 817-844. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12037
  • Duxbury, Neil (2012). Elements of legislation. Cambridge University Press.
  • Duxbury, Neil (2005). English jurisprudence between Austin and Hart. Virginia Law Review, 91(1), 1-91.
  • Duxbury, Neil (2004). Frederick Pollock and the English juristic tradition. Oxford University Press.
  • Duxbury, Neil (2001). Jurists and judges: an essay on influence. Hart Publishing.
  • Duxbury, Neil (2009). Lord Wright and innovative traditionalism. (LSE law, society and economy working papers 11-2009). Department of Law, London School of Economics and Political Science.
  • Duxbury, Neil (2004). Why English jurisprudence is analytical. Current Legal Problems, 57(1), 1-52. https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/57.1.1
  • Duxbury, Neil (2017). Custom as law in English law. Cambridge Law Journal, 76(2), 337 - 359. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197317000253
  • Duxbury, Neil (2017). The outer limits of English judicial review. Public Law, 235-248. picture_as_pdf
  • Dworkin, Ronald, Griffith, J. A. G., Hewitt, Patricia, Hill, Christopher, Hodgkin, Dorothy, Hodgkin, Thomas, Miliband, Ralph, Sapper, Alan, Saville, John & Smythe, Tony et al (1976). Letter to the editor: journalists' right to a fair trial.
  • Ewing, K D, Gearty, Conor (1997). A law too far: Part III of the Police Bill 1997. Civil Liberties Research Unit.
  • Ewing, Keith, Gearty, Conor (2000). The struggle for civil liberties: political freedom and the rule of law in Britain, 1914-1945. Oxford University Press.
  • Finch, Vanessa (2010). Corporate rescue processes: the search for quality and the capacity to resolve. Journal of Business Law, 2010(6), 502-521.
  • Finch, Vanessa (2012). Corporate rescue: a game of three halves. Legal Studies, 32(2), 302-324. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-121X.2012.00230.x
  • Fletcher, Ruth, Fox, Marie, McCandless, Julie (2008). Legal embodiment: analysing the body of healthcare law. Medical Law Review, 16(3), p. 321. https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwn017
  • Fulbrook, Julian (2012). Chandler v Cape Plc: personal injury: liability: negligence. Journal of Personal Injury Law, 2012(3), C135-C139.
  • Fulbrook, Julian (2000). Health and safety: are the levels of damages fair? Federation News, 50(3), 121-133.
  • Fulbrook, Julian (2000). In school and out of school. In Gizzi, Julian, Hancox, Nicholas, Beresford, Neil (Eds.), Butterworths Education Law Manual . Butterworths (Firm).
  • Fulbrook, Julian (2012). Ministry of Defence v AB: civil procedure: personal injury: armed forces. Journal of Personal Injury Law, 2012(3), C173-C178.
  • Fulbrook, Julian (2001). New Labour’s welfare reforms: anything new? Modern Law Review, 64(2), 243-259. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.00318
  • Fulbrook, Julian (2005). Outdoor activities, negligence and the law. Ashgate Dartmouth.
  • Fulbrook, Julian (2011). Personal injury: contributory negligence - rescuers. Journal of Personal Injury Law, Mar, 19-24.
  • Fulbrook, Julian (2009). Peters v East Midlands SHA. Journal of Personal Injury Law, (2), 89-94.
  • Fulbrook, Julian (2013). Selwood v Durham CC: personal injury - health and safety - negligence. Journal of Personal Injury Law, 2013(1), C7-C10.
  • Fulbrook, Julian (2009). Shah v Wasim Ul-Haq. Journal of Personal Injury Law, (4), 189-195.
  • Fulbrook, Julian (2012). Simpson v Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Trust: personal injury - torts - right to damages - equity. Journal of Personal Injury Law, 2012(2), C96-C101.
  • Fulbrook, Julian (2000). Walking the public plank: protecting the safety of visitors to public places. Local Government Chronicle, (6926), p. 12.
  • Fulbrook, Julian (2012). Woodland v Swimming Teachers' Association. Journal of Personal Injury Law, 1, 7-11.
  • Gafni, Ilan (2022). Rethinking the negligence liability of public authorities in English law [Doctoral thesis]. London School of Economics and Political Science. https://doi.org/10.21953/lse.00004397
  • Galanter, Mark, Roberts, Simon (2008). From kinship to magic circle: the London commercial law firm in the twentieth century. International Journal of the Legal Profession, 15(3), 143-178. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695950902804217
  • Gallo, Zelia, Lacey, Nicola, Soskice, David (2014). Comparing serious violent crime in the US and England and Wales: why it matters, and how it can be done. (Law Society and Economy Working Paper Series WP16/2014). London School of Economics and Political Science.
  • Gearty, Conor (2005). 11 September 2001, counter-terrorism and the Human Rights Act. Journal of Law and Society, 32(1), 18-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6478.2005.312_1.x
  • Gearty, Conor (2005). Book review: beyond comparison: sex and discrimination, by Timothy Macklem. Modern Law Review, 68(1), 158-161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2005.533_2.x
  • Gearty, Conor (2001). The Casement treason trial in its legal context. Irish Jurist, 36, 31-42.
  • Gearty, Conor (2004). The Casement treason trial in its legal context. In Daly, Mary E. (Ed.), Roger Casement in Irish and World History (pp. 151-161). Royal Irish Academy.
  • Gearty, Conor (1993). Citizenship and freedom of expression. In Blackburn, Robert (Ed.), Rights of Citizenship (pp. 271-294). Mansell (Firm).
  • Gearty, Conor (2003). Civil liberties and human rights. In Bamforth, Nicholas, Leyland, Peter (Eds.), Public Law in a Multi-Layered Constitution (pp. 371-390). Hart Publishing.
  • Gearty, Conor (2011). The Commission looking into the possibility of a British bill of rights is supposed to support diversity and inclusivity, but is fatally compromised by its narrow membership base.
  • Gearty, Conor (2000). Constitutional and human rights law. In Hayton, David J. (Ed.), Law's Future(S): British Legal Developments in the 21st Century (pp. 53-70). Hart Publishing.
  • Gearty, Conor (2011). The Dale Farm case shows that legal authority must be made clear before potentially life-wrecking actions are taken.
  • Gearty, Conor (1994). Freedom of assembly and public order. In McCrudden, Christopher, Chambers, Gerald (Eds.), Individual Rights and the Law in Britain (pp. 39-68). Oxford University Press.
  • Gearty, Conor (1999). The Human Rights Act 1998 and the role of the Strasbourg organs: some preliminary reflections. In Anderson, Gavin W. (Ed.), Rights and Democracy: Essays in Uk-Canadian Constitutionalism (pp. 169-192). Blackstone Press (London, England).
  • Gearty, Conor (2002). The Human Rights Act and the criminal law: an overview of the early case-law. In Boyle, Alan, Himsworth, Chris, Loux, Andrea, MacQueen, Hector (Eds.), Human Rights and Scots Law: Comparative Perspectives on the Incorporation of the Echr (pp. 293-306). Hart Publishing.
  • Gearty, Conor (2011). The Human Rights Act matters – any new “bill of rights” should build on it, not replace it.
  • Gearty, Conor (2000). The Human Rights Act: an overview. In Ewing, Keith (Ed.), Human Rights at Work (pp. 1-23). Institute of Employment Rights.
  • Gearty, Conor (21 September 2021) In legislating for freedom of speech on university campuses, whose opinions will the government protect? Impact of Social Sciences Blog. picture_as_pdf
  • Gearty, Conor (1994). Political violence and civil liberties. In McCrudden, Christopher, Chambers, Gerald (Eds.), Individual Rights and the Law in Britain (pp. 145-178). Oxford University Press.
  • Gearty, Conor (2016). Potential removal of EU nationals from the UK is not incompatible with the Human Rights Act.
  • Gearty, Conor (2004). Principles of human rights adjudication. Oxford University Press.
  • Gearty, Conor (2002). Reconciling Parliamentary democracy and human rights. Law Quarterly Review, 118(Apr), 248-269.
  • Gearty, Conor (2001). Reflections on human rights and civil liberties in light of the United Kingdom's Human Rights Act 1998. University of Richmond Law Review, 35(1), 1-25.
  • Gearty, Conor (2003). Revisiting section 3(1) of the Human Rights Act. Law Quarterly Review, 119(Oct), 551-553.
  • Gearty, Conor (2001). Tort law and the Human Rights Act. In Campbell, Tom, Ewing, Keith, Tomkins, Adam (Eds.), Sceptical Essays on Human Rights (pp. 243-260). Oxford University Press.
  • Gearty, Conor (2005). With a little help from our friends. Index on Censorship, 34(1), 46-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/03064220512331339463
  • Gearty, Conor (1989). The place of private nuisance in a modern law of torts. Cambridge Law Journal, 48(2), 214-242. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000819730010529X
  • Gearty, Conor, Davies, Stephen (2000). Insolvency practice and the Human Rights Act 1998. Jordans (Firm).
  • Gearty, Conor, Ewing, Keith (1994). Democracy or a bill of rights. The Society.
  • Gearty, Conor, Kimbell, J. A. (1995). Terrorism and the rule of law. Civil Liberties Research Unit, King's College.
  • Gearty, Conor (2019). States of denial: what the search for a UK Bill of Rights tells us about human rights protection today. European Human Rights Law Review, picture_as_pdf
  • Gee, Graham, Hazell, Robert, Malleson, Kate, O'Brien, Patrick (2015). The politics of judicial independence in the UK's changing constitution. Cambridge University Press.
  • Gee, Graham, Webber, Grégoire (2019). A conservative disposition and constitutional change. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 39(3), 526 - 552. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqz010 picture_as_pdf
  • Gerner-Beuerle, Carsten (2010). General disclosure arrangements: the European framework. In Gerner-Beuerle, Carsten, Fleet, Stuart (Eds.), Gore-Brown on Companies . Jordans (Firm).
  • Gerner-Beuerle, Carsten (2010). Quoted companies: the European framework. In Gerner-Beuerle, Carsten, Fleet, Stuart (Eds.), Gore-Brown on Companies . Jordans (Firm).
  • Gerner-Beuerle, Carsten (2017). Diffusion of regulatory innovations: the case of corporate governance codes. Journal of Institutional Economics, 13(2), 271-303. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137416000412
  • Griffith, J. A. G. (1969). Book review: a history of English criminal law and its administration from 1750, vol. 4: grappling for control. by L. Radzinowicz [London: Stevens and Sons. 1968. viii and 492 pp. £5 10s.]. British Journal of Criminology, 8(3), 287-288.
  • Griffith, J. A. G. (1962). Book review: administrative law, by H. W. R. Wade, ll.d., reader in English law in the University of Cambridge; professor elect of English law in the University of Oxford. member of the Council on Tribunals. [Oxford: Clarendon Press; O.U.P. 1961. xvi, 282 and (index) 8 pp. 21s. net.]. Cambridge Law Journal, 20(1), 111-113. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197300087031
  • Griffith, J. A. G. (1966). Book review: cases and materials on constitutional and administrative law, by Geoffrey Wilson, m.a., ll.b., of Gray's Inn, barrister-at-law, fellow of Queens' College, Cambridge, lecturer in law in the University of Cambridge. [Cambridge: University Press. 1966. xxv and 609 pp, cloth, 70s. net; paper, 35s. net.]. Cambridge Law Journal, 24(2), 283-284. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197300010965
  • Griffith, J. A. G. (1960). Book review: judicial review of administrative action, by S. A. De Smith, m.a., ph.d., professor of public law in the University of London. [London: Stevens & Sons, Ltd. 1959. xlvii, 468 and (index) 18 pp. £3 10s. net.]. Cambridge Law Journal, 18(2), 228-230. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197300009867
  • Griffith, J. A. G. (1958). Book review: the machinery of local government, by R. M. Jackson, ll.d., solicitor of the Supreme Court, fellow of St. John's College, Cambridge; reader in public law and administration in the University of Cambridge. [London: Macmillan & Co., Ltd. 1958. xii, 353 and (index) 7 pp. 30s. net.]. Cambridge Law Journal, 16(2), 236-238. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000819730000386X
  • Griffith, J. A. G. (1959). Family allowances and National Insurance Act, 1959. Modern Law Review, 22(4), 411-412. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1959.tb00548.x
  • Griffith, J. A. G. (1955). The Franks Committee. Journal of the Society of Public Teachers of Law, 3, 207-219.
  • Griffith, J. A. G. (2000). Here come the judges - can their reputation for independence survive the growth in their powers?
  • Griffith, J. A. G. (1973). Letter to the editor: BBC discussion on Warhol film.
  • Griffith, J. A. G. (1978). Letter to the editor: checks on juries.
  • Griffith, J. A. G. (1980). Letter to the editor: human rights in Britain.
  • Griffith, J. A. G. (1983). Letter to the editor: judicial appointments.
  • Griffith, J. A. G. (1967). Letter to the editor: public matters.
  • Griffith, J. A. G. (1966). Letter to the editor: second thoughts on Plowden.
  • Griffith, J. A. G. (1955). Notes of cases: administrative discretion and the Courts - the better part of valour. Modern Law Review, 18(2), 159-163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1955.tb00292.x
  • Griffith, J. A. G. (2001). Nothing like the sun.
  • Griffith, J. A. G. (1989). The Official Secrets Act 1989. Journal of Law and Society, 16(3), 273-290.
  • Griffith, J. A. G. (1960). Reports of committees: first report of the Council of Tribunals. Modern Law Review, 23(6), 660-662. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1960.tb00633.x
  • Griffith, J. A. G. (1959). Statutes: The Local Government Act, 1958. Modern Law Review, 22(3), 297-301. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1959.tb00528.x
  • Griffith, J. A. G. (1959). Tribunals and inquiries. Modern Law Review, 22(2), 125-145. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1959.tb02165.x
  • Griffith, J. A. G. (1998). Who will referee the refs?: the growing dangers of judicial adventurism.
  • Griffith, J. A. G. (1950). The constitutional significance of delegated legislation in England. Michigan Law Review, 48(8), 1079-1120.
  • Griffith, J. A. G., O'Higgins, Paul, Tapper, Colin, Thornberry, Cedric, Wedderburn, K. W. (1965). Letter to the editor: question of principle.
  • Griffiths, Martin, Worthington, Sarah (2009). Appointment of directors. In Mortimore, Simon (Ed.), Company Directors: Duties, Liabilities and Remedies (pp. 141-174). Oxford University Press.
  • Harlow, Carol (2000). Export, import: the ebb and flow of English public law. Public Law, Summer, 240-253.
  • Hazell, Robert, O'Brien, Patrick (2016). Meaningful dialogue: judicial engagement with parliamentary committees at Westminster. Public Law,
  • Heyvaert, Veerle (2013). Regulatory competition: accounting for the transnational dimension of environmental regulation. Journal of Environmental Law, 25(1), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqs019
  • Heyvaert, Veerle (2013). What's in a name? The covenant of mayors as transnational environmental regulation. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law, 22(1), 78-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12009
  • Horder, Jeremy (2025). Corporate criminal liability under the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023. Legal Studies, 45(1), 133 - 148. https://doi.org/10.1017/lst.2024.46 picture_as_pdf
  • Hovell, Devika (2023). The "common law method": British approaches to the development of international law. British Yearbook of International Law, https://doi.org/10.1093/bybil/brad014 picture_as_pdf
  • Humphreys, Stephen (2019). Data: the given. In Hohmann, Jessie, Joyce, Daniel (Eds.), International Law's Objects . Oxford University Press. picture_as_pdf
  • Husovec, Martin (2017). The ultimate practitioner’s guide to online enforcement of rights in the United Kingdom. Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, 12(6), 528 -529. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpx044
  • Ibáñez Colomo, Pablo (2009). Ofcom’s proposal to regulate access to premium television content: some thoughts. (EUI working papers LAW 2009/03). European University Institute.
  • Ibáñez Colomo, Pablo (2016). Appreciability and de minimis in Article 102 TFEU. Journal of European Competition Law and Practice, https://doi.org/10.1093/jeclap/lpw072
  • Jackson, Emily (2000). Abortion, autonomy and prenatal diagnosis. Social and Legal Studies, 9(4), 467-494. https://doi.org/10.1177/096466390000900401
  • Jackson, Emily (2008). The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill 2007. Expert Review of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 3(4), 429-431. https://doi.org/10.1586/17474108.3.4.429
  • Jackson, Emily (2006). Informed consent and the impotence of tort. In McLean, Sheila A. M. (Ed.), First Do No Harm: Law, Ethics and Healthcare (pp. 273-286). Ashgate Dartmouth.
  • Jackson, Emily (2012). Law and the regulation of medicines. Hart Publishing.
  • Jackson, Emily (2006). Medical law: text, cases and materials. Oxford University Press.
  • Jackson, Emily (2009). Medical law: text, cases and materials. Oxford University Press.
  • Jackson, Emily (2013). Medical law: text, cases and materials. Oxford University Press.
  • Jackson, Emily (2007). Prisoners, their partners and the right to family life. Child and Family Law Quarterly, 19(2), 239-246.
  • Jackson, Emily (2003). Public opinion and the regulation of conception. In Morgan, W. John, Livingstone, Stephen (Eds.), Law and Opinion in Twentieth-Century Britain and Ireland (pp. 84-108). Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Jackson, Emily (2013). Regulating embryo research: a regulator’s perspective. In Flear, Mark, Farrell, Anne-Maree, Hervey, Tamara K., Murphy, Thérèse (Eds.), European law and New Health Technologies (pp. 275-281). Oxford University Press.
  • Jackson, Emily (2006). Rethinking the preconception welfare principle. In Horsey, Kirsty, Biggs, Hazel (Eds.), Human Fertilisation and Embryology: Reproducing Regulation (pp. 47-67). Routledge-Cavendish.
  • Jackson, Emily (2006). What is a parent? In Diduck, Alison, O'Donovan, Katherine (Eds.), Feminist Perspectives on Family Law (pp. 59-74). Routledge-Cavendish.
  • Jackson, Emily (2004). Whose death is it anyway? Euthanasia and the medical profession. Current Legal Problems, 57(1), 415-442. https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/57.1.415
  • Jackson, Emily (2012). The minimally conscious state and treatment withdrawal: W v M. Journal of Medical Ethics, 39(9), 559-561. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2012-100981
  • Jackson, Emily, Abdalla, Hossam (2011). IVF birth data presentation: its impact on clinical practice and patient choice. In Ebtehaj, Fatemeh, Herring, Jonathan, Johnson, Martin, Richards, Martin (Eds.), Birth Rites and Rights (pp. 271-284). Hart Publishing.
  • Jackson, Emily, Keown, John (2011). Debating euthanasia. Hart Publishing.
  • Jackson, Emily (2013). Compensating egg donors. In Madhok, Sumi, Phillips, Anne, Wilson, Kalpana (Eds.), Gender, Agency and Coercion (pp. 181-194). Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Jackson, Emily (2018). From ‘doctor knows best’ to dignity: placing adults who lack capacity at the centre of decisions about their medical treatment. Modern Law Review, 81(2), 247 - 281. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12328
  • Jackson, Emily (2018). The ambiguities of ‘social’ egg freezing and the challenges of informed consent. Biosocieties, 13(1), 21 - 40. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41292-017-0044-5
  • Jackson, Emily, Feldschreiber, P, Breckenridge, A (2017). Regulatory consequences of “Brexit” for the development of medicinal products. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 102, 183-184. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.706
  • Jacob, Joseph (2007). Civil justice in the age of human rights. Ashgate Dartmouth.
  • Jenkins, Tiffany (2010). Contesting human remains in museum collections: the crisis of cultural authority. Routledge.
  • Johnson, Mark, Gearty, Conor (2007). Civil liberties and the challenge of terrorism. In Park, Alison, Curtice, John, Thomson, Katarina, Phillips, Miranda, Johnson, Mark (Eds.), British Social Attitudes: the 23rd Report: Perspectives on a Changing Society (pp. 143-182). SAGE Publications.
  • Kalintiri, Andriani (2013). The right to property: new ammunition for competitionlitigation? Competition Law Journal, 4, 416-427.
  • Keenan, Bernard (2015). Going 'below the waterline': the paradoxical regulation of secret surveillance in the UK. (LSE Law Policy Briefing Series 9). London School of Economics and Political Science.
  • Kershaw, David (2016). The British Constitution’s failure to manage existential risk: back to basics.
  • Kershaw, David (2015). Corporate law and self-regulation. (LSE Law, Society and Economy Working Paper Series). London School of Economics and Political Science. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2574201
  • Kershaw, David (2005). Does it matter how the law thinks about corporate opportunities? Legal Studies, 25(4), 533-558. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-121X.2005.tb00683.x
  • Kershaw, David (2005). Evading Enron: taking principles too seriously in accounting regulation. Modern Law Review, 68(4), 594-625. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2005.00552.x
  • Kershaw, David (2005). Lost in translation: corporate opportunities in comparative perspective. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 25(4), 603-627. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqi032
  • Kershaw, David (2006). Waiting for Enron: the unstable equilibrium of auditor independence regulation. Journal of Law and Society, 33(3), 388-420. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6478.2006.00364.x
  • Kershaw, David (2007). The illusion of importance: reconsidering the UK's takeover defence prohibition. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 56(2), 267-307. https://doi.org/10.1093/iclq/lei165
  • Kilpatrick, Claire (2007). Age, retirement and the employment contract. Industrial Law Journal, 36(1), 119-135. https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwl044
  • Kilpatrick, Claire (2009). The ECJ and labour law: a 2008 retrospective. Industrial Law Journal, 38(2), 180-208. https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwp012
  • Kilpatrick, Claire (2003). Has New Labour reconfigured employment legislation? Industrial Law Journal, 32(3), 135-163. https://doi.org/10.1093/ilj/32.3.135
  • Kilpatrick, Claire (2008). The new UK retirement regime, employment law and pensions. Industrial Law Journal, 37(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwm037
  • Kilpatrick, Claire, Freedland, Mark (2004). The United Kingdom how is EU governance transformative? In Sciarra, Silvana, Davies, Paul L., Freedland, Mark (Eds.), Employment Policy and the Regulation of Part-Time Work in the European Union: A Comparative Analysis (pp. 299 - 357). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511495045.011
  • Lacey, Nicola (2007). Character, capacity, outcome: towards a framework for assessing the shifting pattern of criminal responsibility in modern English law. In Dubber, Markus D., Farmer, Lindsay (Eds.), Modern Histories of Crime and Punishment (pp. 14-41). Stanford University Press.
  • Lacey, Nicola (1994). Criminal justice. Oxford University Press.
  • Lacey, Nicola (2014). Gouvernement-manageur et citoyens-consommateurs. Le cas du Criminal Justice Act 1991. Tracés, 2(27), 183-210.
  • Lacey, Nicola (1994). Government as manager, citizen as consumer: the case of Criminal Justice Act 1991. Modern Law Review, 57(4), 534-554.
  • Lacey, Nicola (2001). In search of the responsible subject: history, philosophy and social sciences in criminal law theory. Modern Law Review, 64(3), 350-371. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.00325
  • Lacey, Nicola (2008). The prisoners' dilemma: political economy and punishment in contemporary democracies. Cambridge University Press.
  • Lacey, Nicola, Soskice, David, Hope, David (2018). Understanding the determinants of penal policy: crime, culture, and comparative political economy. Annual Review of Criminology, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-032317-091942
  • Lacey, Nicola, Wells, Celia (1998). Reconstructing criminal law: text and materials. Butterworths (Firm).
  • Lacey, Nicola, Wells, Celia, Meure, Dirk (1990). Reconstructing criminal law: critical perspectives on crime and the criminal process. Weidenfeld and Nicolson (Firm).
  • Le Sueur, Andrew, Sunkin, Maurice, Murkens, Jo (2013). Public law: text, cases and materials. Oxford University Press.
  • Le Sueur, Andrew, Sunkin, Maurice, Murkens, Jo Eric Khushal (2010). Public law: text, cases and materials. Oxford University Press.
  • Liberman, Dvora (2018). Custodians of continuity in an era of change: an oral history of the everyday lives of Crown Court clerks between 1972 and 2015. Legal Information Management, 18(03), 120-127. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1472669618000282 picture_as_pdf
  • Lobban, Michael (2014). Habeas corpus et Rule of law en Angleterre, vers 1885-1914‪. Revue d’histoire du XIXe siècle, 48(1), 77-91.
  • Lobban, Michael (2012). Thomas Hobbes and the common law. In Dyzenhaus, David (Ed.), Hobbes and the Law (pp. 39-67). Cambridge University Press.
  • Lobban, Michael (2012). Tort law, regulation and river pollution: the Rivers Pollution Prevention Act and its implementation, 1876-1951. In Arvind, T. T., Steele, Jenny (Eds.), Tort Law and the Legislature (pp. 329-352). Hart Publishing.
  • Lobban, Michael (1991). The common law and English jurisprudence, 1760-1850. Oxford University Press.
  • Lobban, Michael (2012). The politics of English law in the nineteenth century. In Brand, Paul, Getzler, Joshua (Eds.), Judges and Judging in the History of the Common Law and Civil Law: From Antiquity to Modern Times (pp. 102-137). Cambridge University Press.
  • Loughlin, Martin (2018). The British constitution: thoughts on the cause of the present discontents. New Zealand Journal of Public and International Law, 16(2).
  • Loughlin, Martin (2007). Großbritannien. In von Bogdandy, Armin, Cruz Villalón, Pedro, Huber, Peter M. (Eds.), Handbuch Ius Publicum Europaeum (pp. 217-272). C.F. Müller Verlag.
  • Loughlin, Martin (2010). Judicial independence and judicial review in constitutional democracies: a note on Hamilton and Tocqueville. In Forsyth, Christopher, Elliott, Mark, Jhaveri, Swati, Ramsden, Michael, Hill, Anne Scully (Eds.), Effective Judicial Review: a Cornerstone of Good Governance (pp. 9-18). Oxford University Press.
  • Loughlin, Martin (1996). Legality and locality: the role of law in central-local government relations. Oxford University Press.
  • Loughlin, Martin (2014). Modernism in British public law, 1919-79. Public Law, Jan, 56-67.
  • Loughlin, Martin (1992). Public law and political theory. Oxford University Press.
  • Loughlin, Martin (2008). Reflections on 'the idea of public law'. In Christodoulidis, Emilios, Tierney, Stephen (Eds.), Public Law and Politics: the Scope and Limits of Constitutionalism (pp. 47-68). Ashgate Dartmouth.
  • Loughlin, Martin (2006). Towards a republican revival? Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 26(2), 425-437. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gql010
  • Loughlin, Martin (2009). Why the history of English administrative law is not written. In Dyzenhaus, David, Hunt, Murray, Huscroft, Grant (Eds.), A Simple Common Lawyer: Essays in Honour of Michael Taggart (pp. 151-178). Hart Publishing.
  • Loughlin, Martin (2007). The constitutional thought of the levellers. Current Legal Problems, 60(1), 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/60.1.1
  • Loughlin, Martin (2023). Brexit and the British Constitution. In Jaeger, Thomas, Lehmann, Matthias, Somek, Alexander, Waibel, Michael (Eds.), Consolidating Brexit: The Future of EU/UK Cooperation (pp. 265 - 283). Jan Sramek Verlag. picture_as_pdf
  • Loughlin, Martin (2023). The British constitution in Ackerman's worldview: a critique. In Dani, Marco, Goldoni, Marco, Menéndez, Agustín J. (Eds.), The Legitimacy of European Constitutional Orders: A Comparative Inquiry (pp. 158 - 176). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781803928890.00016 picture_as_pdf
  • Loughlin, Martin (2017). Evolution and Gestalt of the state in the United Kingdom. In Cassese, Sabino, von Bogdandy, Armin, Huber, Peter (Eds.), The Max Planck Handbooks in European Public Law: The Administrative State . Oxford University Press.
  • Loughlin, Martin (2023). Laski’s materialist analysis of the British Constitution. In Goldoni, Marco, Wilkinson, Michael A. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook on the Material Constitution (pp. 64 - 75). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009023764.005 picture_as_pdf
  • Loughlin, Martin (2019). What would John Griffith have made of Jonathan Sumption's Reith Lectures? Political Quarterly, 90(4), 785-793. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12771 picture_as_pdf
  • Lucey, Mary (2012). Europeanisation and the restraint of trade doctrine. Legal Studies, 32(4), 623-641. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-121X.2012.00236.x
  • Lucey, Mary Catherine (2012). The interface between competition law and the restraint of trade doctrine for professionals: understanding the evolution of problems and proposing solutions for courts in England and Wales [Doctoral thesis]. London School of Economics and Political Science. picture_as_pdf
  • Lynskey, Orla (2018). The power of providence: the role of platforms in leveraging the legibility of users to accentuate inequality. In Moore, Martin, Tambini, Damian (Eds.), Digital Dominance: Implications and Risks . Oxford University Press. picture_as_pdf
  • Mackay, R. D., Gearty, Conor (2001). On being insane in Jersey - the case of Attorney General v. Jason Prior. Criminal Law Review, (July), 560-563.
  • Malleson, Kate (2002). Another nail in the coffin? New Law Journal, 152(7052), 1573-1577.
  • Malleson, Kate (2002). Safeguarding judicial impartiality. Legal Studies, 22(1), 53-70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-121X.2002.tb00579.x
  • Mantouvalou, Virginia, Collins, Hugh (2009). Private life and dismissal: Pay v UK - Application No 32792/05, [2009] IRLR 139 (ECtHR). Industrial Law Journal, 38(1), 133-138. https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwp004
  • Marks, Susan (2019). A false tree of liberty: human rights in radical thought. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199675456.001.0001
  • Martin, Richard (2013). The recent supergrass controversy have we learnt from the troubled past? Criminal Law Review, 273-289.
  • Masterman, Roger, Murkens, Jo Eric Khushal (2013). Skirting supremacy and subordination: the constitutional authority of the United Kingdom Supreme Court. Public Law, 2013(Oct), 800-820.
  • McCandless, Julie (2011). The changing form of birth registration? In Ebtehaj, Fatemeh, Herring, Johnathan, Johnson, Martin, Richards, Martin (Eds.), Birth Rites and Rights (pp. 187-204). Hart Publishing.
  • McCandless, Julie (2005). Recognising family diversity: the ‘boundaries’ of RE G. Feminist Legal Studies, 13(3), 323-336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-005-9006-6
  • McCandless, Julie (2017). Reforming birth registration law in England and Wales? Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online, 4, 52-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2017.07.001
  • McCandless, Julie (2008). Status and anomaly: Re D (contact and parental responsibility: lesbian mothers and known father) [2006] EWHC 2 (Fam), [2006] 1 FCR 556. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 30(1), 63-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/09649060802124836
  • McDonagh, Luke (8 October 2015) Chocolate war in the court room as KitKat fingers and Lindt bears take the stand. The Conversation.
  • McDonagh, Luke (22 July 2014) Exploring perspectives of the unified patent court and unitary patent within the business and legal communities: a report for the UK Intellectual Property Office. Kluwer Patent blog.
  • McDonagh, Luke (2011). Headlines and hyperlinks: UK copyright law post-Infopaq. Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property, 1(2), 184 - 187. https://doi.org/10.4337/qmjip.2011.02.05
  • McDonagh, Luke (25 February 2016) UK should postpone ratification of Unified Patent Court Agreement. Kluwer Patent blog.
  • McDonagh, Luke, Helmers, Christian (2013). Patent litigation in England and Wales and the issue-based approach to costs. Civil Justice Quarterly, 32(3), 369 - 384.
  • Melissaris, Emmanuel (2012). Property offences as crimes of injustice. Criminal Law and Philosophy, 6(2), 149-166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-012-9146-0
  • Melissaris, Emmanuel (2011). We should be cautious about televising trials as they would do little to bolster public faith in the judicial system and provide for open justice: alternative solutions should be sought.
  • Melissaris, Emmanuel (2007). The concept of appropriation and the offence of theft. Modern Law Review, 70(4), 581-597. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2007.00653.x
  • Micheler, Eva (2007). English and German securities law: a thesis in doctrinal path dependence. Law Quarterly Review, 123(Apr), 251-285.
  • Micheler, Eva (2007). Property in securities: a comparative study. Cambridge University Press.
  • Micheler, Eva, Prentice, Dan (2000). Joint ventures in English and German law. Hart Publishing.
  • Micheler, Eva (2015). Custody chains and asset values: why crypto-securities are worth contemplating. Cambridge Law Journal, 74(3), 505-533.
  • Micheler, Eva, Whaley, Anna Rose (2020). Regulatory technology: replacing law with computer code. European Business Organization Law Review, 21(2), 349 - 377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40804-019-00151-1 picture_as_pdf
  • Moloney, Niamh (2018). Capital markets union, third countries and equivalence: law, markets and Brexit. In Busch, Danny, Avgouleas, Emilios, Ferrarini, Guido (Eds.), Capital Markets Union in Europe (pp. 97-139). Oxford University Press.
  • Moloney, Niamh (2011). Regulating the retail markets: law, policy, and the financial crisis. Current Legal Problems, 63(1), 375-447. https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/63.1.375
  • Moloney, Niamh (2018). The age of ESMA: governing EU financial markets. Hart Publishing.
  • Morse, Geoffrey, Davies, Paul L., Fletcher, Ian F., Milman, David., Morris, Richard, Bennett, David A. (2001). Palmer's limited liability partnership law. Sweet & Maxwell.
  • Mulcahy, Linda (2013). Imagining alternative visions of justice: an exploration of the controversy surrounding Stirling Lee's depictions of Justitia in nineteenth-century Liverpool. Law, Culture and the Humanities, 9(2), 311-329. https://doi.org/10.1177/1743872111398064
  • Mulcahy, Linda (2010). Legal architecture: justice, due process and the place of law. Routledge.
  • Mulcahy, Linda (2014). The market for precedent: shifting visions of the role of clinical negligence claims and trials. Medical Law Review, 22(2), 274-290. https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwu007
  • Mulcahy, Linda, Andrews, Cathy (2010). Baird textile holdings v Marks and Spencer plc judgment. In Hunter, Rosemary, McGlynn, Clare, Rackley, Erika (Eds.), Feminist Judgments: From Theory to Practice (pp. 189-204). Hart Publishing.
  • Mulcahy, Linda (2015). Docile suffragettes? Resistance to police photography and the possibility of object–subject transformation. Feminist Legal Studies, 23(1), 79-99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-015-9280-x
  • Mulcahy, Linda, Flessas, Tatiana (2016). Limiting law: art in the street and street in the art. Law, Culture and the Humanities, https://doi.org/10.1177/1743872115625951
  • Mullis, Alastair, Scott, Andrew (2012). Missing the wood (with no excuses): the Defamation Bill 2012.
  • Mullis, Alistair, Scott, Andrew (2011). Lord Lester's Defamation Bill 2010: a distorted view of the public interest? Communications Law, 16(1), 6-19.
  • Mullis, Alastair, Scott, Andrew (2009). Something rotten in the state of English libel law? A rejoinder to the clamour for reform of defamation. Communications Law, 14(6), 173-183.
  • Murkens, Jo, Masterman, Roger (2014). The new constitutional role of the judiciary. (LSE Law Policy Briefing Series 2). London School of Economics and Political Science.
  • Murkens, Jo Eric Khushal (2016). British sovereignty post-Brexit: why the Great ‘Repeal’ Act will actually weaken Parliament.
  • Murkens, Jo Eric Khushal (2016). The Great ‘Repeal’ Act will leave Parliament sidelined and disempowered.
  • Murkens, Jo Eric Khushal (2017). Miller in the Supreme Court: a welcome reminder of the function of a constitution and the rule of law.
  • Murkens, Jo Eric Khushal (2009). The quest for constitutionalism in UK public law discourse. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 29(3), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqp020
  • Murkens, Jo Eric Khushal, Masterman, Roger (2012). Zwischen Vorrangstellung und Ergebenheit: Der Verfassungsstatus des Supreme Court im Vereinigten Königreich. JuristenZeitung, 21(67), 1029-1040.
  • Murkens, Jo Eric Khushal, Trotter, Sarah (2016). Fundamental rights and fundamental fears.
  • Murkens, Jo Eric Khushal (2018). Democracy as the legitimating condition in the UK Constitution. Legal Studies, 38(1), 42 - 58. https://doi.org/10.1017/lst.2017.10
  • Murkens, Jo Eric Khushal (2020). Preservative or transformative? Theorizing the U.K. constitution using comparative method. American Journal of Comparative Law, 68(2), 412 - 440. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcl/avaa015 picture_as_pdf
  • Murkens, Jo Eric Khushal (2021). A written constitution: a case not made. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 41(4), 965-986. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqab016 picture_as_pdf
  • Murray, Andrew D. (2000). Entering into contracts electronically: the real W.W.W. In Edwards, Lilian, Waelde, Charlotte (Eds.), Law and the Internet: a Framework for Electronic Commerce (pp. 17-36). Hart Publishing.
  • Murray, Andrew D. (2015). Time for the media shadow boxing to end, and for the democratic deficit in the expansion of the UK’s surveillance powers to be tackled.
  • Murray, Andrew D. (2009). The reclassification of extreme pornographic images. Modern Law Review, 72(1), 73-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2009.00734.x
  • Newman, Paul (2024). The origin and effect of the nisi prius reports. Journal of Legal History, 45(3), 239 - 271. https://doi.org/10.1080/01440365.2024.2324395 picture_as_pdf
  • Nobles, Richard, Schiff, David (2001). The criminal cases review commission: reporting success? Modern Law Review, 64(2), 280-299. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.00320
  • O'Brien, Patrick (2016). Judges and politics: the parliamentary contributions of the Law Lords 1876-2009. Modern Law Review, 79(5), 786-812. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12215
  • O'Connell, Anna (2008). The United Kingdom's immunity from seizure legislation. (LSE law, society and economy working papers 20-2008). Department of Law, London School of Economics and Political Science.
  • O'Regan, Karla Maureen (2014). Beyond illusion: a juridical genealogy of consent in criminal and medical law [Doctoral thesis]. London School of Economics and Political Science. picture_as_pdf
  • Olivares-Caminal, Rodrigo, Douglas, John, Guynn, Randall, Kornberg, Alan, Paterson, Sarah, Singh, Davinder, Stonefrost, Hilary (2011). Debt restructuring. Oxford University Press.
  • Owusu-Bempah, Abenaa (2020). Understanding the barriers to defendant participation in criminal proceedings in England and Wales. Legal Studies, 40(4), 609 - 629. https://doi.org/10.1017/lst.2020.25 picture_as_pdf
  • Paterson, Sarah (2012). COMI: the elephant in the room. Corporate Rescue and Insolvency, 5(4).
  • Paterson, Sarah (2010). Charter communications: a charter for others? Corporate Rescue and Insolvency, 3(4).
  • Paterson, Sarah (2015). Insolvency law, restructuring law and modern financial markets. (LSE Law Policy Briefing Series 8). London School of Economics and Political Science.
  • Paterson, Sarah (2013). Lodging a proof of debt and submission to jurisdiction. Corporate Rescue and Insolvency, 6(3).
  • Paterson, Sarah (2009). LyondellBasell: the longer arm of chapter 11. Corporate Rescue and Insolvency, 2(4).
  • Paterson, Sarah (2018). Market organisations and institutions in America and England: valuation in corporate bankruptcy. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 93(3), 801 - 830.
  • Paterson, Sarah (2018). Reflections on English law schemes of arrangement in distress and proposals for reform. European Company and Financial Law Review, 15(3), 472-502. https://doi.org/10.1515/ecfr-2018-0015 picture_as_pdf
  • Paterson, Sarah (2019). The rise of covenant-lite lending and implications for the UK’s corporate insolvency law toolbox. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 39(3), 654 - 680. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqz020 picture_as_pdf
  • Peay, Jill (2013). Mental disorder and imprisonment: understanding an intractable problem? In Dockley, Anita, Loader, Ian (Eds.), The Penal Landscape: the Howard League Guide to Criminal Justice in England and Wales (pp. 133-149). Routledge.
  • Peay, Jill (2000). Reform of the Mental Health Act 1983: squandering an opportunity? Journal of Mental Health Law, (3), 5-15.
  • Peay, Jill (2015). Sentencing mentally disordered offenders: conflicting objectives, perilous decisions and cognitive insights. (LSE Law, Society and Economy Working Paper Series). London School of Economics and Political Science. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2549653
  • Peay, Jill (2017). Mental health, mental disabilities and crime. In Liebling, A., Maruna, S., McAra, L. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Criminology . Oxford, UK.
  • Picinali, Federico (2014). Innocence and burdens of proof in English criminal law. Law, Probability and Risk, 13(3-4), 243-257. https://doi.org/10.1093/lpr/mgu007
  • Poole, Thomas (2007). Courts and conditions of uncertainty in 'times of crisis'. (LSE law, society and economy working papers 07-2007). Department of Law, London School of Economics and Political Science.
  • Poole, Thomas (2010). United Kingdom: the royal prerogative. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 8(1), 146-155. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mop038
  • Poole, Thomas (2009). The reformation of English administrative law. Cambridge Law Journal, 68(1), 142-168. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197309000063
  • Poole, Thomas (2007). The reformation of English administrative law. (LSE law, society and economy working papers 12-2007). Department of Law, London School of Economics and Political Science.
  • Poole, Thomas, Shah, Sangeeta (2011). The Law Lords and human rights. Modern Law Review, 74(1), 79-105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2010.00837.x
  • Rahman, Kazi, Roxan, Ian (2010). Mobilx Ltd (in administration) and others v HMRC: is this the end of fraudulent evasion of VAT? British Tax Review, 2010(5), 492-500.
  • Ramsay, Peter (2011). Preparation offences, security interests, political freedom. In Duff, R. A., Farmer, Lindsay, Marshall, S. E., Renzo, Massimo, Tadros, Victor (Eds.), The Structures of the Criminal Law . Oxford University Press.
  • Ramsay, Peter (2016). A democratic theory of imprisonment. In Dzur, Albert, Loader, Ian, Sparks, Richard (Eds.), Democratic Theory and Mass Incarceration (pp. 84 - 113). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190243098.003.0005
  • Redmayne, Mike (2011). Recognising propensity. Criminal Law Review, 2011(3), 177-198.
  • Reece, Helen (2013). Rape myths: is elite opinion right and popular opinion wrong? Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 33(3), 445-473. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqt006
  • Reiner, Robert (2016). Crime, the mystery of the common-sense concept. Polity Press.
  • Reiner, Robert (2017). Social control. In Brisman, A., Carrabine, E., South, N. (Eds.), Criminological Theory and Concepts (pp. 494-497). Routledge.
  • Reiner, Robert (2002). The organization and accountability of the police. In McConville, Mike, Wilson, Geoffrey (Eds.), The Handbook of the Criminal Justice Process (pp. 21-42). Oxford University Press.
  • Reiner, Robert (2016). Conservatives and the Constabulary in Great Britain: cross-dressing conundrums. In Deflem, Mathieu (Ed.), The Politics of Policing: Between Force and Legitimacy (pp. 79-96). Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1521-613620160000021005
  • Roberts, Simon (2009). ‘Listing concentrates the mind’: the English Civil Court as an arena for structured negotiation. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 29(3), 457-479. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqp019
  • Roberts, Stephanie, Malleson, Kate (2002). Streamlining and clarifying the appellate process. Criminal Law Review, April, 272-282.
  • Rossner, Meredith, McCurdy, Martha (2018). Implementing video hearings (party-to-state): a process evaluation. London School of Economics and Political Science. picture_as_pdf
  • Rowan, Solene (2018). Book Review: an introduction to the English law of contract for the civil lawyer by John Cartwright. Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Civil, (01), 932-934.
  • Roxan, Ian (2020). Is VAT also a corporate tax? Untangling tax burdens and benefits for companies. (LSE Law, Society and Economy Working Papers 02/2020). Department of Law, London School of Economics and Political Science. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3555142 picture_as_pdf
  • Ruane, Christopher (2005). Protecting supplier interests through English company law. In Tully, Stephen (Ed.), Research Handbook on Corporate Legal Responsibility (pp. 105-122). Edward Elgar.
  • Sanders, Astrid (2016). The content of contracts of employment: terms incorporated from collective agreements or from other sources. In Freedland, Mark, Bogg, Alan, Cabrelli, David, Collins, Hugh, Countouris, Nicola, Davies, A.C.L., Deakin, Simon, Prassl, Jeremias (Eds.), The Contract of Employment (pp. 449-470). Oxford University Press.
  • Sanders, Astrid, Countouris, Nicola (2016). Variation and suspension of the contract of employment and its terms. In Freedland, Mark, Bogg, Alan, Cabrelli, David, Collins, Hugh, Countouris, Nicola, Davies, A.C.L., Deakin, Simon, Prassl, Jeremias (Eds.), The Contract of Employment (pp. 492-514). Oxford University Press.
  • Sanders, Astrid, Countouris, Nicola (2016). Yapp v Foreign & Commonwealth Office. International Labour Law Reports Online, 35(2016). picture_as_pdf
  • Scott, Andrew (2010). Defamation online: non-culpable republication.
  • Scott, Andrew (2009). Flash flood or slow burn?: celebrities, photographers and protection from harassment. (LSE law, society and economy working papers 13-2009). Department of Law, London School of Economics and Political Science.
  • Scott, Andrew (2010). Prior notification in privacy cases: a reply to Professor Phillipson. Journal of Media Law, 2(1), 49-65.
  • Scott, Andrew (2009). The evolution of competition law and policy in the United Kingdom. (LSE law, society and economy working papers 09-2009). Department of Law, London School of Economics and Political Science.
  • Scott, Andrew (2011). The evolution of competition law and policy in the United Kingdom. In Mehta, Pradeep (Ed.), Evolution of Competition Laws and Their Enforcement: a Political Economy Perspective . Routledge.
  • Scott, Andrew (2011). The perceived breakdown in the legal regime of privacy protection can be addressed by certain amendments to the Human Rights Act.
  • Scott, Andrew, Mullis, Alastair (2011). A moving target for reform: developments in the English common law of libel. Media and Arts Law Review, 16(2), 204-217.
  • Scott, Andrew, Mullis, Alastair (2012). A new style public interest defence in libel law ensures that rights and interests of claimants, defendants and the wider public are properly protected.
  • Sealy, Len, Worthington, Sarah (2010). Sealy's cases and materials in company law. Oxford University Press.
  • Shah, Sangeeta, Poole, Thomas (2009). The impact of the Human Rights Act on the House of Lords. (LSE law, society and economy working papers 08-2009). Department of Law, London School of Economics and Political Science.
  • Simpson, Bob (2009). The Employment Act 2008's amendments to the national minimum wage legislation. Industrial Law Journal, 38(1), 57-64. https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwp001
  • Sinclair, Alexandra Joan (2025). The application of judicial review doctrines to automated administration in the United Kingdom [Doctoral thesis]. London School of Economics and Political Science. https://doi.org/10.21953/lse.00004880 picture_as_pdf
  • Spooner, Joseph, Schwartz, Saul (2025). The local injustice of bankruptcy: geographical variation in access to debt relief in England. Journal of Law and Society, 52(4), 606 - 627. https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.70030 picture_as_pdf
  • Summers, Andrew (2008). All's fair in love and law: an analysis of the common intention constructive trust. Cambridge Student Law Review, 4(2), 149-166.
  • Summers, Andrew (2012). British Westinghouse revisited. Lloyd's Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly, 3, 412-425.
  • Summers, Andrew, Goudkamp, James, Wilmot-Smith, Frederick (2015). Central issues in the law of tort defences. In Summers, Andrew, Goudkamp, James, Wilmot-Smith, Frederick (Eds.), Defences in Tort (pp. 3-24). Hart Publishing.
  • Summers, Andrew, Kramer, Adam (2014). There is no "breach date rule": mitigation, difference in value and date of assessment. Law Quarterly Review, 130, 259 - 281. picture_as_pdf
  • Teubner, Gunther (2000). Foreword: a collision of discourses. In Nobles, Richard, Schiff, David (Eds.), Understanding Miscarriages of Justice: Law, the Media and the Inevitability of Crisis (pp. vi-xi). Oxford University Press.
  • Thambisetty, Sivaramjani (2010). SMEs and patent litigation: policy-based evidence making? European Intellectual Property Review, 32(3), 143-145.
  • Thomas, Chris (2008). R (on the application of Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, Appeal judgment, (2008) UKHL 61, (2009) 1 AC 453, ILDC 1538 (UK 2008), 22nd October 2008, House of Lords [HL]. Oxford Reports on International Law, 1(AC 453).
  • Thomas, Chris (2008). R. and JUSTICE (intervening) (on the application of Corner House Research and Campaign Against Arms Trade) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office, ex parte BAE Systems plc, Appeal judgment, [2008] UKHL 60, [2009] 1 AC 756, [2008] Lloyd's Rep FC 537, [2008] 4 All ER 927, [2008] 3 WLR 568, [2009] Crim LR 46, ILDC 957 (UK 2008), 30th July 2008, House of Lords [HL]. Oxford Reports on International Law, 1(AC 756).
  • Tully, Stephen (2005). Preface. In Tully, Stephen (Ed.), Research Handbook on Corporate Legal Responsibility (pp. xvii-xxii). Edward Elgar.
  • Watterson, Stephen, Mitchell, Charles (2010). Remedies for knowing receipt. In Mitchell, Charles (Ed.), Constructive and Resulting Trusts . Hart Publishing.
  • Webb, Charlie (2020). Illegality. In Day, William, Worthington, Sarah (Eds.), Challenging Private Law: Lord Sumption on the Supreme Court (pp. 237 - 256). Hart Publishing. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509934904.ch-013
  • Webb, Charlie (2009). What is unjust enrichment? Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 29(2), 215-243. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqp008
  • Webb, Charlie (2011). The double lives of property. Jurisprudence, 2(1), 205-216. https://doi.org/10.5235/204033211796290308
  • Webb, Charlie, Akkouh, Tim (2013). Trusts law. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Webb, Charlie (2016). The myth of the remedial constructive trust. Current Legal Problems, 69(1), 353 - 376. https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/cuw013
  • Webber, Grégoire C. N. (2010). Book review: constitutional review under the UK Human Rights Act by Aileen Kavanagh. Modern Law Review, 73(5), 887-893. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2010.00823_1.x
  • Webber, Grégoire (2014). Book review: eulogy for the constitution that was. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 12(2), 468-486. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mou032 picture_as_pdf
  • Wei Liang Wang, Daniel (2013). Can litigation promote fairness in healthcare? The judicial review of rationing decisions in Brazil and England [Doctoral thesis]. London School of Economics and Political Science. picture_as_pdf
  • Worthington, Sarah (2006). Equity. Oxford University Press.
  • Worthington, Sarah (2006). Proprietary remedies and insolvency policy: the need for a new approach. In Lowry, John, Mistelis, Loukas (Eds.), Commercial Law: Perspectives and Practice (pp. 191-205). LexisNexis Butterworths.
  • Zander, Michael (2007). Cases and materials on the English legal system. Cambridge University Press.
  • Zander, Michael (2004). The Green Paper and beyond. International Journal of the Legal Profession, 11(1), 123-130. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595042000317514
  • Zander, Michael (2013). The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984. Sweet & Maxwell.
  • Zander, Michael (2003). Preparing the criminal case for trial. Judicial Studies Institute Journal, 3(1), 39-70.
  • Zander, Michael (2000). What on earth is Lord Justice Auld supposed to do? Criminal Law Review, 2000, 419-435.
  • Zander, Michael (2003). Where are we heading with the funding of civil litigation? Civil Justice Quarterly, 22, 23-40.
  • Zander, Michael (2002). Where are we now on conditional fees? – or why this emperor is wearing few, if any, clothes. Modern Law Review, 65(6), 919-930. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.00416
  • Zander, Michael (2002). Will the revolution in the funding of civil litigation in England eventually lead to contingency fees? Depaul Law Review, 2002, 259-297.
  • Zander, Michael (2004). The law-making process. Cambridge University Press.
  • Zellick, Graham, Blom-Cooper, Louis, Bradley, A. W., Cotterrell, Robin, Griffith, J. A. G., Jowell, Jeffrey, Marshall, Geoffrey, Williams, D. G. T., Yeats, I. M. (1984). Letter to the editor: removing a basic right of appeal.
  • van Gerven, Walter (2008). Politics, ethics & the law, legal practice & scholarship. (LSE law, society and economy working papers 19-2008). Department of Law, London School of Economics and Political Science.
    • Lifecourse, Ageing & Population Health
  • Grundy, Emily, Murphy, Michael J. (2006). Kin availability, contact and support exchanges between adult children and their parents in Great Britain. In Ebtehaj, Fatemeh, Lindley, Bridget, Richards, Martin (Eds.), Kinship Matters (pp. 195-215). Hart Publishing.
    • Management
  • Backhouse, James (1995). Getting the adjustment right: controls and computer security. Journal of Financial Crime, 3(1), 56-59. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb025670
  • Backhouse, James (1996). The security of smart cards: some obstacles still to be cleared? Journal of Financial Crime, 3(4), 353-359. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb025734
  • Edwardes, Cheryl A., Hosein, Ian, Whitley, Edgar A. (2007). Balance, scrutiny and identity cards in the UK. Criminal Justice Matters, 68(1), 29-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/09627250708553282
  • Naidu, Suresh, Yuchtman, Noam (2013). Coercive contract enforcement: law and the labor market in nineteenth century industrial Britain. American Economic Review, 103(1), 107-144. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.103.1.107 picture_as_pdf
  • Sommer, Peter (2009). Meetings between experts: a route to simpler, fairer trials? Digital Investigation, 5(3-4), 146-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diin.2008.11.002
    • Media and Communications
  • Audette, Trish (2011). Phone hacking: is it time to get tough on the press? (guest blog on POLIS debate).
  • Barnett, Steven, Moore, Martin, Tambini, Damian (2017). Media plurality, the Fox-Sky bid, and the case for referral to Ofcom. (LSE Media Policy Project Series Media Policy Brief 18). London School of Economics and Political Science.
  • Beckett, Charlie (26 November 2012) Arguments for statutory underpinning of regulation. Polis Blog. picture_as_pdf
  • Beckett, Charlie (26 November 2012) Arguments in favour of self regulation. Polis Blog. picture_as_pdf
  • Beckett, Charlie (2007). Barry George: Trial by media?
  • Beckett, Charlie (2008). Bash the Bish: Sharia law and Rowan Williams.
  • Beckett, Charlie (2008). Behavioural advertising: solution or slippery slope?
  • Beckett, Charlie (2012). Blair: lessons From Leveson (part one).
  • Beckett, Charlie (2012). Blair: lessons from Leveson – ‘It’s a waste of time” (part two).
  • Beckett, Charlie (2008). Contempt: time to lose the law.
  • Beckett, Charlie (2007). Dave backs FoI: where's Gordon?
  • Beckett, Charlie (2009). Digital mob rules OK? Baby Peter and the Internet.
  • Beckett, Charlie (2012). Extra! Extra! Read all about it! – what is this blog for?
  • Beckett, Charlie (2008). Free the Ashford one!: Damian Green and the police state.
  • Beckett, Charlie (2007). Goldsmith gets it right-ish.
  • Beckett, Charlie (28 November 2012) International perspectives on Leveson – what the non-UK media says. Polis Blog. picture_as_pdf
  • Beckett, Charlie (2012). International regulatory comparisons.
  • Beckett, Charlie (2009). Internet porn laws: they won't work and they herald further controls.
  • Beckett, Charlie (2011). James and Rupert Murdoch: humbled but not defeated (so far).
  • Beckett, Charlie (2008). Literacy not the law: bondage and the bloggers.
  • Beckett, Charlie (2008). McCanns and the Internet.
  • Beckett, Charlie (2008). McCanns victory over Express: triumph for truth?
  • Beckett, Charlie (2012). Murdoch and the Media Committee: a political battle.
  • Beckett, Charlie (27 November 2012) Other background articles – law, economics etc. Polis Blog. picture_as_pdf
  • Beckett, Charlie (2011). Phonehacking and press reforms: beware dangerous dogs.
  • Beckett, Charlie (2012). Policy briefs from the LSE Media Policy Project.
  • Beckett, Charlie (2012). Post publication reaction.
  • Beckett, Charlie (2012). Revenge of the Evil Empire and why I’m backing Darth Vader: my case against statutory newspaper regulation #Leveson.
  • Beckett, Charlie (27 November 2012) Some deeper background articles on regulation. Polis Blog. picture_as_pdf
  • Beckett, Charlie (2010). Time to trust jurors and journalists on contempt?
  • Beckett, Charlie (2008). Trial by media?
  • Beckett, Charlie (2007). UK MPs vote against free speech.
  • Beckett, Charlie (2007). What's a website m'lud?
  • Beckett, Charlie (2012). Why Leveson matters (and it’s not really the report).
  • Beckett, Charlie (2009). Why shouldn't the mail steal your photos?
  • Beckett, Charlie (2011). A massive moment for media and politics in Britain.
  • Beckett, Charlie (26 November 2012) The politics of Leveson. Polis Blog. picture_as_pdf
  • Beckett, Charlie (2008). The real migrant crime myth.
  • Cammaerts, Bart, Meng, Bingchun (2011). Creative destruction and copyright protection: regulatory responses to file-sharing. (LSE Media Policy Project Series Media Policy Brief 1). Department of Media and Communications, London School of Economics and Political Science.
  • Cammaerts, Bart (2017). Communication freedoms versus communication rights: discursive and normative struggles within civil society and beyond. In Tumber, Howard, Waisbord, Silvio (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Media and Human Rights . Routledge.
  • Cammaerts, Bart (2017). Press freedom and communication rights: normative struggles within civil society and beyond. In Waisbord, Silvio, Tumber, Howard (Eds.), Routledge Companion to Media and Human Rights (pp. 50-59). Routledge.
  • Goodman, Emma, Labo, Sharif, Tambini, Damian, Moore, Martin (2017). The new political campaigning. (LSE Media Policy Project Series Media Policy Brief 19). London School of Economics and Political Science.
  • Hänska, Max (2011). News of the World executives – how did they ‘not know?’ Guest blog.
  • Livingstone, Sonia (8 September 2021) Why is media literacy prominent in the UK’s draft Online Safety Bill 2021? Parenting for a Digital Future. picture_as_pdf
  • Livingstone, Sonia, Tambini, Damian, Belakova, Nikola, Goodman, Emma (2018). Protection of children online: does current regulation deliver? (LSE Media Policy Project Series Media Policy Brief 21). London School of Economics and Political Science, Department of Media and Communications. picture_as_pdf
  • Livingstone, Sonia, Lunt, Peter, Miller, Laura (2007). Citizens, consumers and the citizen-consumer: articulating the interests at stake in media and communications regulation. Discourse and Communication, 1(1), 85-111. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481307071985
  • Lunt, Peter, Livingstone, Sonia (2008). Public understanding of regimes of risk regulation: final report. Public Understanding of Regimes of Risk and Regulation Project.
  • Lunt, Peter, Livingstone, Sonia, Malik, Sarita (2008). Public understanding of regimes of risk regulation: a report on focus group discussions with citizens and consumers. Public Understanding of Regimes of Risk and Regulation Project.
  • Mansell, Robin, Steinmueller, W. Edward (2010). British Telecommunications plc (“BT”) and TalkTalk Telecom Group Limited v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills (“BIS”): in the matter of an intended claim. LSE Enterprise.
  • Mansell, Robin, Steinmueller, W. Edward (2011-07-13 - 2011-07-17) Copyright infringement online: the case of the Digital Economy Act judicial review in the United Kingdom [Paper]. International Association for Media and Communication Research Conference, Istanbul, Turkey, TUR.
  • Mansell, Robin, Steinmueller, W. Edward (2011). In the High Court of Justice, Administrative Court between The Queen on the application of (1) British Telecommunications plc (2) TalkTalk Telecom Group plc and The Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, claim no. CO/7354/2010: prepared for BT. LSE Enterprise.
  • Mansell, Robin, Steinmueller, W. Edward (2013). Copyright infringement online: the case of the Digital Economy Act judicial review in the United Kingdom. New Media & Society, 15(8), 1312-1328. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812470429
    • Methodology
  • Bauer, Martin W., Howard, Susan, Hagenhoff, Vera, Gasperoni, Giancarlo, Rusanen, Maria (2006). The BSE and CJD crisis in the press. In Dora, Carlos (Ed.), Health, Hazard and Public Debate: Lessons for Risk Communication From the Bse/Cjd Saga (pp. 125-164 [chapter 6]). World Health Organization.
  • Bradford, Ben, Milani, J., Jackson, Jonathan (2017). Identity, legitimacy and ‘making sense’ of police use of force. Policing: An International Journal, 40(3), 614-627. https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-06-2016-0085
  • Bradford, Ben, Yesberg, Julia, Jackson, Jonathan, Dawson, Paul (2020). Live facial recognition: trust and legitimacy as predictors of public support for police use of new technology. British Journal of Criminology, picture_as_pdf
  • Jackson, Jonathan (2015). On the dual motivational force of legitimate authority. (LSE Law, Society and Economy Working Paper Series). London School of Economics and Political Science. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2564592
  • Jackson, Jonathan, Bradford, Ben, Hough, Mike, Myhill, Andy, Quinton, Paul, Tyler, Tom R. (2012). Why do people comply with the law?: legitimacy and the influence of legal institutions. British Journal of Criminology, 52(6), 1051-1071. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azs032
  • Jackson, Jonathan, Hohl, Katrin, Bradford, Ben (26 February 2025) How police can regain the trust of sexual violence victims. British Politics and Policy at LSE. picture_as_pdf
  • Jackson, Jonathan, Tyler, Tom R., Bradford, Ben, Taylor, Dominic, Shiner, Mike (2010). Legitimacy and procedural justice in prisons. Prison Service Journal, 191, 4-10.
  • Kyprianides, Arabella, Creutzfeldt, Naomi, Bradford, Ben, Jackson, Jonathan (24 April 2024) How the shift to online legal processes leaves many behind. LSE Inequalities. picture_as_pdf
  • Roberts, Julian, Hough, Mike, Jackson, Jonathan, Gerber, Monica M. (2012). Public opinion towards the lay magistracy and the sentencing council guidelines: the effects of information on attitudes. British Journal of Criminology, 52(6), 1072-1091. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azs024
    • Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method
  • Burri, Susanne (2020). Morally permissible risk imposition and liability to defensive harm. Law and Philosophy, 39(4), 381-408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10982-019-09368-0 picture_as_pdf
  • Lever, Annabelle (2007). Is judicial review undemocratic? Public Law, (Summer), 280-298.
    • Psychological and Behavioural Science
  • Bauer, Martin W., Howard, Susan, Hagenhoff, Vera, Gasperoni, Giancarlo, Rusanen, Maria (2006). The BSE and CJD crisis in the press. In Dora, Carlos (Ed.), Health, Hazard and Public Debate: Lessons for Risk Communication From the Bse/Cjd Saga (pp. 125-164 [chapter 6]). World Health Organization.
    • Public Policy Group
  • Dunleavy, Patrick (29 April 2015) Why the 2015 UK election spells the bitter end for the biggest ‘law’ in political science. USApp-American Politics and Policy Blog. picture_as_pdf
  • Dunleavy, Patrick, Bastow, Simon, Tinkler, Jane, Goldchluck, Sofia, Towers, Ed (2010). Joining up citizen redress in UK central government. In Adler, Michael (Ed.), Administrative Justice in Context (pp. 421-456). Hart Publishing.
  • Gilson, Christopher (2011). Punitive reactions by ministers or the judiciary seek to deter future riots. But if such measures undermine the perceived fairness and legitimacy of the criminal justice system and worsen police-community relations, they could prove counter-productive.
    • School of Public Policy
  • Gearty, Conor (2016). Potential removal of EU nationals from the UK is not incompatible with the Human Rights Act.
  • Grogan, Joelle (2018). EU law is not a thing we simply leave behind on Brexit day. picture_as_pdf
  • Karemba, Byron (2018). Brexit, the separation of powers and the role of the supreme court. picture_as_pdf
  • Townsend, Mike (2018). Will the Brexit cloud have a silver lining for conservationists? picture_as_pdf
    • Social Policy
  • Delsol, Rebekah, Shiner, Michael (Eds.) (2015). Stop and search: the anatomy of a police power. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137336101
  • Bowling, B., Phillips, Coretta (2007). Ethnicities, racism, crime, and criminal justice. In Maguire, Mike, Morgan, Rod, Reiner, Robert (Eds.), Handbook of Criminology . Oxford University Press.
  • Bowling, Benjamin, Phillips, Coretta (2007). Disproportionate and discriminatory: reviewing the evidence on police stop and search. Modern Law Review, 70(6), 236-961. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2007.00671.x
  • Dean, Hartley (2004). Losing appeal? The changing face of redress. Benefits: the Journal of Poverty and Social Justice, 12(1), 4-7.
  • Downes, David, Newburn, Tim (2022). The official history of criminal justice in England and Wales Volume IV: the politics of law and order. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003330981
  • Grundy, Emily, Murphy, Michael J. (2006). Kin availability, contact and support exchanges between adult children and their parents in Great Britain. In Ebtehaj, Fatemeh, Lindley, Bridget, Richards, Martin (Eds.), Kinship Matters (pp. 195-215). Hart Publishing.
  • Guiney, Thomas (2018). Excavating the archive: reflections on a historical criminology of government, penal policy and criminal justice change. Criminology and Criminal Justice, https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895818810333 picture_as_pdf
  • Hebenton, William, Pease, Ken, Phillips, Coretta (2003). Sentencing offenders against non-human animals in England and Wales. Crime and Criminal Justice International, 1(1), 247-285.
  • Jones, Trevor, Newburn, Tim (1997). Policing after the act: police governance after the Police and Magistrates’ Courts Act 1994. Policy Studies Institute.
  • Lacey, Nicola (2014). Gouvernement-manageur et citoyens-consommateurs. Le cas du Criminal Justice Act 1991. Tracés, 2(27), 183-210.
  • Lacey, Nicola (2014). Justice redefined – or justice diluted? Family Law, 2014(44), 593-595.
  • Miers, David, Maguire, Mike, Goldie, Shelag, Sharpe, Karen, Hale, Chris, Netten, Ann, Uglow, Steve, Doolin, Katherine, Hallam, Angela & Enterkin, Jill et al (2001). An exploratory evaluation of restorative justice schemes. (Crime Reduction Research Series 9). Home Office.
  • Newburn, Tim (2024). The official history of criminal justice in England and Wales Volume V: policing post-war Britain: plus ça change. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003529965
  • Newburn, Tim, Crawford, Adam, Earle, Rod, Goldie, Shelag, Hale, Chris, Hallam, Angela, Masters, Guy, Netten, Ann, Saunders, Robin & Sharpe, Karen et al (2002). The introduction of referral orders into the youth justice system: final report. (Home Office Research Study 242). Home Office.
  • Newburn, Tim, Crawford, Adam, Earle, Rod, Goldie, Shelag, Hale, Chris, Masters, Guy, Netten, Ann, Saunders, Robin, Sharpe, Karen, Uglow, Steve (2001). The introduction of referral orders into the youth justice system: first interim report. (RDS Occasional Paper No 70). Home Office.
  • Newburn, Tim, Crawford, Adam, Earle, Rod, Goldie, Shelag, Hale, Chris, Masters, Guy, Netten, Ann, Saunders, Robin, Sharpe, Karen, Uglow, Steve (2001). The introduction of referral orders into the youth justice system: second interim report. (RDS Occasional Paper No 73). Home Office.
  • Newburn, Tim, Jones, Trevor (2002). Consultation by crime and disorder partnerships. (Police Research Series 148). Home Office.
  • Phillips, Coretta, Browning, David (1997). Observational studies in police custody areas: some methodological and ethical issues considered. Policing and Society, 7(3), 191-205. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.1997.9964773
  • Phillips, Coretta, Sampson, Alice (1998). Preventing repeated racial victimisation: an action research project. British Journal of Criminology, 38(1), 124-144.
  • Prasad, Pupul Dutta (2022). The prospect of restorative juvenile justice in India: insights from youth justice in England and Wales [Doctoral thesis]. London School of Economics and Political Science. https://doi.org/10.21953/lse.00004478
  • Ravenscroft, Penelope Lynne (2011). Punish and be damned: judicial discretion in juvenile courts: the welfare and punishment dichotomy in England/Wales and Scotland [Doctoral thesis]. London School of Economics and Political Science. picture_as_pdf
  • Shiner, Michael, Carre, Zoe, Delsol, Rebekah, Eastwood, Niamh (2018). The colour of injustice: 'race', drugs and law enforcement in England and Wales. StopWatch. picture_as_pdf
    • Sociology
  • Adereth, Maya (2024). Legal boundaries, organizational fields, and trade union politics: the development of railway unions in the US and the UK. Social Science History, 48(3), 433 - 457. https://doi.org/10.1017/ssh.2024.23 picture_as_pdf
  • Matczak, Anna (2014). Researching court interpreting.
  • Moon, Claire (2008). Amnesty. In Cane, Peter, Conaghan, Joanne (Eds.), New Oxford Companion to Law . Oxford University Press.
    • Systemic Risk Centre
  • Thimann, Christian (2016). Insurance and systemic risk: no easy conclusions. VoxEU,
    • Urban and Spatial Programme
  • Aron, Janine, Muellbauer, John (2011). Modelling and forecasting with county court data: regional mortgage possession claims and orders in England and Wales. (SERC Discussion Papers SERCDP0070). Spatial Economics Research Centre (SERC), London School of Economics and Political Sciences.
  • Cheshire, Paul (2016). Greenbelt madness: or how to get it back to front.
  • Leunig, Tim (2011). Conditional discharges for looters that come forward would be a first step towards community reconciliation in the wake of the recent riots.
  • Overman, Henry G. (2012). (More) planning rule reform.
  • Overman, Henry G. (2012). Relaxing planning laws.
    • What Works Centre
  • Overman, Henry G. (2012). (More) planning rule reform.
  • Overman, Henry G. (2012). Relaxing planning laws.