Items where Subject is "BD Speculative Philosophy"

Library of Congress subjects (102130) B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion (6157) BD Speculative Philosophy (62)
Number of items at this level: 62.
Article
  • Birch, Jonathan (2017). Animal sentience and the precautionary principle. Animal Sentience, 2(16).
  • Boström, Magnus, Klintman, Mikael (2017). Can we rely on ‘climate-friendly’ consumption? Journal of Consumer Culture, https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540517717782
  • Bovens, Luc, Hartmann, Stephan (2007). Special issue on Bayesian epistemology edited by L. Bovens and S. Hartmann. Synthese, 156(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-006-9130-0
  • Bradley, Seamus, Steele, Katie Siobhan (2014). Should subjective probabilities be sharp? Episteme, 11(03), 277-289. https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2014.8
  • Dietrich, Franz, List, Christian (2017). What matters and how it matters: a choice-theoretic representation of moral theories. Philosophical Review, 126(4), 421-479. https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-4173412
  • Dolan, Paul, Jones, Martin (2004). Explaining attitudes towards ambiguity: an experimental test of the comparative ignorance hypothesis. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 51(3), 281-301. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0036-9292.2004.00307.x
  • Flikschuh, Katrin (2016). The arc of personhood: Menkiti and Kant on becoming and being a person. Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 2(3), 437-455. https://doi.org/10.1017/apa.2016.26
  • Frigg, Roman, Hoefer, Carl (2007). Probability in GRW Theory. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 38(2), 371-389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2006.12.002
  • Halliday, Fred (1999). The significance of the twentieth century. Radical Philosophy, (98), 2-5.
  • Howson, Colin (2017). Putting on the Garber style? Better not. Philosophy of Science, 84(4), 659-676. https://doi.org/10.1086/693466
  • Howson, Colin (2016). Repelling a Prussian charge with a solution to a paradox of Dubins. Synthese, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1205-y
  • Kallinikos, Jannis (2009). On the computational rendition of reality: artefacts and human agency. Organization, 16(2), 183-202. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508408100474
  • Le Grand, Julian (1984). Equity as an economic objective. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 1(1), 39-51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5930.1984.tb00185.x
  • Rabinowicz, Wlodek (2000). Preference stability and substitution of indifferents: a rejoinder to Seidenfeld. Theory and Decision, 48(4), 311-318. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005296119507
  • Reiss, Julian (2009). Causation in the social sciences: evidence,inference, and purpose. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 39(1), 20-40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393108328150
  • Reiss, Julian (2009). Editorial and interview with Kevin Korb. The Reasoner, 3(2), 1-3.
  • Roberts, Bryan W. (2017). Unreal observables. Philosophy of Science, 84(5), 1265-1274. https://doi.org/10.1086/694298
  • Ross, Lewis D. (2020). How intellectual communities progress. Episteme, https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2020.2 picture_as_pdf
  • Salis, Fiora (2017). Essay review: Models and exploratory models. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 63, 58-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2017.04.004
  • Salis, Fiora (2016). The nature of model-world comparisons. The Monist, 99(3), 243-259. https://doi.org/10.1093/monist/onw003
  • Salis, Fiora (2016). The problem of satisfaction conditions and the dispensability of i-desire. Erkenntnis, 81(1), 105-118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-015-9731-4
  • Scott, Michael W. (2017). Getting more real with wonder: an afterword. Journal of Religious and Political Practice, 3(3), 212-229. https://doi.org/10.1080/20566093.2017.1351174
  • Spiekermann, Kai (2013). Book review: Framing democracy: a behavioral approach to democratic theory, Jamie Terence Kelly. Ethics, 123(3), 568-572. https://doi.org/10.1086/670201
  • Steele, Katie, Werndl, Charlotte (2018). Model-selection theory: the need for a more nuanced picture of use-novelty and double-counting. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 69(2), 351-375. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axw024
  • Stock, Paul (2017). Towards a language of 'Europe': history, rhetoric, community. European Legacy, 22(6), 647-666. https://doi.org/10.1080/10848770.2017.1326672
  • Virdi, Arhat (2009). The slingshot argument, Godel's hesitation and Tarskian semantics. Prolegomena, 8(2), 233-241.
  • Wüthrich, Nicolas (2017). Book review: review of Peter Spiegler's Behind the model: a constructive critique of economic modelling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2015. 201pp. Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics, 10(1), 124-132. https://doi.org/10.23941/ejpe.v10i1.256
  • Ypi, Lea (2013). The owl of Minerva only flies at dusk, but to where? A reply to critics. Ethics and Global Politics, 6(2), 117-134. https://doi.org/10.3402/egp.v6i2.21628
  • Zeiderman, Austin (2014). Commentary on: 'Pandemic prophecy, or how to have faith in reason' by Carlo Caduff. Current Anthropology, 55(3), 312-315. https://doi.org/10.1086/676124
    • Audio/visual resource
  • Falkiner, Daniel (2014). Fallen. LSE Research Festival 2014. London, London, United Kingdom, GBR.
  • Falkiner, Daniel (2014). Nemesis. LSE Research Festival 2014. London, London, United Kingdom, GBR.
    • Book
  • Bovens, Luc, Hartmann, Stephan (2004). Bayesian epistemology. Oxford University Press.
  • Cartwright, Nancy (2007). Hunting causes and using them: approaches in philosophy and economics. Cambridge University Press.
  • Gray, John (2002). Straw dogs: thoughts on humans and other animals. Granta Books.
  • Howson, Colin (2000). Hume's problem: induction and the justification of belief. Oxford University Press.
  • Klintman, Mikael (2016). Human sciences and human interests: integrating the social, economic, and evolutionary sciences. Routledge.
  • Mahtani, Anna (2024). The objects of credence. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198847892.001.0001
    • Chapter
  • Bright, L. K. (2023). Du Bois on the centralized organization of science. In Griffioen, Amber L., Backmann, Marius (Eds.), Pluralizing Philosophy’s Past: New Reflections in the History of Philosophy (pp. 31 - 43). Springer International (Firm). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13405-0_3
  • Cartwright, Nancy (2000). Against the completability of science. In Wolff, Jonathan, Stone, Martin (Eds.), The Proper Ambition of Science (pp. 209-222). Routledge.
  • Cartwright, Nancy (2001). Modularity: it can - and generally does, fail. In Costantini, Domenico, Galavotti, Maria Carla, Suppes, Patrick (Eds.), Stochastic Causality (pp. 65-84). CSLI Publications (Firm).
  • Cartwright, Nancy (2007). What makes a capacity a disposition? In Kistler, Max, Gnassounou, Bruno (Eds.), Dispositions and Causal Powers (pp. 195 - 206). Ashgate Dartmouth. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315577616-12
  • Dietrich, Franz, Spiekermann, Kai (2020). Social epistemology. In Knauff, M., Spohn, W. (Eds.), The Handbook of Rationality . MIT Press. picture_as_pdf
  • Glendinning, Simon (2003). Continental philosophy. In Shand, John (Ed.), Fundamentals of Philosophy (pp. 408-442). Taylor & Francis.
  • Hartmann, Stephan, Fahrbach, L. (2005). Der Bayesianismus und die herausforderung durch den partikularismus. In Gesang, Bernward (Ed.), Deskriptive Oder Normative Wissenschaftstheorie? (pp. 177-204). Ontos Verlag.
  • Klintman, Mikael (2017). Retail sector facing the challenge of sustainable consumption. In Keller, Margit, Halkier, Bente, Terhi-Anna, Wilska, Truninger, Monica (Eds.), Routledge Handbook on Consumption (pp. 363-371). Routledge.
  • Madhok, Sumi, Evans, Mary (2014). Epistemology and marginality. In Evans, Mary, Hemmings, Clare, Henry, Marsha, Johnstone, Hazel, Madhok, Sumi, Plomien, Ania, Wearing, Sadie (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Feminist Theory (pp. 1-8). Sage Publications Ltd..
  • Rodgers, Dennis (2008). Youth gangs as ontological assets. In Moser, Caroline O. N., Dani, Anis A. (Eds.), Assets, Livelihoods, and Social Policy (pp. 237-254). World Bank.
  • Salis, Fiora, Frigg, Roman (2016). Capturing the scientific imagination. In Godfrey-Smith, Peter, Levy, Arnon (Eds.), The Scientific Imagination . Oxford University Press. picture_as_pdf
  • Voorhoeve, Alex, Binmore, Ken (2005). Defending transitivity against Zeno's paradox. In Ronnow-Rasmussen, Toni, Zimmerman, Michael J (Eds.), Recent Work on Intrinsic Value (pp. 265-272). Springer Berlin / Heidelberg.
  • Wüthrich, Nicolas (2016). Conceptualizing uncertainty: an assessment of the uncertainty framework of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In Recent Developments in the Philosophy of Science: EPSA15 Düsseldorf . Springer Berlin / Heidelberg. picture_as_pdf
    • Conference or Workshop Item
  • Campbell, Ian (2018-02-19 - 2018-02-24) What makes a good life? [Poster]. LSE Research Festival 2018, London School of Economics, London, United Kingdom, GBR. picture_as_pdf
    • Thesis
  • Blunt, Christopher (2015). Hierarchies of evidence in evidence-based medicine [Doctoral thesis]. London School of Economics and Political Science.
  • Faria, Goreti (2016). Time, hope, and independence: an argument for more structure in decision theory [Doctoral thesis]. London School of Economics and Political Science. https://doi.org/10.21953/lse.h7ue6u9i99cp
  • Tohidi, Somayeh (2025). Demographic statistical evidence with a humane face [Doctoral thesis]. London School of Economics and Political Science. https://doi.org/10.21953/lse.00004856
    • Online resource
  • Rowe, Tom (2016). Providing aid and foreseeing harm.
  • Sharman, Amelia (2013). Book review: The fanaticism of the apocalypse.
  • Smeltzer, Joshua (2017). Book review: Marx, capital and the madness of economic reason by David Harvey.
    • Working paper
  • Bradley, Richard (2007). Reaching a consensus. (LSE Choice Group working paper series vol. 3, no. 3). The Centre for Philosophy of Natural and Social Science (CPNSS).
  • List, Christian, Rabinowicz, Wlodek (2012). Two intuitions about free will: alternative possibilities and endorsement. London School of Economics and Political Science.
  • Schulte, Jonathan, Aston, Thomas (2025). Towards principled adequacy for purpose in choosing evaluation methods. London School of Economics and Political Science. https://doi.org/10.21953/lse.go7zknl0dmdw picture_as_pdf
    • Blog post
  • Lacey, Nicola (27 March 2024) Horizon, Windrush and Grenfell tell us clearly - criminal justice requires epistemic justice. LSE Inequalities. picture_as_pdf
  • McDonagh, Luke (11 April 2014) Book review: Walter Benjamin: a critical life by Howard Eiland and Michael W. Jennings. LSE Review of Books. picture_as_pdf