Items where Subject is "BC Logic"

Library of Congress subjects (102130) B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion (6157) BC Logic (177)
Number of items at this level: 177.
A
  • Addis, Mark, Eckert, Claudia (2024). Explanatory frameworks in complex change and resilience system modelling. Logic Journal of IGPL, https://doi.org/10.1093/jigpal/jzae087 picture_as_pdf
  • Alexander, J McKenzie, Balasubramanian, Rajalakshmi, Martin, Jeremy, Monahan, Kimberly, Pollatsek, Harriet, Sen, Ashna (2000). Ruling out (160, 54, 18) difference sets in some nonabelian groups. Journal of Combinatorial Designs, 8(4), 221-231. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6610(2000)8:4<221::AID-JCD1>3.0.CO;2-6
  • Alexander, J. McKenzie (2011). Expectations and choiceworthiness. Mind, 120(479), 803-817. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzr049
  • Alonso, Ricardo, Matouschek, Niko (2007). Relational delegation. RAND Journal of Economics, 38(4), 1070-1089. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0741-6261.2007.00126.x
  • Arrhenius, Gustaf, Rabinowicz, Wlodek (2005). Millian superiorities. Utilitas, 17(2), 127-146. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820805001494
  • Baigent, Nicholas (2010). Topological theories of social choice. In Arrow, Kenneth, Sen, A. K., Suzumura, Kotaro (Eds.), Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare (pp. 301-334). Elsevier (Firm). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7218(10)00018-3
  • Liberman, Andrés Occhipinti, Achen, Andreas, Rendsvig, Rasmus K. (2020). Dynamic term-modal logics for first-order epistemic planning. Artificial Intelligence, 286, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2020.103305 picture_as_pdf
  • Makinson, David C. (2005). Friendliness for logicians. In Artemov, S., Barringer, H., d'Avila Garcez, A. S., Lamb, L. C., Woods, J. (Eds.), We Will Show Them! Essays in Honour of Dov Gabbay (pp. 259-292). College Publications.
  • Rabinowicz, Wlodek, Arrhenius, Gustaf (2004). Millian superiorities. In Rabinowicz, Wlodek, Rønnow-Rasmussen, Toni (Eds.), Patterns of Value: Essays on Formal Axiology and Value Analysis (pp. 1-20). Lund Universitetstrycheriet.
  • Rabinowicz, Wlodek, Arrhenius, Gustaf (2003). On millian discontinuities. In Rabinowicz, Wlodek, Rønnow-Rasmussen, Toni (Eds.), Patterns of Value: Essays on Formal Axiology and Value Analysis (pp. 1-8). Lund Universitetstrycheriet.
  • B
  • Birch, Jonathan (2017). The inclusive fitness controversy: finding a way forward. Royal Society Open Science, 4(170335), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.170335
  • Bovens, Luc (2009). Interview. In Hájek, Alan, Hendricks, Vincent F. (Eds.), Probability and Statistics: 5 Questions . Automatic Press.
  • Bovens, Luc (2010). Judy Benjamin is a Sleeping Beauty. Analysis, 70(1), p. 23. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anp127
  • Bovens, Luc (2006). The doctrinal paradox and the mixed-motivation problem. Analysis, 66(289), 35-38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8284.2006.00586.x
  • Bovens, Luc, Beisbart, C (2007). Factions in Rousseau's Du Contrat Social and Federal Representation. Analysis, 67(293), 12-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8284.2007.00643.x
  • Bovens, Luc, Hartmann, Stephan (2000). Coherence, belief expansion and Bayesian networks. In Baral, Chitta, Truszczynski, Mirek (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning: Nmr'2000 . International Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning.
  • Bovens, Luc, Rabinowicz, Wlodek (2004). Complex collective decisions: an epistemic perspective. Associations: Journal for Social and Legal Theory, 7,
  • Bovens, Luc, Rabinowicz, Wlodek (2004). Democracy and argument: tracking truth in complex social decisions. In van Aaken, Anne, List, Christian, Luetge, Christophe (Eds.), Deliberation and Decision: Economics, Constitutional Theory, and Deliberative Democracy (pp. 143-157). Ashgate Dartmouth.
  • Bovens, Luc, Rabinowicz, Wlodek (2004). Voting procedures for complex collective decisions: an epistemic perspective. Ratio Juris, 17(2), 241-258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9337.2004.00266.x
  • Bradley, Richard (2006). Adams conditionals and non-monotonic probabilities. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 15(1-2), 65-81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10849-005-9007-5
  • Bradley, Richard (2011). Conditionals and supposition-based reasoning. Topoi, 30(1), 39-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-010-9081-4
  • Bradley, Richard (2007). Impartiality in 'Weighing Lives'. Philosophical Books, 48(4), 292-302. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0149.2007.00450_2.x
  • Bradley, Richard (1999). More triviality. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 28(2), 129-139.
  • Bradley, Richard (1998). A representation theorem for a decision theory with conditionals. Synthese, 116(2), 187-229.
  • Bradley, Richard, Dietrich, Franz, List, Christian (2006). Aggregating causal judgements. Department of Government, London School of Economics and Political Science.
  • Bradley, Seamus, Steele, Katie (2016). Can free evidence be bad? Value of informationfor the imprecise probabilist. Philosophy of Science, 83(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1086/684184
  • Bright, Liam Kofi (2017). Logical empiricists on race. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 65, 9-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2017.07.001
  • Brown, Campbell (2018). Maximalism and the structure of acts. Noûs, 52(4), 752 - 771. https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12181
  • Brown, Campbell (2016). The rightest theory of degrees of rightness. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 19(1), 21-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-016-9689-6
  • Brown, William, Gyenis, Zalán, Rédei, Miklós (2018). The modal logic of Bayesian belief revision. Journal of Philosophical Logic, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-018-9495-9 picture_as_pdf
  • Burri, Susanne (2020). Morally permissible risk imposition and liability to defensive harm. Law and Philosophy, 39(4), 381-408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10982-019-09368-0 picture_as_pdf
  • Hosni, Hykel, Montagna, Franco (2014). Stable non-standard imprecise probabilities. In Laurent, Anne, Strauss, Olivier, Bouchon-Meunier, Bernadette, Yager, Ronald R. (Eds.), Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems: 15th International Conference, IPMU 2014, Montpellier, France, July 15-19, 2014. Proceedings, Part III (pp. 436-445). Springer Berlin / Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08852-5_45
  • Lane, Peter, Gobet, Fernand (2012). CHREST models of implicit learning and board game interpretation. In Bach, Joscha, Goertzel, Ben, Iklé, Matthew (Eds.), Artificial General Intelligence: 5th International Conference, AGI 2012, Proceedings (pp. 148 - 157). Springer Berlin / Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35506-6_16
  • Makinson, David C. (2007). Friendliness and sympathy in logic. In Beziau, Jean-Yves (Ed.), Logica Universalis: Towards a General Theory of Logic (pp. 195-224). Birkhäuser (Firm).
  • Makinson, David C. (2005). Friendliness and sympathy in logic. In Beziau, Jean-Yves (Ed.), Logica Universalis (pp. 191-206). Birkhäuser (Firm).
  • Mellor, Hugh, Bradley, Richard (2022). Conditionals: truth, safety, and success. Mind & Language, 37(2), 194 - 207. https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12322 picture_as_pdf
  • Roussos, Joe, Bradley, Richard, Frigg, Roman (2021). Making confident decisions with model ensembles. Philosophy of Science, 88(3), 439-460. https://doi.org/10.1086/712818 picture_as_pdf
  • Stefansson, H. Orii, Bradley, Richard (2015). How valuable are chances? Philosophy of Science, 82(4), 602-625. https://doi.org/10.1086/682915
  • C
  • Cartwright, Nancy, Cat, Jordi, Fleck, Lola, Uebel, Thomas E. (2008). Otto Neurath: philosophy between science and politics. Cambridge University Press.
  • Chaigneau, Pierre, Edmans, Alex, Gottlieb, Daniel (2019). The informativeness principle without the first-order approach. Games and Economic Behavior, 113, 743 - 755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2018.08.006 picture_as_pdf
  • Chen, Zhanyu (2013). Pricing and hedging exotic options in stochastic volatility models [Doctoral thesis]. London School of Economics and Political Science. picture_as_pdf
  • Keen, David (2000). Going to war: how rational is it? In Carbonnier, Gilles, Fleming, Sarah (Eds.), War, Money and Survival . International Committee of the Red Cross.
  • Otsuka, Michael (2015). Risking life and limb: how to discount harms by their improbability. In Cohen, I. Glenn, Daniels, Norman, Eyal, Nir (Eds.), Identified versus Statistical Lives: An Interdisciplinary Perspective . Oxford University Press.
  • Rabinowicz, Wlodek (2010). If in doubt, treat’em equally: a case study in the application of formal methods to ethics. In Czarnecki, Tadeusz, Kijania-Placek, Katarzyna, Pollr, Olga, Wolenski, Jan (Eds.), The Analytical Way: Proceedings of the 6th European Congress of Analytic Philosophy (pp. 219-243). College Publications.
  • Rabinowicz, Wlodek (2000). Interpreting preferences. In Childers, Timothy (Ed.), The Logica Yearbook 1999 (pp. 118-139). Filosofia Publishing House.
  • Rol, Menno, Cartwright, Nancy (2012). Warranting the use of causal claims: a non-trivial case for interdisciplinarity. Theoria: Revista de Teoria, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia, 27(2), 189-202. https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.4075
  • D
  • Dall Chiara, Maria Luisa, Giuntini, Roberto, Rédei, Miklós (2007). The history of quantum logic. In Gabbay, Dov M., Woods, John (Eds.), Handbook of the History of Logic: the Many Valued and Nonmotonic Turn in Logic (pp. 205-283). Elsevier (Firm). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1874-5857(07)80007-0
  • De Lara, Michel, Gossner, Olivier (2020). Payoffs-beliefs duality and the value of information. SIAM Journal on Optimization, 30(1), 464 - 489. https://doi.org/10.1137/18M1230049 picture_as_pdf
  • Dewar, Neil, Fletcher, Samuel C., Hudetz, Laurenz (2019). Extending List’s levels. In Kus, Marek, Skowron, Bartlomiej, Kus, Marek (Eds.), Category Theory in Physics, Mathematics, and Philosophy (pp. 63-81). Springer Berlin / Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30896-4_6 picture_as_pdf
  • Dietrich, Franz (2008). Anti-terrorism politics and the risk of provoking. Department of Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method, London School of Economics and Political Science.
  • Dietrich, Franz (2010). Editorial. The Reasoner, 4(8), 117-120.
  • Dietrich, Franz (2006). General representation of epistemically optimal procedures. Social Choice and Welfare, 26(2), 263-283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-006-0094-2
  • Dietrich, Franz (2005). How to reach legitimate decisions when the procedure is controversial. Social Choice and Welfare, 24(2), 363-393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-003-0288-9
  • Dietrich, Franz (2004). Judgment aggregation: (im)possibility theorems. Journal of Economic Theory, 26(2), 286-298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2004.10.002
  • Dietrich, Franz (2007). A generalised model of judgment aggregation. Social Choice and Welfare, 28(4), 529-565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-006-0187-y
  • Dietrich, Franz (2008). The premises of Condorcet’s jury theorem are not simultaneously justified. Episteme, 5(1), 56-73. https://doi.org/10.1353/epi.0.0023
  • Dietrich, Franz, List, Christian (2008). Opinion pooling on general agendas. Department of Government, London School of Economics and Political Science.
  • Dietrich, Franz, List, Christian (2007). The impossibility of unbiased judgment aggregation. Department of Government, London School of Economics and Political Science.
  • Dietrich, Franz, Moretti, Luca (2005). On coherent sets and the transmission of confirmation. Philosophy of Science, 72(3), 403-424. https://doi.org/10.1086/498471
  • Dietrich, Franz, List, Christian (2008). A liberal paradox for judgment aggregation. Social Choice and Welfare, 31(1), 59-78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-007-0263-y
  • Dietrich, Franz, List, Christian (2013). A reason-based theory of rational choice. Noûs, 47(1), 104-134. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0068.2011.00840.x
  • Duijf, Hein (2017). Beyond team-directed reasoning: participatory intentions contribute to a theory of collective agency. Logique et Analyse,
  • Flaminio, Tommaso, Godo, Lluis, Hosni, Hykel (2015). On the algebraic structure of conditional events: 13th European conference, ECSQARU 2015, Compiègne, France, July 15-17, 2015. In Destercke, Sébastien, Denoeux, Thierry (Eds.), Symbolic and quantitative approaches to reasoning with uncertainty (pp. 106-116). Springer International (Firm). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20807-7
  • List, Christian, Dietrich, Franz (2010). The problem of constrained judgment aggregation. In The Present Situation in the Philosophy of Science (pp. 125-139). Springer Berlin / Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9115-4_10
  • Mongin, P., Dietrich, Franz (2010). An interpretive account of logical aggregation theory. Revue d’Economie Politique, 120(6), 929-972.
  • Rabinowicz, Wlodek (2011). Presumption of equality as a requirement of fairness. In Dzhafarov, Ehtibar, Perry, Lacey (Eds.), Descriptive and Normative Approaches to Human Behavior (pp. 203-224). World Scientific (Firm).
  • E
  • Elsholtz, Christian, List, Christian (2005). A simple proof of Sen's possibility theorem on majority decisions. Elemente der Mathematik, 60(2), 45-56.
  • Makinson, David C. (2007). Completeness theorems, representation theorems: what’s the difference? In Rønnow-Rasmussen, Toni, Petersson, Bjorn, Josefsson, Josef, Egonsson, Dan (Eds.), Hommage a Wlodek: Philosophical Papers Dedicated to Wlodek Rabinowicz . Lunds Universitet.
  • F
  • Flaminio, T., Godo, L., Hosni, Hykel (2013). Zero-probability and coherent betting: a logical point of view. In Symbolic and Quantiative Approaches to Resoning With Uncertainty (pp. 206-217). Springer Berlin / Heidelberg.
  • Flaminio, Tommaso, Godo, Lluis, Hosni, Hykel (2015). Coherence in the aggregate: a betting method for belief functions on many-valued events. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 58, 71-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2015.01.001
  • Flaminio, Tommaso, Godo, Lluis, Hosni, Hykel (2014). On the logical structure of de Finetti's notion of event. Journal of Applied Logic, 12(3), 279-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jal.2014.03.001
  • Frigg, Roman, Hartmann, Stephan (2007). Introduction - special issue. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 38(2), p. 231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2007.03.001
  • Frigg, Roman, Hoefer, Carl (2010). Determinism and chance from a Humean perspective. In Stadler, Friedrich (Ed.), The Present Situation in the Philosophy of Science (pp. 351-371). Springer Berlin / Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9115-4_25
  • Fumagalli, Roberto (2021). Rationality, preference satisfaction and anomalous intentions: why rational choice theory is not self-defeating. Theory and Decision, 91(3), 337 - 356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-021-09801-8 picture_as_pdf
  • Nguyen, James, Frigg, Roman (2020). Unlocking limits. Argumenta, 6(1), 31 - 45. https://doi.org/10.14275/2465-2334/202011.ngu picture_as_pdf
  • Werndl, Charlotte, Frigg, Roman (2015). Reconceptualising equilibrium in Boltzmannian statistical mechanics and characterising its existence. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 49, 19-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2014.12.002 picture_as_pdf
  • G
  • Grattan-Guinness, Ivor (2012). A new–old characterisation of logical knowledge. History and Philosophy of Logic, 33(3), 245-290. https://doi.org/10.1080/01445340.2012.675631
  • Rabinowicz, Wlodek (2004). Mechanisms of truth-directedness: comments on Pascal Engel’s "Truth and the aim of belief". In Gillies, Donald (Ed.), Laws and Models in Science (pp. 101-106). College Publications.
  • Rabinowicz, Wlodek (2008). Pragmatic arguments for rationality constraints. In Galavotti, Maria Carla, Scazzieri, Roberto, Suppes, Patrick (Eds.), Reasoning, Rationality and Probability (pp. 139-163). University of Chicago Press.
  • Rabinowicz, Wlodek (2009). Preference utilitarianism by way of preference change? In Grüne-Yanoff, Till, Hansson, Sven Ove (Eds.), Preference Change: Approaches From Philosophy, Economics and Psychology (pp. 185-206). Springer Berlin / Heidelberg.
  • H
  • Harris, Margherita (2021). Conceptualizing uncertainty: the IPCC, model robustness and the weight of evidence [Doctoral thesis]. London School of Economics and Political Science. https://doi.org/10.21953/lse.00004355
  • Hawthorne, James, Makinson, David C, (2007). The quantitative/qualitative watershed for rules of uncertain inference. Studia Logica, 86(2), 247-297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-007-9061-x
  • Hosni, Hykel (2014). Towards a Bayesian theory of second-order uncertainty: lessons from non- standard logics. In Hansson, Sven Ove (Ed.), David Makinson on Classical Methods for Non-Classical Problems (pp. 195-221). Springer Berlin / Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7759-0
  • Howson, Colin (2009). Can logic be combined with probability? Probably. Journal of Applied Logic, 7(2), 177-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jal.2007.11.003
  • Howson, Colin (2014). Finite additivity, another lottery paradox and conditionalisation. Synthese, 191(5), 989-1012. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-013-0303-3
  • Howson, Colin (2011). No answer to Hume. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 25(3), 279-284. https://doi.org/10.1080/02698595.2011.605249
  • Howson, Colin (2003). Probability and logic. Journal of Applied Logic, 1(3-4), 151-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1570-8683(03)00011-9
  • Howson, Colin (2007). Reply to Hudson: "Howson on novel confirmation". Logic and Philosophy of Science, 5(1), 33-41.
  • Howson, Colin (2007). An interview with Colin Howson. The Reasoner, 1(6), 1-3.
  • Makinson, David C. (2014). Intelim rules for classical connectives. In Hansson, Sven Ove (Ed.), David Makinson on Classical Methods for Non-Classical Problems (pp. 359-382). Springer Berlin / Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7759-0_16
  • Makinson, David C. (2009). Levels of belief in nonmonotonic reasoning. In Huber, Franz, Schmidt-Petri, Christoph (Eds.), Degrees of Belief (pp. 341-354). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9198-8_13
  • Makinson, David C. (2014). Relevance logic as a conservative extension of classical logic. In Hansson, Sven Ove (Ed.), David Makinson on Classical Methods for Non-Classical Problems (pp. 383-398). Springer Berlin / Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7759-0_17
  • Rabinowicz, Wlodek (2010). Epistemic logic: questions and answers. In Hendricks, Vincent F., Roy, Olivier (Eds.), Epistemic Logic: 5 Questions (pp. 121-128). Automatic Press/VIP.
  • J
  • Rabinowicz, Wlodek (2009). Letters from long ago: on causal decision theory and centered chances. In Johansson, Lars-Göran, Österberg, Jan, Sliwinski, Rysiek (Eds.), Logic, Ethics and All That Jazz: Essays in Honour of Jordan Howard Sobel (pp. 247-273). Uppsala universitet. Historisk-filosofiska sektionen.
  • Rabinowicz, Wlodek (2008). Presumption of equality. In Jönsson, Martin L. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2008 Lund-Rutgers Conference (pp. 109-155). Lund Universitetstrycheriet.
  • Rabinowicz, Wlodek, Jiborn, Magnus (2001). Backward induction without full trust in rationality. In Rabinowicz, Wlodek (Ed.), Value and Choice: Some Common Themes in Decision Theory and Moral Philosophy (pp. 101-120). Lund Universitetstrycheriet.
  • Rabinowicz, Wlodek, Jiborn, Magnus (2000). Re-considering the Foole’s Rejoinder: backward induction in indefinitely iterated prisoner’s dilemmas. In Rabinowicz, Wlodek (Ed.), Value and Choice: Some Common Themes in Decision Theory and Moral Philosophy (pp. 121-140). Lund Universitetstrycheriet.
  • Rabinowicz, Wlodek, Jiborn, Magnus (2003). Re-considering the Foole’s Rejoinder: backward induction in indefinitely iterated prisoner’s dilemmas. Synthese, 136(2), 135-157. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024731815957
  • K
  • Keen, David (1997). A rational kind of madness. Oxford Development Studies, 25(1), 67-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600819708424122
  • Kourousias, George, Makinson, David C. (2007). Parallel interpolation, splitting, and relevance in belief change. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 72, 994-1002.
  • Makinson, David C., Kourousias, George (2006). Respecting relevance in belief change. Análisis Filosófico, 26(1), 53-61.
  • Rabinowicz, Wlodek, Klimczyk, Joanna (2009). Relacje wartości. Etyka, 42, 85-120.
  • L
  • Lim, Jia Wei (2013). Parisian excursions of Brownian motion and their applications in mathematical finance [Doctoral thesis]. London School of Economics and Political Science. picture_as_pdf
  • List, Christian, Menzies, Peter (2008). Non-reductive physicalism and the limits of the exclusion principle. Department of Government, London School of Economics and Political Science.
  • List, Christian, Menzies, Peter (2009). Non-reductive physicalism and the limits of the exclusion principle. The Journal of Philosophy, CVI(9), 475-502.
  • List, Christian (2014). Free will, determinism, and the possibility of doing otherwise. Noûs, 48(1), 156-178. https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12019
  • List, Christian (2019). XII—What’s wrong with the consequence argument: a compatibilist libertarian response. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 119(3), 253-274. https://doi.org/10.1093/arisoc/aoz018 picture_as_pdf
  • Rabinowicz, Wlodek (2006). Analyticity: an unfinished business in possible-world semantics. In Lagerlund, Henrik, Lindström, Sten, Sliwinski, Rysiek (Eds.), Modality Matters, Twenty-Five Essays in Honour of Krister Segerberg (pp. 345-358). Uppsala universitet. Historisk-filosofiska sektionen.
  • Rabinowicz, Wlodek (2013). Value: fitting-attitudes account of. In LaFollette, Hugh (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Ethics . Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee311
  • M
  • Makinson, David C. (2013). Advice to the relevantist policeman. In Punochar, Vit, Svarny, Petr (Eds.), The Logica Yearbook 2012 (pp. 91-100). College Publications.
  • Makinson, David C. (2014). On an inferential semantics for classical logic. Logic Journal of IGPL, 22(1), 147-154. https://doi.org/10.1093/jigpal/jzt038
  • Makinson, David (2015). Gödel’s Master Argument: what is it, and what can it do? IfCoLog Journal of Logics and their Applications, 2(2), 1-16.
  • Makinson, David C. (2012). Logical questions behind the lottery and preface paradoxes: lossy rules for uncertain inference. Synthese, 186(2), 511-529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-011-9997-2
  • Makinson, David C. (2009). Propositional relevance through letter-sharing. Journal of Applied Logic, 7(4), 377-387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jal.2008.12.001
  • Montuschi, Eleonora (2010). Order of man, order of nature: Francis Bacon’s idea of a ‘dominion’ over nature. (Order: God's, Man's and Nature's: Discussion Paper). London School of Economics and Political Science. Centre for Philosophy of Natural and Social Science.
  • Montuschi, Eleonora (2010). Order, disorder, noise. (Order: God's, Man's and Nature's: Discussion Paper). London School of Economics and Political Science. Centre for Philosophy of Natural and Social Science.
  • Montuschi, Eleonora (2012). Ordering knowledge by methodical doubt: Francis Bacon's constructive scepticism. (Order: God's, Man's and Nature's: Discussion Paper). London School of Economics and Political Science. Centre for Philosophy of Natural and Social Science.
  • Montuschi, Eleonora (2011). Pluralism: a curse or a blessing for social order? (Order: God's, Man's and Nature's: Discussion Paper). London School of Economics and Political Science. Centre for Philosophy of Natural and Social Science.
  • Morett, Fernando (2014). Advances on a methodology of design and engineering in economics and political science [Doctoral thesis]. London School of Economics and Political Science. picture_as_pdf
  • Mulligan, Kevin, Rabinowicz, Wlodek (2009). Editorial. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 12(4), 327-328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-009-9190-6
  • N
  • Norton, John D., Roberts, Bryan W. (2012). Galileo's refutation of the speed-distance law of fall rehabilitated. Centaurus, 54(2), 148-164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0498.2012.00260.x
  • O
  • Orri Stefansson, Hlynur (2014). Decision theory and counterfactual evaluation [Doctoral thesis]. London School of Economics and Political Science. picture_as_pdf
  • Otsuka, Michael (2014). Can an incompatibilist outfox a compatibilist hedgehog? Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, Online, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2014.884272
  • Otsuka, Michael (2008). Double effect, triple effect and the trolley problem: squaring the circle in looping cases. Utilitas, 20(1), 92-110. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820807002932
  • Otsuka, Michael (2000). Scanlon and the claims of the many versus the one. Analysis, 60(3), 288-293. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/60.3.288
  • Otsuka, Michael (2004). Skepticism about saving the greater number. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 32(4), 413-426. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2004.00020.x
  • Rabinowicz, Wlodek (2006). Levi on money pumps and diachronic Dutch-book arguments. In Olsson, Erik J. (Ed.), Kowledge and Inquiry: Essays on the Pragmatism of Isaac Levi (pp. 289-312). Cambridge University Press.
  • P
  • Pettit, Philip (2013). A response to Roger Scruton: no, democracy is not overrated.
  • Picinali, Federico (2014). Legal reasoning as fact finding? A contribution to the analysis of criminal adjudication. Jurisprudence, 5(2), 299-327. https://doi.org/10.5235/20403313.5.2.299
  • R
  • Rabinowicz, Wlodek, Rønnow-Rasmussen, Toni (Eds.) (2003). Patterns of value: essays on formal axiology and value analysis. Lund Universitetstrycheriet.
  • Rabinowicz, Wlodek, Rønnow-Rasmussen, Toni (Eds.) (2004). Patterns of value: essays on formal axiology and value analysis. Lund Universitetstrycheriet.
  • Rabinowicz, Wlodek (Ed.) (2000). Value and choice: some common themes in decision theory and moral philosophy. Lund Universitetstrycheriet.
  • Rabinowicz, Wlodek (Ed.) (2001). Value and choice: some common themes in decision theory and moral philosophy. Lund Universitetstrycheriet.
  • Rabinowicz, Wlodek (2000). Backward induction in games: an attempt at logical reconstruction. In Rabinowicz, Wlodek (Ed.), Value and Choice: Some Common Themes in Decision Theory and Moral Philosophy (pp. 243-256). Lund Universitetstrycheriet.
  • Rabinowicz, Wlodek (2009). Broome and the intuition of neutrality. Philosophical Issues, 19(1), 389-411. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-6077.2009.00174.x
  • Rabinowicz, Wlodek (2011). Democracy: two models. In Sliwinski, Rysiek, Svensson, Frans (Eds.), Neither/Nor: Philosophical Essays Dedicated to Erik Carlson on the Occasion of His 50th Birthday (pp. 219-241). Uppsala universitet. Historisk-filosofiska sektionen.
  • Rabinowicz, Wlodek (2003). Discussion: Ryberg's doubts about higher and lower pleasures: put to rest? Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 6(2), 231-235. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024447122558
  • Rabinowicz, Wlodek (2001). Does deliberation crowd out self-prediction? In Rabinowicz, Wlodek (Ed.), Value and Choice: Some Common Themes in Decision Theory and Moral Philosophy (pp. 163-192). Lund Universitetstrycheriet.
  • Rabinowicz, Wlodek (2011-09-15 - 2011-09-18) Does irrationality make one vulnerable to exploitation [Paper]. Rationality and its limits: proceedings of the 2011 Moscow meeting of the Institut International de Philosophie, Moscow, Russian Federation, RUS.
  • Rabinowicz, Wlodek (2002). Does practical deliberation crowd out self-prediction? Erkenntnis, 57(1), 91-122. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020106622032
  • Rabinowicz, Wlodek (2004). Modeling parity and incomparability. In Rabinowicz, Wlodek, Rønnow-Rasmussen, Toni (Eds.), Patterns of Value: Essays on Formal Axiology and Value Analysis (pp. 201-228). Lund Universitetstrycheriet.
  • Rabinowicz, Wlodek (2010). Odwracanie ról: odpowiedź na artykuł Krzysztofa Saji. Analiza I Egzystencja, 12(2010), 59-66.
  • Rabinowicz, Wlodek (2010). Om värderelationer. Filosofisk Tidskrift, 2010(1), 13-27.
  • Rabinowicz, Wlodek (2002). Prioritarianism for prospects. Utilitas, 14(1), 2-21. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820800003368
  • Rabinowicz, Wlodek (2001). Remarks on the absentminded driver. In Rabinowicz, Wlodek (Ed.), Value and Choice: Some Common Themes in Decision Theory and Moral Philosophy (pp. 192-207). Lund Universitetstrycheriet.
  • Rabinowicz, Wlodek (2003). Remarks on the absentminded driver. Studia Logica, 73(2), 241-256. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022936030634
  • Rabinowicz, Wlodek (2008). Value relations. Theoria, 74(1), 18-49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-2567.2008.00008.x
  • Rabinowicz, Wlodek (2011). Value relations: old wine in new barrels. In Reboul, Anne (Ed.), Philosophical Papers Dedicated to Kevin Mulligan . Université de Genève, Faculté des lettres.
  • Rabinowicz, Wlodek (2009). Values compared. Polish Journal of Philosophy, 3(1), 73-96.
  • Rabinowicz, Wlodek (2008). Värdejämförelser. Kungl. Vitterhets Historie Och Antikvitets Akademiens åRsbok, 2008, 77-94.
  • Rabinowicz, Wlodek (2000). A centipede for intransitive preferrers. In Rabinowicz, Wlodek (Ed.), Value and Choice: Some Common Themes in Decision Theory and Moral Philosophy (pp. 235-242). Lund Universitetstrycheriet.
  • Rabinowicz, Wlodek (2001). A centipede for intransitive preferrers. Studia Logica, 67(2), 167-178. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010586802757
  • Rabinowicz, Wlodek (2003). The size of inequality and its badness: some reflections around Temkin's "inequality". Theoria, 69(1-2), 60-84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-2567.2003.tb00754.x
  • Rabinowicz, Wlodek, Rønnow-Rasmussen, Toni (2006). Buck-passing and the right kind of reasons. Philosophical Quarterly, 56(222), 114-120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9213.2005.00432.x
  • Rabinowicz, Wlodek, Rønnow-Rasmussen, Toni (2004). The strike of the demon: on fitting pro-attitudes and value. Ethics, 114(3), 391-423. https://doi.org/10.1086/381694
  • Rabinowicz, Wlodek, Saja, Krzysztof (2010). Utylitaryzm preferencji poprzez zmianę preferencji? Analiza I Egzystencja, 12(2010), 7-36.
  • Reiss, Julian (2009). Counterfactuals though experiments, and singular causal analysis in history. Philosophy of Science, 76(5), 712-723. https://doi.org/10.1086/605826
  • Roberts, Bryan W. (2011). How Galileo dropped the ball and Fermat picked it up. Synthese, 180(3), 337-356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9705-7
  • Roberts, Bryan W. (2010-11-04 - 2010-11-06) How to time reverse a quantum system [Paper]. PSA 2010 Biennial Meeting, Montréal, Canada, CAN.
  • Roberts, Bryan W. (2010-07-08 - 2010-07-09) How to time reverse a quantum system [Paper]. British Society for the Philosophy of Science Annual Meeting, Dublin, Ireland, IRL.
  • Roberts, Bryan W. (2010-02-08 - 2010-02-09) How to time reverse a quantum system [Paper]. North Carolina Philosophical Society annual meeting, North Carolina, United States, USA.
  • Roberts, Bryan W. (2012). Kramers degeneracy without eigenvectors. Physical Review A, 86(3). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.86.034103
  • Roberts, Bryan W. (2013). The simple failure of Curie’s principle. Philosophy of Science, 80(4), 579-592. https://doi.org/10.1086/673212
  • Roberts, Bryan W. (2017). Unreal observables. Philosophy of Science, 84(5), 1265-1274. https://doi.org/10.1086/694298
  • Rodgers, Ewan (2015). Facing difficult decisions: when to give priority and why.
  • Rédei, Miklós (2001). Facets of quantum logic. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 32(1), 101-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1355-2198(00)00013-7
  • Rédei, Miklós, Werndl, Charlotte (2012). On the history of the isomorphism problem of dynamical systems with special regard to von Neumann’s contribution. Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 66(1), 71-93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00407-011-0089-y
  • S
  • Sartori, Lorenzo (2023). Putting the experiment back into the thought experiment. Synthese, 201(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-04011-3 picture_as_pdf
  • Steele, Katie Siobhan (2012). Testimony as evidence: more problems for linear pooling. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 41(6), 983-999. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-012-9227-5
  • Steele, Katie, Werndl, Charlotte (2016). Model tuning in engineering: uncovering the logic. Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design, 51(1), 63-71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309324715575445
  • Suárez, Mauricio (2011). Probabilities, causes and propensities in physics. Springer Berlin / Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9904-5
  • T
  • Thoma, Johanna (2020). In defence of revealed preference theory. Economics and Philosophy, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267120000073 picture_as_pdf
  • Thoma, Johanna, Weisberg, Jonathan (2019). No escape from Allais: reply to Buchak. Philosophical Studies, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-019-01322-z picture_as_pdf
  • V
  • van Basshuysen, Philippe (2017). Book review: the prisoner’s dilemma, Martin Peterson (ed.). Cambridge University Press, 2015, viii + 298 pages. Economics and Philosophy, 33(1), 153-160. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267116000249
  • van Basshuysen, Philippe (2017). Book review: the world the game theorists made, by Paul Erickson. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015, 390 pp., £24.50, ISBN 978-0-226-09703-9 (cloth), 978-0-226-09717-6 (paper), 978-0-226-09720-6 (e-book). European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, https://doi.org/10.1080/09672567.2017.1285121
  • W
  • Werndl, Charlotte (2019). Initial-condition dependence and initial-condition uncertainty in climate science. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 70(4), 953 - 976. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axy021
  • Wrigley, Wesley (2025). Syllogistic logic and mathematical proof by Paolo Mancosu and Massimo Mugnai, pp. 240, £60 (hard), ISBN 978-0-19887-692-2, Oxford University Press (2023). Mathematical Gazette, 109(574), 185 - 187. https://doi.org/10.1017/mag.2025.44