Schankerman, Mark

Number of items: 119.
Centre for Economic Performance
  • Cockburn, Iain, Lanjouw, Jean O., Schankerman, Mark (2014). Patents and the global diffusion of new drugs. (CEP Discussion Papers CEPDP1298). London School of Economics and Political Science. Centre for Economic Performance.
  • Bloom, Nick, Schankerman, Mark, Van Reenen, John (2013). Identifying technology spillovers and product market rivalry. Econometrica, 81(4), 1347-1393. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA9466
  • Galasso, Alberto, Schankerman, Mark (2013). Patents and cumulative innovation: causal evidence from the courts. (CEP Discussion Papers CEPDP1205). London School of Economics and Political Science. Centre for Economic Performance.
  • Belenzon, Sharon, Schankerman, Mark (2012). Spreading the word: geography, policy and knowledge spillovers. (CEP Discussion Papers CEPDP1005). London School of Economics and Political Science. Centre for Economic Performance. picture_as_pdf
  • Lach, Saul, Schankerman, Mark (2008). Incentives and invention in universities. (EDS Discussion Papers EDS DP016). EDS Innovation Research Programme, London School of Economics and Political Science.
  • Belenzon, Sharon, Schankerman, Mark (2008). Motivation and sorting in open source software innovation. (EDS Discussion Papers EDS DP019). EDS Innovation Research Programme, London School of Economics and Political Science.
  • Galasso, Alberto, Schankerman, Mark (2008). Patent thickets and the market for innovation: evidence from settlement of patent disputes. (CEP Discussion Papers 889). London School of Economics and Political Science. Centre for Economic Performance.
  • Belenzon, Sharon, Schankerman, Mark (2008). Motivation and sorting in open source software innovation. (CEP Discussion Papers CEPDP0893). London School of Economics and Political Science. Centre for Economic Performance.
  • Lach, Saul, Schankerman, Mark (2007). Incentives and invention in universities. (CEP Discussion Papers CEPDP0729). London School of Economics and Political Science. Centre for Economic Performance. picture_as_pdf
  • Belenzon, Sharon, Schankerman, Mark (2007). The impact of private ownership, incentives and local development objectives on university technology transfer performance. (CEP Discussion Papers CEPDP0779). London School of Economics and Political Science. Centre for Economic Performance. picture_as_pdf
  • Bloom, Nick, Schankerman, Mark, Van Reenen, John (2007). Identifying technology spillovers and product market rivalry. (NBER working paper 13060). National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Bloom, Nick, Schankerman, Mark, Van Reenen, John (2005-11-18 - 2005-11-19) Identifying technology spillovers and product market rivalry [Paper]. Productivity Growth: Causes and Consequences, San Francisco, United States, USA.
  • Bloom, Nick, Schankerman, Mark, Van Reenen, John (2005). Identifying technology spillovers and product market rivalry. (CEP discussion paper 675). London School of Economics and Political Science. Centre for Economic Performance.
  • Bloom, Nick, Schankerman, Mark, Van Reenen, John (2005). Identifying technology spillovers and product market rivalry. (CEPR discussion paper 4912). Centre for Economic Policy Research (Great Britain).
  • Bloom, Nick, Schankerman, Mark, Van Reenen, John (2005). Identifying technology spillovers and product market rivalry. Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines.
    • Economics
  • Galasso, Alberto, Schankerman, Mark (2024). Licensing life-saving drugs for developing countries: evidence from the medicines patent pool. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 106(6), 1529 – 1541. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_01253 picture_as_pdf
  • Schankerman, Mark, Schuett, Florian (2022). Patent screening, innovation, and welfare. Review of Economic Studies, 89(4), 2101 – 2148. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdab073 picture_as_pdf
  • Lach, Saul, Neeman, Zvika, Schankerman, Mark (2021). Government financing of R&D: a mechanism design approach. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 13(3), 238 - 272. https://doi.org/10.1257/mic.20190053 picture_as_pdf
  • Galasso, Alberto, Schankerman, Mark (2018). Patent rights, innovation, and firm exit. RAND Journal of Economics, 49(1), 64-86. https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-2171.12219
  • Schankerman, Mark (6 July 2017) Strong patent rights accelerate the diffusion of new medicines across countries. LSE Business Review. picture_as_pdf
  • Cockburn, Iain, Lanjouw, Jean O., Schankerman, Mark (2016). Patents and the global diffusion of new drugs. American Economic Review, 106(1), 136-164. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20141482
  • Galasso, Alberto, Schankerman, Mark (2015). Patents and cumulative innovation: causal evidence from the courts. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130(1), 317 - 369. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qju029
  • Cockburn, Iain, Lanjouw, Jean O., Schankerman, Mark (2014). Patents and the global diffusion of new drugs. (CEP Discussion Papers CEPDP1298). London School of Economics and Political Science. Centre for Economic Performance.
  • Noel, Michael, Schankerman, Mark (2013). Strategic patenting and software innovation. Journal of Industrial Economics, 61(3), 481-520. https://doi.org/10.1111/joie.12024
  • Bloom, Nick, Schankerman, Mark, Van Reenen, John (2013). Identifying technology spillovers and product market rivalry. Econometrica, 81(4), 1347-1393. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA9466
  • Belenzon, Sharon, Schankerman, Mark (2013). Spreading the word: geography, policy and knowledge spillovers. Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(3), 884-903. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00334
  • Galasso, Alberto, Schankerman, Mark, Serrano, Carlos J. (2013). Trading and enforcing patent rights. RAND Journal of Economics, 44(2), 275-312. https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-2171.12020
  • Schankerman, Mark (2013). Introduction: journal of industrial economics. Journal of Industrial Economics, 61(3), 471-480. https://doi.org/10.1111/joie.12020
  • Belenzon, Sharon, Schankerman, Mark (2012). Spreading the word: geography, policy and knowledge spillovers. (CEP Discussion Papers CEPDP1005). London School of Economics and Political Science. Centre for Economic Performance. picture_as_pdf
  • Galasso, Alberto, Schankerman, Mark, Serrano, Carlos J. (2011). Trading and enforcing patent rights. (CEP Discussion Papers CEPDP1072). London School of Economics and Political Science. Centre for Economic Performance. picture_as_pdf
  • Lerner, Josh, Schankerman, Mark (2010). The comingled code: open source and economic development. MIT Press.
  • Belenzon, Sharon, Schankerman, Mark (2010). Spreading the word: geography, policy and university knowledge diffusion. (Economics of industry EI50). Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines.
  • Galasso, Alberto, Schankerman, Mark (2010). Patent thickets, courts, and the market for innovation. RAND Journal of Economics, 41(3), 472-503. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2171.2010.00108.x
  • Schankerman, Mark (2009). Improving patent incentives and enforcement. Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, 4(11), 798-808. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpp145
  • Schankerman, Mark (2009). Comments. In Foray, D. (Ed.), The New Economics of Technology Policy (pp. 122-126). Edward Elgar.
  • Schankerman, Mark (2009). Comments on "A policy shaped research agenda on the economics of science and technology". In Foray, D. (Ed.), The New Economics of Techonolgy Policy . Edward Elgar.
  • Belenzon, Sharon, Schankerman, Mark (2009). University knowledge transfer: private ownership, incentives, and local development objectives. Journal of Law and Economics, 52(1), 111-144. https://doi.org/10.1086/595763
  • Lach, Saul, Schankerman, Mark (2008). Incentives and invention in universities. (EDS Discussion Papers EDS DP016). EDS Innovation Research Programme, London School of Economics and Political Science.
  • Belenzon, Sharon, Schankerman, Mark (2008). Motivation and sorting in open source software innovation. (EDS Discussion Papers EDS DP019). EDS Innovation Research Programme, London School of Economics and Political Science.
  • Galasso, Alberto, Schankerman, Mark (2008). Patent thickets and the market for innovation: evidence from settlement of patent disputes. (CEP Discussion Papers 889). London School of Economics and Political Science. Centre for Economic Performance.
  • Lach, Saul, Schankerman, Mark (2008). Incentives and invention in universities. RAND Journal of Economics, 39(2), 403-433. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0741-6261.2008.00020.x
  • Belenzon, Sharon, Schankerman, Mark (2008). Motivation and sorting in open source software innovation. (CEP Discussion Papers CEPDP0893). London School of Economics and Political Science. Centre for Economic Performance.
  • Schankerman, Mark (2007). Harnessing success: incentives for invention and technology transfer in universities. Centrepiece, 12(2), 2-5. https://doi.org/CEPCP231
  • Lach, Saul, Schankerman, Mark (2007). Incentives and invention in universities. London School of Economics and Political Science. Centre for Economic Performance.
  • Bloom, Nick, Schankerman, Mark, Van Reenen, John (2007). Identifying technology spillovers and product market rivalry. (NBER working paper 13060). National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Belenzon, Sharon, Schankerman, Mark (2007). Harnessing success: determinants of university technology licensing performance. Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines.
  • Noel, Michael, Schankerman, Mark (2006). Strategic patenting and software innovation. (CEP Discussion Papers CEPDP0740). London School of Economics and Political Science. Centre for Economic Performance. picture_as_pdf
  • Noel, Michael, Schankerman, Mark (2006). Strategic patenting and software innovation. London School of Economics and Political Science. Centre for Economic Performance.
  • Belenzon, Sharon, Schankerman, Mark (2006). Harnessing success: determinants of university technology licensing performance. Centre for Economic Policy Research (Great Britain).
  • Noel, Michael, Schankerman, Mark (2006). Strategic patenting and software innovation. Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines.
  • Noel, Michael D., Schankerman, Mark (2006). Strategic patenting and software innovation. Centre for Economic Policy Research (Great Britain).
  • Bloom, Nick, Schankerman, Mark, Van Reenen, John (2005-11-18 - 2005-11-19) Identifying technology spillovers and product market rivalry [Paper]. Productivity Growth: Causes and Consequences, San Francisco, United States, USA.
  • Bloom, Nick, Schankerman, Mark, Van Reenen, John (2005). Identifying technology spillovers and product market rivalry. (CEP discussion paper 675). London School of Economics and Political Science. Centre for Economic Performance.
  • Bloom, Nick, Schankerman, Mark, Van Reenen, John (2005). Identifying technology spillovers and product market rivalry. (CEPR discussion paper 4912). Centre for Economic Policy Research (Great Britain).
  • Bloom, Nick, Schankerman, Mark, Van Reenen, John (2005). Identifying technology spillovers and product market rivalry. Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines.
  • Schankerman, Mark (2004). On the welfare effects and political economy of competition-enhancing policies. The Economic Journal, 114(498), 800-824. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2004.00244.x
  • Lanjouw, J., Schankerman, Mark (2004). Patent quality and research productivity: measuring innovation with multiple indicators. The Economic Journal, 114(495), 441-465. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2004.00216.x
  • Lanjouw, Jean O., Schankerman, Mark (2004). Protecting intellectual property rights: are small firms handicapped? Journal of Law and Economics, 47(1), 45-74.
  • Lach, Saul, Schankerman, Mark (2004). Incentives and invention in universities. Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines.
  • Saul, Lach, Schankerman, Mark (2004). Royalty sharing and technology licensing in universities. Journal of the European Economic Association, 2(2/3), 252-264.
  • Schankerman, Mark (2003). Book review: patents, citations & innovations: a window on the knowledge economy. The Economic Journal, 113(491), 653-654. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0013-0133.2003.172_1.x
  • Lach, Saul, Schankerman, Mark (2003). Incentives and invention in universities. Centre for Economic Policy Research (Great Britain).
  • Lach, Saul, Schankerman, Mark (2003). Incentives and invention in universities. National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Lanjouw, Jean O., Schankerman, Mark (2003-03-14 - 2003-03-15) Identifying technology spillovers and product market rivalry [Paper]. Empirical Economics of Innovation and Patenting, Mannheim, Germany, DEU.
  • Lanjouw, Jean O., Schankerman, Mark (2003-03-14 - 2003-03-15) Enforcing patent rights: an empirical study [Paper]. Empirical Economics of Innovation and Patenting, Mannheim, Germany, DEU.
  • Lanjouw, Jean O., Schankerman, Mark (2003). Enforcement of patent rights in the United States. In Cohen, W. M. & Merrill, S. A. (Eds.), Patents in the Knowledge-Based Economy (pp. 145-179). National Academies Press (U.S.).
  • Olson Lanjouw, Jean, Schankerman, Mark (2002). Research productivity and patent quality: measurement with multiple indicators. (STICERD Discussion Paper EI/32). Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines.
  • Schankerman, Mark, Lanjouw, Jean O. (2002). Research productivity and patent quality: measurement with multiple indicators. (CEPR Press Discussion Paper 3623). Centre for Economic Policy Research (Great Britain).
  • Schankerman, Mark (2002). Idiosyncratic and common shocks to investment decisions. The Economic Journal, 112(482), 766-785. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00070
  • Olson Lanjouw, Jean, Schankerman, Mark (2001). Enforcing intellectual property rights. Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines.
  • Lanjouw, Peter, Schankerman, Mark (2001). Enforcing intellectual property rights. Centre for Economic Policy Research (Great Britain).
  • Olson Lanjouw, Jean, Schankerman, Mark (2001). Enforcing intellectual property rights. National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Schankerman, Mark, Lanjouw, J. (2001). Characteristics of patent litigation: a window on competition. RAND Journal of Economics, 32(1), 129-151.
  • Schankerman, Mark, Scotchmer, Suzanne (2001). Damages and injunctions in protecting intellectual property. RAND Journal of Economics, 32(1), 199-220.
  • Aghion, Philippe, Schankerman, Mark (2000). An analytical framework for evaluating transition impact of infrastructure projects. European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
  • Schankerman, Mark, Scotchmer, Suzanne (2000). Damages and injunctions in protecting proprietary research tools. Centre for Economic Policy Research (Great Britain).
  • Aghion, Philippe, Schankerman, Mark (2000). A model of market-enhancing infrastructure. Centre for Economic Policy Research (Great Britain).
  • Hellman, Joel S., Jones, Geraint, Kaufmann, Daniel, Schankerman, Mark (2000). Measuring governance, corruption, and state capture: how firms and bureaucrats shape the business environment in transition economies. World Bank.
  • Schankerman, Mark, Scotchmer, Suzanne (2000). Damages and injunctions in protecting proprietary research tools. Berkeley Electronic Press.
  • Hellman, Joel, Schankerman, Mark (2000). Intervention, corruption and capture: the nexus between enterprises and the state. Economics of Transition, 8(3), 545-799. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0351.00055
  • Lanjouw, Jean O., Schankerman, Mark (1999). The quality of ideas: measuring innovation with multiple indicators. National Bureau for Economic Research.
  • Schankerman, Mark, Scotchmer, Suzanne (1999). Damages and injunctions in the protection of proprietary research tools. National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Aghion, Philippe, Schankerman, Mark (1999). Competition, entry and the social returns to infrastructure in transition economies. Economics of Transition, 7(1), 79-101. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0351.00005
  • Aghion, Philippe, Schankerman, Mark (1999). Competition, entry, and the social returns to infrastructure in transition economies. Centre for Economic Policy Research (Great Britain).
  • Cornelli, Francesca, Schankerman, Mark (1999). Patent renewals and R&D incentives. RAND Journal of Economics, 30(2), 197-213.
  • Lanjouw, Jenny, Schankerman, Mark (1998). Patent suits: do they distort research incentives? Centre for Economic Policy Research (Great Britain).
  • Cornelli, Francesca, Schankerman, Mark (1998). Patent renewals and r&d incentives. Centre for Economic Policy Research (Great Britain).
  • Olson Lanjouw, Jean, Schankerman, Mark (1998). Stylised fact of patent litigation: value, scope and ownership. Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines.
  • Schankerman, Mark (1998). How valuable is patent protection? Estimates by technology field. RAND Journal of Economics, 29(1), 77-107.
  • Lanjouw, Jean O., Schankerman, Mark (1997). Stylized facts of patent litigation: value, scope and ownership. National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Schankerman, Mark (1997). Book review: privatizing Russia. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(2), 818-820.
  • Commander, Simon, Schankerman, Mark (1997). Enterprise restructuring and social benefits. Economics of Transition, 5(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0351.1997.tb00001.x
  • Schankerman, Mark (1997). Governance in transition. In Transition Report 1997: Enterprise Performance and Growth (pp. 48-59). European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
  • Aghion, Philippe, Schankerman, Mark (1997). Growth in transition economies: sources and obstacles. In Transition Report 1997: Enterprise Performance and Growth (pp. 48-59). European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
  • Schankerman, Mark (1996). Symmetric regulation for competitive telecommunications. Information Economics and Policy, 8(1), 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6245(95)00010-0
  • Bishop, V, Mody, A, Schankerman, Mark (1996). Exploiting new market opportunities in telecommunications. In Mody, A. (Ed.), Infrastructure Delivery: Private Initiative and the Public Good (pp. 37-78). World Bank.
  • Cornelli, Francesca, Schankerman, Mark (1996). Optimal patent renewals. Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines.
  • Schankerman, Mark (1991). Revisions and investment plans and the stock market rate of return. National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Schankerman, Mark (1991). Revisions of investment plans and the stock market rate of return. Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines.
  • Schankerman, Mark (1991). How valuable is patent protection? Estimates by technology field using patent renewal data. (CEP Discussion Papers CEPDP0046). London School of Economics and Political Science. Centre for Economic Performance.
  • Schankerman, Mark (1991). How valuable is patent protection? Estimates by technology field using patent renewal data. (CEP discussion paper 46). London School of Economics and Political Science. Centre for Economic Performance.
  • Schankerman, Mark (1991). How valuable is patent protection? Estimates by technology field using patent renewal data. National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Lach, Saul, Schankerman, Mark (1989). Dynamics of r&d and investment in the scientific sector. Journal of Political Economy, 97(4), 880-904.
  • Lach, Saul, Schankerman, Mark (1987). The interaction between capital investment and r&d in science-based firms. National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Schankerman, Mark (1987). Comment on long run trends in patents. In Griliches, Z. (Ed.), R&d, Patents and Productivity . University of Chicago Press.
  • Schankerman, Mark, Nadiri, M. Ishaq (1987). Investment in r&d, costs of adjustment and expectations. In Griliches, Z. (Ed.), R&d, Patents and Productivity (pp. 315-338). University of Chicago Press.
  • Pakes, Ariel, Schankerman, Mark (1987). An exploration into the determinants of research intensity. In Griliches, Z. (Ed.), R&d, Patents and Productivity (pp. 209-232). University of Chicago Press.
  • Pakes, Ariel, Schankerman, Mark (1987). The rate of obsolescence of patents, research gestation lags, and the private rate of return to research resources. In Griliches, Z. (Ed.), R&d, Patents and Productivity (pp. 73-88). University of Chicago Press.
  • Schankerman, Mark, Pakes, Ariel (1987). Estimates of the value of patent rights in European countries during the post-1950 period. National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Gordon, Roger H., Schankerman, Mark (1987). Estimating the effects of r&d on Bell system productivity: a model of embodied technical change. National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Schankerman, Mark, Nadiri, M. Ishaq (1987). Restricted cost functions and the rate of return to quasi-fixed factors, with an application to r&d and capital in the Bell system. National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Schankerman, Mark, Pakes, Ariel (1986). Estimates of the value of patent rights in European countries during the post-1950 period. The Economic Journal, 96(384), 1052-1076.
  • Gordon, Roger, Schankerman, Mark, Spady, Richard (1986). Estimating the effects of r&d on Bell system productivity: a model of embodied technical change. In Peston, M. H. & Quandt, R. E. (Eds.), Prices, Competition and Equilibrium (pp. 164-190). Philip Allan.
  • Schankerman, Mark, Nadiri, M. Ishaq (1986). A test of static equilibrium models and rates of return to quasi-fixed factors, with an application to the Bell system. Journal of Econometrics, 33(1-2), 97-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(86)90029-1
  • Schankerman, Mark, Pakes, Ariel (1985). Valeur et obsolescence des brevets: une analyse des statistiques de renouvellement des brevets européens. Revue Economique, (5), 917-942.
  • Schankerman, Mark, Nadiri, M. Ishaq (1982). Investment in r&d, costs of adjustment and expectations. National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Schankerman, Mark (1981). The effects of double-counting and expensing on the measured returns to r&d. Review of Economics and Statistics, 63(3), 454-459.
  • Nadiri, M. Ishaq, Schankerman, Mark (1981). Technical change, returns to scale, and the productivity slowdown. American Economic Review, 71(2), 314-319.
  • Nadiri, M. Ishaq, Schankerman, Mark (1981). The structure of production, technological change, and the rate of growth of total factor productivity in the U.S. Bell system. In Cowing, T. G. & Stevenson, R. E. (Eds.), Productivity Measurement in Regulated Industries (pp. 219-247). Academic Press.
  • Nadiri, M. Ishaq, Schankerman, Mark (1980). Variable cost functions and the rate of return to quasi-fixed factors: an application to r and d in the Bell system. National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Pakes, Ariel, Schankerman, Mark (1980). An exploration into the determinants of research intensity. National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Nadiri, M. Ishaq, Schankerman, Mark (1979). The structure of production, technological change, and the rate of growth of total factor productivity in the Bell system. National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Pakes, Ariel, Schankerman, Mark (1979). The rate of obsolescence of knowledge, research gestation lags, and the private rate of return to research resources. National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Schankerman, Mark (1976). Common costs in pharmaceutical research and development: implications for direct price regulation. In Mitchell, S. & Link, E. (Eds.), Impact of Public Policy on Drug Innovation and Pricing (pp. 3-26). American University Press Services.
  • Comanor, William S., Schankerman, Mark (1976). Identical bids and cartel behavior. Bell Journal of Economics, 7(1), 281-286.
    • LSE
  • Schankerman, Mark, Galasso, Alberto (2022). Replication data for: Licensing Life-Saving Drugs for Developing Countries: Evidence from the Medicines Patent Pool. [Dataset]. Harvard Dataverse. https://doi.org/10.7910/dvn/8aapih
  • Schankerman, Mark, Schuett, Florian (2021). Replication package for: Patent Screening, Innovation, and Welfare. [Dataset]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5519451
  • Schankerman, Mark, Lach, Saul, Neeman, Zvika (2021). Data and Code for: Government Financing of R&D: A mechanism Design Approach". [Dataset]. OpenICPSR. https://doi.org/10.3886/e120229
  • Belenzon, Sharon, Schankerman, Mark (2015). Motivation and sorting of human capital in open innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 36(6), 795-820. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2284
  • Schankerman, Mark, Belenzon, Sharon (2014). Replication data for: Spreading the Word: Geography, Policy, and Knowledge Spillovers. [Dataset]. Harvard Dataverse. https://doi.org/10.7910/dvn/25391
  • Schankerman, Mark (2001). Idiosyncratic and common shocks to investment decisions. (CEPR Discussion papers 2982). Centre for Economic Policy Research, London School of Economics and Political Science.
    • STICERD
  • Schankerman, Mark (6 July 2017) Strong patent rights accelerate the diffusion of new medicines across countries. LSE Business Review. picture_as_pdf
  • Galasso, Alberto, Schankerman, Mark (2015). Patents and cumulative innovation: causal evidence from the courts. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130(1), 317 - 369. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qju029
  • Cockburn, Iain, Lanjouw, Jean O., Schankerman, Mark (2014). Patents and the global diffusion of new drugs. (CEP Discussion Papers CEPDP1298). London School of Economics and Political Science. Centre for Economic Performance.
  • Noel, Michael, Schankerman, Mark (2013). Strategic patenting and software innovation. Journal of Industrial Economics, 61(3), 481-520. https://doi.org/10.1111/joie.12024
  • Bloom, Nick, Schankerman, Mark, Van Reenen, John (2013). Identifying technology spillovers and product market rivalry. Econometrica, 81(4), 1347-1393. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA9466
  • Belenzon, Sharon, Schankerman, Mark (2013). Spreading the word: geography, policy and knowledge spillovers. Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(3), 884-903. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00334
  • Galasso, Alberto, Schankerman, Mark, Serrano, Carlos J. (2013). Trading and enforcing patent rights. RAND Journal of Economics, 44(2), 275-312. https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-2171.12020
  • Schankerman, Mark (2013). Introduction: journal of industrial economics. Journal of Industrial Economics, 61(3), 471-480. https://doi.org/10.1111/joie.12020
  • Lerner, Josh, Schankerman, Mark (2010). The comingled code: open source and economic development. MIT Press.
  • Belenzon, Sharon, Schankerman, Mark (2010). Spreading the word: geography, policy and university knowledge diffusion. (Economics of industry EI50). Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines.
  • Galasso, Alberto, Schankerman, Mark (2010). Patent thickets, courts, and the market for innovation. RAND Journal of Economics, 41(3), 472-503. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2171.2010.00108.x
  • Schankerman, Mark (2009). Improving patent incentives and enforcement. Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, 4(11), 798-808. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpp145
  • Schankerman, Mark (2009). Comments. In Foray, D. (Ed.), The New Economics of Technology Policy (pp. 122-126). Edward Elgar.
  • Schankerman, Mark (2009). Comments on "A policy shaped research agenda on the economics of science and technology". In Foray, D. (Ed.), The New Economics of Techonolgy Policy . Edward Elgar.
  • Belenzon, Sharon, Schankerman, Mark (2009). University knowledge transfer: private ownership, incentives, and local development objectives. Journal of Law and Economics, 52(1), 111-144. https://doi.org/10.1086/595763
  • Lach, Saul, Schankerman, Mark (2008). Incentives and invention in universities. RAND Journal of Economics, 39(2), 403-433. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0741-6261.2008.00020.x
  • Belenzon, Sharon, Schankerman, Mark (2008). Motivation and sorting in open source software innovation. (CEP Discussion Papers CEPDP0893). London School of Economics and Political Science. Centre for Economic Performance.
  • Schankerman, Mark (2007). Harnessing success: incentives for invention and technology transfer in universities. Centrepiece, 12(2), 2-5. https://doi.org/CEPCP231
  • Lach, Saul, Schankerman, Mark (2007). Incentives and invention in universities. London School of Economics and Political Science. Centre for Economic Performance.
  • Bloom, Nick, Schankerman, Mark, Van Reenen, John (2007). Identifying technology spillovers and product market rivalry. (NBER working paper 13060). National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Belenzon, Sharon, Schankerman, Mark (2007). Harnessing success: determinants of university technology licensing performance. Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines.
  • Noel, Michael, Schankerman, Mark (2006). Strategic patenting and software innovation. London School of Economics and Political Science. Centre for Economic Performance.
  • Belenzon, Sharon, Schankerman, Mark (2006). Harnessing success: determinants of university technology licensing performance. Centre for Economic Policy Research (Great Britain).
  • Noel, Michael, Schankerman, Mark (2006). Strategic patenting and software innovation. Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines.
  • Noel, Michael D., Schankerman, Mark (2006). Strategic patenting and software innovation. Centre for Economic Policy Research (Great Britain).
  • Bloom, Nick, Schankerman, Mark, Van Reenen, John (2005-11-18 - 2005-11-19) Identifying technology spillovers and product market rivalry [Paper]. Productivity Growth: Causes and Consequences, San Francisco, United States, USA.
  • Bloom, Nick, Schankerman, Mark, Van Reenen, John (2005). Identifying technology spillovers and product market rivalry. (CEP discussion paper 675). London School of Economics and Political Science. Centre for Economic Performance.
  • Bloom, Nick, Schankerman, Mark, Van Reenen, John (2005). Identifying technology spillovers and product market rivalry. (CEPR discussion paper 4912). Centre for Economic Policy Research (Great Britain).
  • Bloom, Nick, Schankerman, Mark, Van Reenen, John (2005). Identifying technology spillovers and product market rivalry. Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines.
  • Schankerman, Mark (2004). On the welfare effects and political economy of competition-enhancing policies. The Economic Journal, 114(498), 800-824. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2004.00244.x
  • Lanjouw, J., Schankerman, Mark (2004). Patent quality and research productivity: measuring innovation with multiple indicators. The Economic Journal, 114(495), 441-465. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2004.00216.x
  • Lanjouw, Jean O., Schankerman, Mark (2004). Protecting intellectual property rights: are small firms handicapped? Journal of Law and Economics, 47(1), 45-74.
  • Lach, Saul, Schankerman, Mark (2004). Incentives and invention in universities. Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines.
  • Saul, Lach, Schankerman, Mark (2004). Royalty sharing and technology licensing in universities. Journal of the European Economic Association, 2(2/3), 252-264.
  • Schankerman, Mark (2003). Book review: patents, citations & innovations: a window on the knowledge economy. The Economic Journal, 113(491), 653-654. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0013-0133.2003.172_1.x
  • Lach, Saul, Schankerman, Mark (2003). Incentives and invention in universities. Centre for Economic Policy Research (Great Britain).
  • Lach, Saul, Schankerman, Mark (2003). Incentives and invention in universities. National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Lanjouw, Jean O., Schankerman, Mark (2003-03-14 - 2003-03-15) Identifying technology spillovers and product market rivalry [Paper]. Empirical Economics of Innovation and Patenting, Mannheim, Germany, DEU.
  • Lanjouw, Jean O., Schankerman, Mark (2003-03-14 - 2003-03-15) Enforcing patent rights: an empirical study [Paper]. Empirical Economics of Innovation and Patenting, Mannheim, Germany, DEU.
  • Lanjouw, Jean O., Schankerman, Mark (2003). Enforcement of patent rights in the United States. In Cohen, W. M. & Merrill, S. A. (Eds.), Patents in the Knowledge-Based Economy (pp. 145-179). National Academies Press (U.S.).
  • Olson Lanjouw, Jean, Schankerman, Mark (2002). Research productivity and patent quality: measurement with multiple indicators. (STICERD Discussion Paper EI/32). Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines.
  • Schankerman, Mark, Lanjouw, Jean O. (2002). Research productivity and patent quality: measurement with multiple indicators. (CEPR Press Discussion Paper 3623). Centre for Economic Policy Research (Great Britain).
  • Schankerman, Mark (2002). Idiosyncratic and common shocks to investment decisions. The Economic Journal, 112(482), 766-785. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00070
  • Olson Lanjouw, Jean, Schankerman, Mark (2001). Enforcing intellectual property rights. Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines.
  • Olson Lanjouw, Jean, Schankerman, Mark (2001). Enforcing intellectual property rights. National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Schankerman, Mark, Lanjouw, J. (2001). Characteristics of patent litigation: a window on competition. RAND Journal of Economics, 32(1), 129-151.
  • Schankerman, Mark, Scotchmer, Suzanne (2001). Damages and injunctions in protecting intellectual property. RAND Journal of Economics, 32(1), 199-220.
  • Aghion, Philippe, Schankerman, Mark (2000). An analytical framework for evaluating transition impact of infrastructure projects. European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
  • Schankerman, Mark, Scotchmer, Suzanne (2000). Damages and injunctions in protecting proprietary research tools. Centre for Economic Policy Research (Great Britain).
  • Aghion, Philippe, Schankerman, Mark (2000). A model of market-enhancing infrastructure. Centre for Economic Policy Research (Great Britain).
  • Hellman, Joel S., Jones, Geraint, Kaufmann, Daniel, Schankerman, Mark (2000). Measuring governance, corruption, and state capture: how firms and bureaucrats shape the business environment in transition economies. World Bank.
  • Schankerman, Mark, Scotchmer, Suzanne (2000). Damages and injunctions in protecting proprietary research tools. Berkeley Electronic Press.
  • Hellman, Joel, Schankerman, Mark (2000). Intervention, corruption and capture: the nexus between enterprises and the state. Economics of Transition, 8(3), 545-799. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0351.00055
  • Lanjouw, Jean O., Schankerman, Mark (1999). The quality of ideas: measuring innovation with multiple indicators. National Bureau for Economic Research.
  • Schankerman, Mark, Scotchmer, Suzanne (1999). Damages and injunctions in the protection of proprietary research tools. National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Aghion, Philippe, Schankerman, Mark (1999). Competition, entry and the social returns to infrastructure in transition economies. Economics of Transition, 7(1), 79-101. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0351.00005
  • Aghion, Philippe, Schankerman, Mark (1999). Competition, entry, and the social returns to infrastructure in transition economies. Centre for Economic Policy Research (Great Britain).
  • Cornelli, Francesca, Schankerman, Mark (1999). Patent renewals and R&D incentives. RAND Journal of Economics, 30(2), 197-213.
  • Lanjouw, Jenny, Schankerman, Mark (1998). Patent suits: do they distort research incentives? Centre for Economic Policy Research (Great Britain).
  • Cornelli, Francesca, Schankerman, Mark (1998). Patent renewals and r&d incentives. Centre for Economic Policy Research (Great Britain).
  • Olson Lanjouw, Jean, Schankerman, Mark (1998). Stylised fact of patent litigation: value, scope and ownership. Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines.
  • Schankerman, Mark (1998). How valuable is patent protection? Estimates by technology field. RAND Journal of Economics, 29(1), 77-107.
  • Lanjouw, Jean O., Schankerman, Mark (1997). Stylized facts of patent litigation: value, scope and ownership. National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Schankerman, Mark (1997). Book review: privatizing Russia. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(2), 818-820.
  • Commander, Simon, Schankerman, Mark (1997). Enterprise restructuring and social benefits. Economics of Transition, 5(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0351.1997.tb00001.x
  • Schankerman, Mark (1997). Governance in transition. In Transition Report 1997: Enterprise Performance and Growth (pp. 48-59). European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
  • Aghion, Philippe, Schankerman, Mark (1997). Growth in transition economies: sources and obstacles. In Transition Report 1997: Enterprise Performance and Growth (pp. 48-59). European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
  • Schankerman, Mark (1996). Symmetric regulation for competitive telecommunications. Information Economics and Policy, 8(1), 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6245(95)00010-0
  • Bishop, V, Mody, A, Schankerman, Mark (1996). Exploiting new market opportunities in telecommunications. In Mody, A. (Ed.), Infrastructure Delivery: Private Initiative and the Public Good (pp. 37-78). World Bank.
  • Cornelli, Francesca, Schankerman, Mark (1996). Optimal patent renewals. Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines.
  • Schankerman, Mark (1991). Revisions and investment plans and the stock market rate of return. National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Schankerman, Mark (1991). Revisions of investment plans and the stock market rate of return. Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines.
  • Schankerman, Mark (1991). How valuable is patent protection? Estimates by technology field using patent renewal data. (CEP discussion paper 46). London School of Economics and Political Science. Centre for Economic Performance.
  • Schankerman, Mark (1991). How valuable is patent protection? Estimates by technology field using patent renewal data. National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Lach, Saul, Schankerman, Mark (1989). Dynamics of r&d and investment in the scientific sector. Journal of Political Economy, 97(4), 880-904.
  • Lach, Saul, Schankerman, Mark (1987). The interaction between capital investment and r&d in science-based firms. National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Schankerman, Mark (1987). Comment on long run trends in patents. In Griliches, Z. (Ed.), R&d, Patents and Productivity . University of Chicago Press.
  • Schankerman, Mark, Nadiri, M. Ishaq (1987). Investment in r&d, costs of adjustment and expectations. In Griliches, Z. (Ed.), R&d, Patents and Productivity (pp. 315-338). University of Chicago Press.
  • Pakes, Ariel, Schankerman, Mark (1987). An exploration into the determinants of research intensity. In Griliches, Z. (Ed.), R&d, Patents and Productivity (pp. 209-232). University of Chicago Press.
  • Pakes, Ariel, Schankerman, Mark (1987). The rate of obsolescence of patents, research gestation lags, and the private rate of return to research resources. In Griliches, Z. (Ed.), R&d, Patents and Productivity (pp. 73-88). University of Chicago Press.
  • Schankerman, Mark, Pakes, Ariel (1987). Estimates of the value of patent rights in European countries during the post-1950 period. National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Gordon, Roger H., Schankerman, Mark (1987). Estimating the effects of r&d on Bell system productivity: a model of embodied technical change. National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Schankerman, Mark, Nadiri, M. Ishaq (1987). Restricted cost functions and the rate of return to quasi-fixed factors, with an application to r&d and capital in the Bell system. National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Schankerman, Mark, Pakes, Ariel (1986). Estimates of the value of patent rights in European countries during the post-1950 period. The Economic Journal, 96(384), 1052-1076.
  • Gordon, Roger, Schankerman, Mark, Spady, Richard (1986). Estimating the effects of r&d on Bell system productivity: a model of embodied technical change. In Peston, M. H. & Quandt, R. E. (Eds.), Prices, Competition and Equilibrium (pp. 164-190). Philip Allan.
  • Schankerman, Mark, Nadiri, M. Ishaq (1986). A test of static equilibrium models and rates of return to quasi-fixed factors, with an application to the Bell system. Journal of Econometrics, 33(1-2), 97-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(86)90029-1
  • Schankerman, Mark, Pakes, Ariel (1985). Valeur et obsolescence des brevets: une analyse des statistiques de renouvellement des brevets européens. Revue Economique, (5), 917-942.
  • Schankerman, Mark, Nadiri, M. Ishaq (1982). Investment in r&d, costs of adjustment and expectations. National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Schankerman, Mark (1981). The effects of double-counting and expensing on the measured returns to r&d. Review of Economics and Statistics, 63(3), 454-459.
  • Nadiri, M. Ishaq, Schankerman, Mark (1981). Technical change, returns to scale, and the productivity slowdown. American Economic Review, 71(2), 314-319.
  • Nadiri, M. Ishaq, Schankerman, Mark (1981). The structure of production, technological change, and the rate of growth of total factor productivity in the U.S. Bell system. In Cowing, T. G. & Stevenson, R. E. (Eds.), Productivity Measurement in Regulated Industries (pp. 219-247). Academic Press.
  • Nadiri, M. Ishaq, Schankerman, Mark (1980). Variable cost functions and the rate of return to quasi-fixed factors: an application to r and d in the Bell system. National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Pakes, Ariel, Schankerman, Mark (1980). An exploration into the determinants of research intensity. National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Nadiri, M. Ishaq, Schankerman, Mark (1979). The structure of production, technological change, and the rate of growth of total factor productivity in the Bell system. National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Pakes, Ariel, Schankerman, Mark (1979). The rate of obsolescence of knowledge, research gestation lags, and the private rate of return to research resources. National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Schankerman, Mark (1976). Common costs in pharmaceutical research and development: implications for direct price regulation. In Mitchell, S. & Link, E. (Eds.), Impact of Public Policy on Drug Innovation and Pricing (pp. 3-26). American University Press Services.
  • Comanor, William S., Schankerman, Mark (1976). Identical bids and cartel behavior. Bell Journal of Economics, 7(1), 281-286.