Murkens, Jo E.

Number of items: 50.
None
  • Doyle, Oran, McHarg, Aileen, Murkens, Jo (Eds.) (2021). The Brexit challenge for Ireland and the United Kingdom: constitutions under pressure. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108966399
  • Murkens, Jo Eric Khushal (2018). The UK’s reluctant relationship with the EU: integration, equivocation, or disintegration? In Schütze, Robert, Tierney, Stephen (Eds.), United Kingdom and the federal idea . Hart Publishing.
  • Le Sueur, Andrew, Sunkin, Maurice, Murkens, Jo Eric Khushal (Eds.) (2016). Public law: text, cases and materials. Oxford University Press.
  • Masterman, Roger, Murkens, Jo Eric Khushal (2013). Skirting supremacy and subordination: the constitutional authority of the United Kingdom Supreme Court. Public Law, 2013(Oct), 800-820.
  • Le Sueur, Andrew, Sunkin, Maurice, Murkens, Jo (2013). Public law: text, cases and materials. Oxford University Press.
  • Murkens, Jo Eric Khushal (2013). From empire to union: conceptions of German constitutional law since 1871. Oxford University Press.
  • Murkens, Jo Eric Khushal (2012). The European Union Act 2011: a failed statute. Tijdschrift Voor Constitutioneel Recht, 3(4), 396-408.
  • Murkens, Jo Eric Khushal, Masterman, Roger (2012). Zwischen Vorrangstellung und Ergebenheit: Der Verfassungsstatus des Supreme Court im Vereinigten Königreich. JuristenZeitung, 21(67), 1029-1040.
  • Le Sueur, Andrew, Sunkin, Maurice, Murkens, Jo Eric Khushal (2010). Public law: text, cases and materials. Oxford University Press.
  • Murkens, Jo Eric Khushal (2010). Bundesverfassungsgericht (2 BvE 2/08): "We want our identity back" - the revival of national sovereignty in the German Federal Constitutional Court's decision on the Lisbon Treaty. Public Law, 2010, 530-550.
  • Murkens, Jo (2010). Constitutionalism. In Bevir, Mark (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Political Theory (pp. 288-295). SAGE Publications.
  • Murkens, Jo Eric Khushal (2009). Countering anti-constitutional argument: the reasons for the European Court of Justice’s decision in Kadi and Al Barakaat. Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, 11, 15-51. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1528887000001531
  • Murkens, Jo Eric Khushal (2009). Identity trumps integration: the Lisbon Treaty in the German Federal Constitutional Court. Der Staat, 48(4), 517-534. https://doi.org/10.3790/staa.48.4.517
  • Murkens, Jo Eric Khushal (2009). The quest for constitutionalism in UK public law discourse. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 29(3), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqp020
  • Murkens, Jo Eric Khushal (2008). Neither parochial nor cosmopolitan: appraising the migration of constitutional ideas. Modern Law Review, 71(2), 303-319. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2008.00694.x
  • Murkens, Jo Eric Khushal (2008). Comparative constitutional law in the courts: reflections on the originalists’ objections. Verfassung und Recht in Übersee, 41(1), 32-50.
  • Murkens, Jo Eric Khushal (2007). Book review: Herausforderungen und Antworten: Das Öffentliche Recht der letzten fünf Jahrzehnte by Rainer Wahl. Modern Law Review, 70(6), 1028-1032. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2007.00677_2.x
  • Murkens, Jo Eric Khushal (2007). The future of Staatsrecht: dominance, demise or demystification? Modern Law Review, 70(5), 731-758. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2007.00661.x
  • Murkens, Jo Eric (2003). Book review: questioning sovereignty: law, state, and nation in the European commonwealth, by N. MacCormick. Journal of Common Market Studies, 41(1), p. 171. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.t01-1-00416
  • Murkens, Jo E., Jones, Peter, Keating, Michael (2002). Scottish independence: a practical guide. Edinburgh University Press.
  • Murkens, Jo Eric (2002). The integrative function of a European constitution. German Law Journal, 3(2).
    • Public
  • Murkens, Jo Eric Khushal (2021). A written constitution: a case not made. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 41(4), 965-986. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqab016 picture_as_pdf
  • Murkens, Jo Eric Khushal (2020). Preservative or transformative? Theorizing the U.K. constitution using comparative method. American Journal of Comparative Law, 68(2), 412 - 440. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcl/avaa015 picture_as_pdf
  • Murkens, Jo Eric Khushal (2018). Judicious review: the constitutional practice of the UK Supreme Court. Cambridge Law Journal, 77(2), 349-374. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197318000326
  • Murkens, Jo Eric Khushal (2018). Democracy as the legitimating condition in the UK Constitution. Legal Studies, 38(1), 42 - 58. https://doi.org/10.1017/lst.2017.10
  • Murkens, Jo Eric Khushal (2017). Mixed messages in bottles: the European Union, devolution, and the future of the constitution. Modern Law Review, 80(4), 685-696. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12279
  • Murkens, Jo Eric Khushal (2017). Democracy as the legitimating condition in the UK constitution. (LSE Law, Society and Economy Working Papers 8/2017). Department of Law, London School of Economics and Political Science. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2971242
  • Murkens, Jo Eric Khushal (2017). LSE Law Brexit special #2: the constitutional context to triggering Article 50 TEU. (LSE Law Policy Briefing Series 21/2017). LSE Law.
  • Toubeau, Simon, Murkens, Jo Eric Khushal (2017). The Scottish and UK governments should beware the Ides of March.
  • Murkens, Jo (2017). Miller in the Supreme Court: a welcome reminder of the function of a constitution and the rule of law.
  • Murkens, Jo Eric Khushal (2017). Miller in the Supreme Court: a welcome reminder of the function of a constitution and the rule of law.
  • Murkens, Jo Eric Khushal (2017). The Supreme Court ruling explained: The government requires primary legislation before it can change the constitution.
  • Murkens, Jo Eric Khushal (2016). The High Court judgment on Article 50 is a proper drubbing for the government.
  • Murkens, Jo Eric Khushal (2016). The High Court ruling explained: an embarrassing lesson for Theresa May’s government.
  • Murkens, Jo Eric Khushal (2016). British sovereignty post-Brexit: why the Great ‘Repeal’ Act will actually weaken Parliament.
  • Murkens, Jo Eric Khushal (2016). The Great ‘Repeal’ Act will leave Parliament sidelined and disempowered.
  • Murkens, Jo Eric Khushal (2016). Brexit against the wishes of Scotland and Northern Ireland would violate the UK’s constitutional settlement.
  • Murkens, Jo Eric Khushal, Trotter, Sarah (2016). Fundamental rights and fundamental fears.
  • Murkens, Jo Eric Khushal, Toubeau, Simon (2016). Sovereignty is an illusion: the UK should use its power-sharing experience to play a constructive role in the EU.
  • Toubeau, Simon, Murkens, Jo Eric Khushal (2016). The illusion of sovereignty: the UK should embrace its experience of power-sharing at home to play a constructive role in the EU.
  • Murkens, Jo (2015). David Cameron’s tactics may take the UK out of the EU, and Scotland out of the UK.
  • Murkens, Jo Eric Khushal (2015). A referendum on Britain’s EU membership is a sure fire way to encourage the breakup of the UK.
  • Murkens, Jo Eric Khushal (2014). Unintended democracy: parliamentary reform in the UK. In Grotke, Kelly L., Prutsch, Markus J. (Eds.), Constitutionalism, Legitimacy, and Power: Nineteenth-Century Experiences (pp. 351-370). Oxford University Press.
  • Murkens, Jo, Masterman, Roger (2014). The new constitutional role of the judiciary. (LSE Law Policy Briefing Series 2). London School of Economics and Political Science.
  • Murkens, Jo Eric Khushal, Jones, Peter (2013). Alex Salmond and David Cameron’s incoherent referendum plans mean that they are unlikely to get what they want for either Scotland or the UK.
  • Murkens, Jo Eric Khushal (2013). The European Union act 2011: a failed statute. (LSE Law, Society and Economy Working Paper Series 3/2013). Department of Law, London School of Economics and Political Science.
  • Murkens, Jo Eric Khushal (2012). The UK’s European Union Act is a good example of a bad law.
  • Murkens, Jo (2012). The European Union Act is a good example of a bad law.
  • Murkens, Jo Eric Khushal (2011). An independent Scotland would need to apply for EU membership and would be compelled to adopt the euro.
  • Murkens, Jo Eric Khushal (2008). Comparative constitutional law in the courts: reflections on the originalists’ objections. (LSE law, society and economics working papers 15-2008). Department of Law, London School of Economics and Political Science.