Gaskell, George

Number of items: 79.
2025
  • Gaskell, George (19 September 2025) ChatGPT doesn't think like a human, so why does it speak like one? Impact of Social Sciences Blog. picture_as_pdf
  • Wagner, Wolfgang, Gaskell, George, Paraschou, Eva, Lyu, Siqi, Michali, Maria, Vakali, Athena (2025). Limits of ChatGPT's conversational pragmatics in a Turing test on ethics, commonsense, and cultural sensitivity. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 5, p. 100191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100191 picture_as_pdf
  • Busso, Matteo, Bontempelli, Andrea, Malcotti, Leonardo Javier, Meegahapola, Lakmal, Kun, Peter, Diwakar, Shyam, Nutakki, Chaitanya, Britez, Marcelo Dario Rodas, Xu, Hao & Song, Donglei et al (2025). DiversityOne: a multi-country smartphone sensor dataset for everyday life behavior modeling. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1145/3712289 picture_as_pdf
  • Gaskell, George, Wagner, Wolfgang, Paraschou, Eva, Lyu, Siqi, Michali, Maria, Vakali, Athina (2025). Limits of ChatGPT's Conversational Pragmatics in a Turing Test About Ethics, Commonsense, and Cultural Sensitivity. [Dataset]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14762323
    • 2024
  • Veltri, Giuseppe Alessandro, Steinert, Janina Isabel, Sternberg, Henrike, Galizzi, Matteo M, Fasolo, Barbara, Kourtidis, Ploutarchos, Büthe, Tim, Gaskell, George (2024). Assessing the perceived effect of non-pharmaceutical interventions on SARS-Cov-2 transmission risk: an experimental study in Europe. Scientific Reports, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-55447-1 picture_as_pdf
    • 2023
  • Gaskell, George, Lupiáñez-Villanueva, Francisco (6 November 2023) Is vaping a low-risk substitute for cigarettes or an emerging epidemic? British Politics and Policy at LSE. picture_as_pdf
  • Gaskell, George, Götzen, Amalia, Ganbold, Amarsanaa, Stares, Sally, Durmeier, Katharina, Bidoglia, Miriam (1 November 2023) Using AI for social benefit - WeNet and community focused social media. Impact of Social Sciences Blog. picture_as_pdf
  • Assi, Karim, Meegahapola, Lakmal, Droz, William, Kun, Peter, De Götzen, Amalia, Bidoglia, Miriam, Stares, Sally, Gaskell, George, Chagnaa, Altangerel & Ganbold, Amarsanaa et al (2023). Complex daily activities, country-level diversity, and smartphone sensing: a study in Denmark, Italy, Mongolia, Paraguay, and UK. In CHI 2023 - Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581190
  • Bogliacino, Francesco, Charris, Rafael, Codagnone, Cristiano, Folkvord, Frans, Gaskell, George, Gómez, Camilo, Liva, Giovanni, Montealegre, Felipe (2023). Less is more: information overload in the labelling of fish and aquaculture products. Food Policy, 116, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2023.102435 picture_as_pdf
  • Allum, Nick, Reid, Abigail, Bidoglia, Miriam, Gaskell, George, Aubert-Bonn, Noémie, Buljan, Ivan, Fuglsang, Simon, Horbach, Serge, Kavouras, Panagiotis & Marušić, Ana et al (2023). Researchers on research integrity: a survey of European and American researchers. F1000Research, 12, p. 187. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.128733.1 picture_as_pdf
  • Gaskell, George, Allum, Nick, Bidoglia, Miriam, Reid, Abigail-Kate (2 February 2023) Who should take responsibility for integrity in research? Impact of Social Sciences Blog. picture_as_pdf
  • Meegahapola, Lakmal, Droz, William, Kun, Peter, De Götzen, Amalia, Nutakki, Chaitanya, Diwakar, Shyam, Correa, Salvador Ruiz, Song, Donglei, Xu, Hao & Bidoglia, Miriam et al (2023). Generalization and personalization of mobile sensing-based mood inference models: an analysis of college students in eight countries. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.1145/3569483
    • 2022
  • Horbach, Serge P.J.M., Bouter, Lex M., Gaskell, George, Hiney, Maura, Kavouras, Panagiotis, Mejlgaard, Niels, Allum, Nick, Aubert Bonn, Noémie, Bendtsen, Anna Kathrine & Charitidis, Costas A. et al (2022). Designing and implementing a research integrity promotion plan: recommendations for research funders. PLoS Biology, 20(8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001773 picture_as_pdf
  • Kun, Peter, de Götzen, Amalia, Bidoglia, Miriam, Gommesen, Niels, Gaskell, George (2022). Exploring diversity perceptions in a community through a Q&A chatbot. Proceedings of DRS, https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2022.807 picture_as_pdf
    • 2020
  • Gaskell, George (16 October 2020) Nine steps to achieve research integrity and build trust. Impact of Social Sciences Blog. picture_as_pdf
  • Al-Ojayan, Hessah, Gaskell, George, Veltri, Giuseppe A. (2020). Utilising applied behavioural research to execute subsidy reform in Kuwait. (LSE Middle East Centre paper series 31). LSE Middle East Centre. picture_as_pdf
    • 2019
  • Folkvord, Frans, Veltri, Giuseppe A., Lupiáñez-Villanueva, Francisco, Tornese, Pietro, Codagnone, Cristiano, Gaskell, George (2019). The effects of ecolabels on environmentally- and health-friendly cars: an online survey and two experimental studies. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 25(5), 883-899. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-019-01644-4 picture_as_pdf
    • 2018
  • Joeris, Alexander, Knoll, Christian, Kalampoki, Vasiliki, Blumenthal, Andrea, Gaskell, George (2018). Patient-reported outcome measurements in clinical routine of trauma, spine and craniomaxillofacial surgeons: between expectations and reality: a survey among 1212 surgeons. BMJ Open, 2018(8), e020629. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020629
  • Bard, Imre, Gaskell, George, Allansdottir, Agnes, da Cunha, Rui Vieira, Eduard, Peter, Hampel, Juergen, Hildt, Elisabeth, Hofmaier, Christian, Kronberger, Nicole & Laursen, Sheena et al (2018). Bottom up ethics - neuroenhancement in education and employment. Neuroethics, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-018-9366-7
  • Bard, Imre Gaskell, George Allansdottir, Agnes, da Cunha, Rui Vieira, Eduard, Peter, Hampel, Jürgen, Hildt, Elisabeth, Hofmaier, Christian, Kronberger, Nicole & Laursen, Sheena et al (2018). Bottom up Ethics - Neuroenhancement in Education and Employment. [Dataset]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1166065
    • 2017
  • Gaskell, George Bárd, Imre Allansdottir, Agnes, Vieira da Cunha, Rui, Eduard, Peter, Hampel, Juergen, Hildt, Elisabeth, Hofmaier, Christian, Kronberger, Nicole & Laursen, Sheena et al (2017). Public views on gene editing and its uses. [Dataset]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.823633
  • Gaskell, George, Bard, Imre, Allansdottir, Agnes, da Cunha, Rui Vieira, Eduard, Peter, Hampel, Juergen, Hildt, Elisabeth, Hofmaier, Christian, Kronberger, Nicole & Laursen, Sheena et al (2017). Public views on gene editing and its uses. Nature Biotechnology, 35(11), 1021-1023. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3958
  • Gaskell, George, Hohl, Katrin, Gerber, Monica M. (2017). Do closed survey questions overestimate public perceptions of food risks? Journal of Risk Research, 20(8), 1038-1052. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2016.1147492
  • Folkvord, Frans, Lupiáñez-Villanueva, Francisco, Codagnone, Cristiano, Bogliacino, Francesco, Veltri, Giuseppe, Gaskell, George (2017). Does a ‘protective’ message reduce the impact of an advergame promoting unhealthy foods to children? an experimental study in Spain and The Netherlands. Appetite, 112, 117-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2017.01.026
  • Allum, Nick, Allansdottir, Agnes, Gaskell, George, Hampel, Jürgen, Jackson, Jonathan, Moldovan, Andreea, Priest, Susanna Hornig, Stares, Sally, Stoneman, Paul (2017). Religion and the public ethics of stem-cell research: attitudes in Europe, Canada and the United States. PLOS ONE, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176274
    • 2016
  • Codagnone, Cristiano, Veltri, Giuseppe Alessandro, Bogliacino, Francesco, Lupiáñez-Villanueva, Francisco, Gaskell, George, Ivchenko, Andriy, Ortoleva, Pietro, Mureddu, Francesco (2016). Labels as nudges? An experimental study of car eco-labels. Economia Politica, 33(3), 403-432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40888-016-0042-2
    • 2015
  • Bogliacino, Francesco, Codagnone, Cristiano, Veltri, Giuseppe Alessandro, Chakravarti, Amitav, Ortoleva, Pietro, Gaskell, George, Ivchenko, Andriy, Lupiáñez-Villanueva, Francisco, Mureddu, Francesco, Rudisill, Caroline (2015). Pathos & ethos: emotions and willingness to pay for tobacco products. PLOS ONE, 10(10), e0139542. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139542
  • Sammut, Gordon, Andreouli, Eleni, Gaskell, George, Valsiner, Jaan (Eds.) (2015). The Cambridge handbook of social representations. Cambridge University Press.
  • Lopes, Claudia Abreu, Gaskell, George (2015). Social representations and societal psychology. In Sammut, G., Andreouli, E., Gaskell, G. & Valsiner, J. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Social Representations (pp. 29-42). Cambridge University Press.
    • 2013
  • Gaskell, George, Gottweis, Herbert, Starkbaum, Johannes, Gerber, Monica M., Broerse, Jacqueline, Gottweis, Ursula, Hobbs, Abbi, Helén, Ilpo, Paschou, Maria & Snell, Karoliina et al (2013). Publics and biobanks: Pan-European diversity and the challenge of responsible innovation. European Journal of Human Genetics, 21(1), 14-20. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2012.104
    • 2012
  • Gaskell, George, Stares, Sally, Pottage, Alain (2012). How Europe's ethical divide looms over biotech law and patents. Nature Biotechnology, 30(5), 392-394. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2201
    • 2011
  • Tsirogianni, Stavroula, Gaskell, George (2011). The role of plurality and context in social values. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 41(4), 441-465. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2011.00470.x
  • Gottweis, Herbert, Gaskell, George, Starkbaum, Johannes (2011). Connecting the public with biobank research: reciprocity matters. Nature Reviews Genetics, 12(11), 738-739. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3083
  • Gaskell, George, Gottweis, Herbert (2011). Biobanks need publicity. Nature, 471(7337), 159-160. https://doi.org/10.1038/471159a
  • Gaskell, George, Allansdottir, Agnes, Allum, Nick, Castro, Paula, Esmer, Yilmaz, Fischler, Claude, Jackson, Jonathan, Kronberger, Nicole, Hampel, Jurgen & Mejlgaard, Niels et al (2011). The 2010 Eurobarometer on the life sciences. Nature Biotechnology, 29(2), 113-114. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1771
  • Bauer, Martin W., Gaskell, George (Eds.) (2011). Pesquisa qualitativa com texto, imagem e som: um manual prático. Editora Vozes.
  • Gaskell, George, Stares, Sally, Kronberger, Nicole (2011). The public’s view of science. In Bennett, D. J. & Jennings, R. C. (Eds.), Successful Science Communication: Telling It Like It Is (pp. 60-76). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511760228.007
    • 2010
  • Gaskell, George, Stares, Sally, Allansdottir, Agnes, Allum, Nick, Castro, Paula, Jackson, Jonathan (2010). Europeans and biotechnology in 2010: winds of change? Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
  • Sammut, Gordon, Gaskell, George (2010). Points of view, social positioning and intercultural relations. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 40(1), 47-64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2009.00422.x
    • 2008
  • Bauer, Martin W., Gaskell, George (2008). Social representations theory: a progressive research programme for social psychology. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 38(4), 335-353. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2008.00374.x
  • Hohl, Katrin, Gaskell, George D. (2008). European public perceptions of food risk: cross-national and methodological comparisons. Risk Analysis, 28(2), 311-324. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01021.x
  • Gaskell, George (2008). Lessons from the bio-decade: a social scientific perspective. In David, K. & Thompson, P. B. (Eds.), What Can Nanotechnology Learn From Biotechnology? (pp. 237-259). Elsevier (Firm). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012373990-2.00012-1
    • 2007
  • Gaskell, George, Jackson, Jonathan, Ten Eyck, Toby, Einsiedel, Edna, Hornig Priest, S. (2007). Transatlantic tensions over GM crops and foods: diverging perspectives. In Gaskell, G. & Bauer, M. W. (Eds.), Genomics and Society: Legal, Ethical and Social Dimensions (pp. 346-366). Earthscan Publications Ltd..
    • 2006
  • Gaskell, George, Stares, Sally, Allansdottir, Agnes, Allum, Nick, Corchero, Cristina, Jackson, Jonathan (2006). Europeans and biotechnology in 2005: patterns and trends: final report on Eurobarometer 64.3. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
  • Gaskell, George, Bauer, Martin W. (Eds.) (2006). Genomics and society: legal, ethical and social dimensions. Earthscan Publications Ltd..
  • Rothstein, Henry, Huber, Michael, Gaskell, George (2006). A theory of risk colonisation : the spiralling regulatory logics of societal and institutional risk. Economy and Society, 35(1), 91-112. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140500465865
  • Jackson, Jonathan, Allum, Nick, Gaskell, George (2006). Bridging levels of analysis in risk perception research: the case of the fear of crime. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 7(1), Art. 20.
    • 2005
  • Gaskell, George, Einsiedel, Edna, Hallman, William, Priest, Susanna Hornig, Jackson, Jonathan, Olsthoorn, Johannus (2005). Social values and the governance of science. Science, 310(5756), 1908-1909. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1119444
  • Jackson, Jonathan, Gaskell, George, Eyck, Toby Ten, Veltri, Giuseppe (2005). Imagining nanotechnology: cultural support for technological innovation in Europe and the United States. Public Understanding of Science, 14(1), 81-90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662505048949
  • Jackson, Jonathan, Allum, Nick, Gaskell, George (2005). Perceptions of risk in cyberspace. In Mansell, R. & Collins, B. S. (Eds.), Trust and Crime in Information Societies (pp. 245-281). Edward Elgar.
    • 2004
  • Gaskell, George, Ten Eyck, Toby, Jackson, Jonathan, Veltri, Giuseppe (2004). Public attitudes to nanotech in Europe and the United States. Nature Materials, 3(8), p. 496. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1181
  • Jackson, Jonathan, Allum, Nick, Gaskell, George (2004). Perceptions of risk in cyber space. (Cyber trust & crime prevention project 04/1157). Government Office for Science, Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills.
  • Gaskell, George (2004). Science policy and society: the British debate over GM agriculture. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 15(3), 241-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2004.04.008
  • Ten Eyck, Toby A., Gaskell, George, Jackson, Jonathan (2004). Seeds, food and trade wars: public opinion and policy responses in the US and Europe. Journal of Commercial Biotechnology, 10(3), 258-267. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jcb.3040081
  • Gaskell, George (2004). GM foods and the misperception of risk perception. Risk Analysis, 24(1), 183-192. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00421.x
  • Gaskell, George, Ten-Eyck, T. (Eds.) (2004). Comparative research on biotechnology and the public: report to the US-EU task force on biotechnology research. National Science Foundation (U.S.).
    • 2003
  • Gaskell, George, Allum, Nick, Bauer, Martin, Jackson, Jonathan, Howard, Susan, Lindsey, Nicola (2003). Climate change for biotechnology?: UK public opinion 1991-2002. AgBioForum, 6(1-2), 55-67.
  • Gaskell, George (2003). Seeds of discontent. Risk & Regulation, (6), p. 6.
    • 2002
  • Bauer, Martin W., Gaskell, George (Eds.) (2002). Biotechnology: the making of a global controversy. Cambridge University Press.
  • Bauer, Martin W., Gaskell, George (2002). Pesquisa qualitativa con texto, imagem e som: um manual prático. Editora Vozes.
    • 2001
  • Gaskell, George (2001). Attitudes, social representations and beyond. In Deaux, K. & Philogene, G. (Eds.), Representations of the Social: Bridging Theoretical Traditions (pp. 228-241). Blackwell Publishing Ltd..
  • Gaskell, George, Bauer, Martin W. (Eds.) (2001). Biotechnology 1996-1999 : the years of controversy. Science Museum (Great Britain). Press.
  • Gaskell, George, Bauer, Martin W. (2001). Biotechnology in the years of controversy: a social scientific perspective. In Gaskell, G. & Bauer, M. W. (Eds.), Biotechnology 1996-1999: the Years of Controversy (pp. 3-14). Science Museum (Great Britain). Press.
  • Gaskell, George (2001). Biotechnology, technoscience and the public sphere. In Gaskell, G. & Bauer, M. (Eds.), Biotechnology 1996-2000: the Years of Controversy (pp. 116-127). Science Museum (Great Britain).
  • Gaskell, George (2001). In the public eye: representations of biotechnology in Europe. In Gaskell, G. & Bauer, M. W. (Eds.), Biotechnology 1996-2000: the Years of Controversy (pp. 53-79). Science Museum (Great Britain).
  • Gaskell, George, Wagner, Wolfgang, Kronberger, Nicole (2001). Nature in disorder: the troubled public of biotechnology. In Gaskell, G. & Bauer, M. W. (Eds.), Biotechnology 1996-1999: the Years of Controversy (pp. 80-95). Science Museum (Great Britain). Press.
  • Gaskell, George, Allum, Nick (2001). Sound science, problematic publics? Contrasting representations of risk and uncertainty. Notizie di Politeia, 17(63), 13-25.
  • Gaskell, George (2001). Troubled waters: the transatlantic divide on biotechnology policy. In Gaskell, G. & Bauer, M. (Eds.), Biotechnology 1996-2000: the Years of Controversy (pp. 96-115). Science Museum (Great Britain).
  • Kronberger, Nicole, Dahinden, Urs, Allansdottir, Agnes, Seger, Nina, Pfenning, Uwe, Gaskell, George, Allum, Nick, Rusanen, Timo, Montali, Lorenzo & Wagner, Wolfgang et al (2001). "The train departed without us": public perceptions of biotechnology in ten European countries. Notizie di Politeia, 17(63), 26-36.
    • 2000
  • Bauer, Martin W., Gaskell, George, Allum, Nick, Durant, John, Allansdottir, Agnes, Bonfadelli, Heinz, Boy, Daniel, de Cheveigné, Suzanne, Fjaestad, Björn & Guttelin, Jan M. et al (2000). Biotechnology and the European public. Nature Biotechnology, 18(9), 935-938. https://doi.org/10.1038/79403
  • Bauer, Martin W., Gaskell, George (Eds.) (2000). Qualitative researching with text, image and sound: a practical handbook for social research. SAGE Publications.
  • Bauer, Martin W., Gaskell, George, Durant, John, Midden, Cees, Liakopoulous, Miltos, Scholten, Liesbeth (2000). Two cultures of public understanding of science and technology in Europe. In Dierkes, M. & von Grote, C. (Eds.), Between Understanding and Trust : the Public, Science and Technology (pp. 131-156). Routledge.
  • Gaskell, George (2000). Agricultural biotechnology and public attitudes in the European Union. AgBioForum, 3(2-3), 87-96.
  • Gaskell, George D., Wright, Daniel B., O'Muircheartaigh, Colm A. (2000). Telescoping landmark events: implications for survey research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64(1), 77-89. https://doi.org/10.1086/316761
    • 1999
  • Livingstone, Sonia, Bovill, Moira, Gaskell, George (1999). European TV kids in a transformed media world: findings of the UK study. In Löhr, P. & Meyer, M. (Eds.), Children, Television, and the New Media : a Reader of Research and Documentation in Germany (pp. 8-24). University of Luton Press.
  • Bauer, Martin W., Gaskell, George (1999). Towards a paradigm for research on social representations. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 29(2), 163-186. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5914.00096
  • Gaskell, George, Bauer, M., Allum, N. C., Durant, J. (1999). Worlds apart?: the reception of genetically modified foods in Europe and the United States. Science, 285(5426), 384-386. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.285.5426.38
    • 1996
  • Gaskell, George (1996). On the lure of metrication: attitudes and social representations. Papers on Social Representations, 5, 21-26.
    • 1994
  • Gaskell, George (1994). Survey research and consensuality: statistical and natural groups (discussion of C. Fraser). Papers on Social Representations, 3, 29-32.