Picinali, Federico

Number of items: 26.
None
  • Picinali, Federico (2022). Justice in-between: a study of intermediate criminal verdicts. Oxford University Press.
  • Holroyd, Jules, Picinali, Federico (2022). Implicit bias, self-defence and the reasonable person. In Lernestedt, Claes, Matravers, Matt (Eds.), The Criminal Law’s Person (pp. 167 - 191). Hart. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509923779.ch-009
  • Holroyd, Jules, Picinali, Federico (2021). Excluding evidence for integrity’s sake. In Dahlman, Christian, Stain, Alex, Tuzet, Giovanni (Eds.), Philosophical Foundations of Evidence Law (pp. 83 - 95). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198859307.003.0007
  • Picinali, Federico (2014). Legal reasoning as fact finding? A contribution to the analysis of criminal adjudication. Jurisprudence, 5(2), 299-327. https://doi.org/10.5235/20403313.5.2.299
  • Picinali, Federico (2013). Le narrazioni nella giustizia penale. Diritto Penale Contemporaneo,
  • Picinali, Federico (2013). Two meanings of 'reasonableness': dispelling the 'floating' reasonable doubt. Modern Law Review, 76(5), 845-875. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12038
  • Picinali, Federico (2013). La valutazione della prova. In Guadalupi, Stefano (Ed.), Commentario Al Codice di Procedura Penale . Casa Editrice La Tribuna.
  • Picinali, Federico (2012). A retributive justification for not punishing bare intentions or: on the moral relevance of the ‘now-belief’. Law and Philosophy, 32(4), 385-403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10982-012-9138-1
  • Picinali, Federico (2012). Structuring inferential reasoning in criminal fact finding: an analogical theory. Law, Probability and Risk, 11(2-3), 197-223. https://doi.org/10.1093/lpr/mgs006
  • Picinali, Federico (2012). Nascere e risiedere in Italia non basta per essere cittadino italiano. Questione Giustizia, 12(5), 153-156. https://doi.org/10.3280/QG2012-005015
  • Picinali, Federico (2011). Factual inference as analogical reasoning: a comment on Professor Tillers' 'the structure and logic of proof in trials'. Law, Probability and Risk, 10(1), 7-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/lpr/mgr001
  • Picinali, Federico (2010). Lo stato d’ebbrezza tra accertamento sintomatico e soglie di rilevanza penale. In De Francesco, Giovannangelo, Piemontese, Carmela, Venafro, Emma (Eds.), La Prova Dei Fatti Psichici . Giappichelli.
    • Public
  • Picinali, Federico, Ross, Lewis (2025). Against causal conditions. Episteme, https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2025.10079 picture_as_pdf
  • Picinali, Federico (2025). Aim or preference? Reflections on the commitment to the truth in the criminal process. Law and Philosophy, 44(1), 115 - 147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10982-024-09511-6 picture_as_pdf
  • Picinali, Federico (2025). Some critical thoughts on "How stereotypes deceive us". European Journal of Analytic Philosophy, 21(1), 39 - 55. https://doi.org/10.31820/ejap.21.1.3 picture_as_pdf
  • Picinali, Federico (2025). Epistemic injustice in the criminal trial: engaging with Gonzales Rose, Herdy, Jalloh and Ouwsu-Bempah. Quaestio Facti, 2025(8), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i8.23098 picture_as_pdf
  • Picinali, Federico (2024). Author's replies. Edinburgh Law Review, 28(2), 248 - 258. https://doi.org/10.3366/elr.2024.0899 picture_as_pdf
  • Picinali, Federico (2023). Evidential reasoning, testimonial injustice and the fairness of the criminal trial. Quaestio facti. Revista internacional sobre razonamiento probatorio, https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i6.22888 picture_as_pdf
  • Picinali, Federico (2020). The presumption of innocence: a deflationary account. Modern Law Review, https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12594 picture_as_pdf
  • Picinali, Federico (2018). Do theories of punishment necessarily deliver a binary system of verdicts? An exploratory essay. Criminal Law and Philosophy, 122(4), 555-574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-017-9440-y
  • Picinali, Federico (2018). Can the reasonable doubt standard be justified? A reconstructed dialogue. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, 31(2), 365 - 402. https://doi.org/10.1017/cjlj.2018.17
  • Picinali, Federico (2016). The denial of procedural safeguards in trials for regulatory offences: a justification. Criminal Law and Philosophy, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-016-9400-y
  • Picinali, Federico (2016). Generalisations, causal relationships, and moral responsibility. International Journal of Evidence and Proof, 20(2), 121-135. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365712716628539
  • Picinali, Federico (2015). Base-rates of negative traits: instructions for use in criminal trials. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 33(1), 69-87. https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12109
  • Picinali, Federico (2015). The threshold lies in the method: instructing jurors about reasoning beyond reasonable doubt. International Journal of Evidence and Proof, 19(3), 139-153. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365712715571511
  • Picinali, Federico (2014). Innocence and burdens of proof in English criminal law. Law, Probability and Risk, 13(3-4), 243-257. https://doi.org/10.1093/lpr/mgu007