Uher, Jana

Number of items: 35.
Psychological and Behavioural Science
  • Uher, Jana (2023). What's wrong with rating scales? Psychology's replication and confidence crisis cannot be solved without transparency in data generation. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 17(5). https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12740 picture_as_pdf
  • Uher, Jana (2022). Rating scales institutionalise a network of logical errors and conceptual problems in research practices: a rigorous analysis showing ways to tackle psychology’s crises. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1009893 picture_as_pdf
  • Uher, Jana (2022). Functions of units, scales and quantitative data: fundamental differences in numerical traceability between sciences. Quality and Quantity, 56(4), 2519 - 2548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01215-6 picture_as_pdf
  • Uher, Jana (2021). Quantitative psychology under scrutiny: measurement requires not result-dependent but traceable data generation. Personality and Individual Differences, 170, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110205 picture_as_pdf
  • Uher, Jana (2021). Psychometrics is not measurement unraveling a fundamental misconception in quantitative psychology and the complex network of its underlying fallacies. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 41(1), 58 - 84. https://doi.org/10.1037/teo0000176 picture_as_pdf
  • Uher, Jana (2020). Measurement in metrology, psychology and social sciences: data generation traceability and numerical traceability as basic methodological principles applicable across sciences. Quality and Quantity, 54(3), 975 - 1004. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-020-00970-2 picture_as_pdf
  • Uher, Jana (2018). Quantitative data from rating scales: an epistemological and methodological enquiry. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(2599). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02599 picture_as_pdf
  • Uher, Jana (2018). The transdisciplinary philosophy-of-science paradigm for research on individuals: foundations for the science of personality and individual differences. In Ziegler-Hill, V. & Shackelford, T. K. (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Personality and Individual Differences Vol. 1: The Science of Personality and Individual Differences (pp. 84-109). SAGE Publications.
  • Uher, Jana (2018). Data generation methods across the empirical sciences: differences in the study phenomena’s accessibility and the processes of data encoding. Quality and Quantity, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-018-0744-3
  • Uher, Jana (2018). Taxonomic models of individual differences: a guide to transdisciplinary approaches. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1744), p. 20170171. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0171
  • Trofimova, I., Robbins, T. W., Sulis, W. H., Uher, Jana (2018). Taxonomies of psychological individual differences: biological perspectives on millennia-long challenges. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1744), p. 20170152. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0152
  • Uher, Jana (2017). Basic definitions in personality psychology: challenges for conceptual integrations. European Journal of Personality, 31(5), 572-573. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2128
  • Uher, Jana (2016). Looking to solve the replication crisis in psychology? Limitations of questionnaire methods must be considered.
  • Uher, Jana (2016). What is “personality”?
  • Uher, Jana (2016). What is behaviour? and (when) is language behaviour? a metatheoretical definition. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 46(4), 475-501. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12104
  • Uher, Jana, Visalberghi, Elisabetta (2016). Observations versus assessments of personality: a five-method multi-species study reveals numerous biases in ratings and methodological limitations of standardised assessments. Journal of Research in Personality, 61, 61-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2016.02.003
  • Uher, Jana (2015). Interpreting “personality” taxonomies: why previous models cannot capture individual-specific experiencing, behaviour, functioning and development. Major taxonomic tasks still lay ahead. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 49(4), 600-655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-014-9281-3
  • Uher, Jana (2015). Introspection put back on its feet: new research reveals conceptual leap.
  • Uher, Jana (2015). Exploring the workings of the psyche: metatheoretical and methodological foundation. In Valsiner, J., Marsico, G., Chaudhary, N., Sato, T. & Dazzani, V. (Eds.), Psychology as the Science of Human Being: the Yokohama Manifesto (pp. 299-324). Springer International (Firm). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21094-0_18
  • Uher, Jana (2015). Conceiving “personality”: psychologist’s challenges and basic fundamentals of the Transdisciplinary Philosophy-of-Science Paradigm for Research on Individuals. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 49(3), 398-458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-014-9283-1
  • Uher, Jana (2015). Comparing individuals within and across situations, groups and species: metatheoretical and methodological foundations demonstrated in primate behaviour. In Emmans, D. & Laihinen, A. (Eds.), Comparative Neuropsychology and Brain Imaging (pp. 223-284). LIT Verlag. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3848.8169
  • Uher, Jana (2015). Developing "personality" taxonomies: metatheoretical and methodological rationales underlying selection approaches, methods of data generation and reduction principles. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 49(4), 531-589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-014-9280-4
  • Uher, Jana (2014). Fundamental challenges of contemporary “personality” research: comment on “personality from a cognitive-biological perspective” by Y. Neuman. Physics of Life Reviews, 11(4), 695-696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2014.10.005
  • Uher, Jana (2014). Agency enabled by the psyche: explorations using the Transdisciplinary Philosophy-of-Science Paradigm for Research on Individuals. In Gruber, C. W., Clark, M. G., Klempe, S. H. & Valsiner, J. (Eds.), Constraints of Agency: Explorations of Theory in Everyday Life (pp. 177-228). Springer International (Firm). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10130-9_13
  • Uher, Jana, Werner, Christina S., Gosselt, Karlijn (2013). From observations of individual behaviour to social representations of personality: developmental pathways, attribution biases, and limitations of questionnaire methods. Journal of Research in Personality, 47(5), 647-667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.03.006
  • Uher, Jana, Addessi, Elsa, Visalberghi, Elisabetta (2013). Contextualised behavioural measurements of personality differences obtained in behavioural tests and social observations in adult capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Journal of Research in Personality, 47(4), 427-444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.01.013
  • Uher, Jana (2013). Personality psychology: lexical approaches, assessment methods, and trait concepts reveal only half of the story - why it is time for a paradigm shift. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 47(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-013-9230-6
  • Uher, Jana (2011). Individual behavioral phenotypes: an integrative meta-theoretical framework. Why “behavioral syndromes” are not analogs of “personality”. Developmental Psychobiology, 53(6), 521-548. https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.20544
  • Uher, Jana (2011). Personality in nonhuman primates: what can we learn from human personality psychology? In Weiss, A., King, J. E. & Murray, L. (Eds.), Personality and Temperament in Nonhuman Primates (pp. 41-76). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0176-6_3
  • Uher, Jana (2008). Comparative personality research: methodological approaches. European Journal of Personality, 22(5), 427-455. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.680
  • Uher, Jana, Asendorpf, Jens B. (2008). Personality assessment in the Great Apes: comparing ecologically valid behavior measures, behavior ratings, and adjective ratings. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(4), 821-838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2007.10.004
  • Uher, Jana (2008). Three methodological core issues of comparative personality research. European Journal of Personality, 22(5), 475-496. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.688
  • Uher, Jana, Call, Josep (2008). How the great apes (Pan troglodytes, Pongo pygmaeus, Pan paniscus, Gorilla gorilla) perform on the reversed reward contingency task II: transfer to new quantities, long-term retention, and the impact of quantity ratios. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 122(2), 204-212. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.122.2.204
  • Uher, Jana, Asendorpf, Jens B., Call, Josep (2008). Personality in the behaviour of great apes: temporal stability, cross-situational consistency and coherence in response. Animal Behaviour, 75(1), 99-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.04.018
  • Vlamings, Petra H. J. M., Uher, Jana, Call, Josep (2006). How the great apes (Pan troglodytes, Pongo pygmaeus, Pan paniscus, and Gorilla gorilla) perform on the reversed contingency task: the effects of food quantity and food visibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 32(1), 60-70. https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.32.1.60