Jackson, Emily

Number of items: 11.
None
  • Jackson, Emily (2022). The legacy of the Warnock Report. In Dove, E. S. & Nic Shuibhne, N. (Eds.), Law and Legacy in Medical Jurisprudence: Essays in Honour of Graeme Laurie (pp. 232 - 249). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108903295.013
  • Jackson, Emily (2021). Withholding and withdrawing life-prolonging treatment and the relevance of patients’ wishes: reforming the Mental Capacity Act 2005. In White, B. P. & Willmott, L. (Eds.), International Perspectives on End-of-Life Law Reform: Politics, Persuasion and Persistence (pp. 232 - 249). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108779364.014
  • Jackson, Emily (2021). In whose interests? The prohibition of assisted suicide in the United Kingdom. In Solanke, I. (Ed.), On Crime, Society, and Responsibility in the work of Nicola Lacey (pp. 171 - 192). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198852681.003.0009
    • Public
  • Jackson, Emily (11 June 2025) The role of the public in regulating organoids and embryo models. British Politics and Policy at LSE.
  • Jackson, Emily (2025). Future challenges for UK regulation of brain organoid research. Medical Law Review, 33(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwae047 picture_as_pdf
  • Jackson, Emily (2025-06-16 - 2025-07-03) The new facts of life [Poster]. Visions for the Future: LSE Festival exhibition, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom, GBR. picture_as_pdf
  • Gallagher, Siun, Attinger, Sara, Sassano, Angie, Sutton, Elizabeth, Kerridge, Ian, Newson, Ainsley, Farsides, Bobbie, Hammarberg, Karin, Hart, Roger & Jackson, Emily et al (2024). Medicine in the marketplace: clinician and patient views on commercial influences on assisted reproductive technology. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 48(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2024.103850 picture_as_pdf
  • Cirkovic, Stevan, Wilkinson, Jack, Lensen, Sarah, Jackson, Emily, Harper, Joyce, Lindemann, Katy, Costa-Font, Joan (2023). Is the use of IVF add-on treatments driven by patients or clinics? Findings from a UK patient survey. Human Fertility, 26(2), 365 - 372. https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2023.2197628 picture_as_pdf
  • Dorison, Charles A., Lerner, Jennifer S., Heller, Blake H., Rothman, Alexander J., Kawachi, Ichiro I., Wang, Ke, Rees, Vaughan W., Gill, Brian P., Gibbs, Nancy & Ebersole, Charles R. et al (2022). In COVID-19 health messaging, loss framing increases anxiety with little-to-no concomitant benefits: experimental evidence from 84 countries. Affective Science, 3(3), 577 - 602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42761-022-00128-3 picture_as_pdf
  • Jackson, Emily (2021). Challenging the comparison in Montgomery between patients and 'consumers exercising choices'. Medical Law Review, 29(4), 595 - 612. https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwab031 picture_as_pdf
  • Naci, Huseyin, Salcher-Konrad, Maximilian, Kesselheim, Aaron S., Dr.rer.nat, Beate Wiesler, Rochaix, Lise, Redberg, Rita, Salanti, Georgia, Jackson, Emily, Garner, Sarah & Stroup, Scott et al (2020). Generating comparative evidence on new drugs and devices before approval. The Lancet, 395(10228), 986 - 997. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)33178-2 picture_as_pdf