Items where Author is "Tinkler, Jane"

Number of items: 46.
Article
  • New public management is dead. Long live digital-era governance. (2006) Dunleavy, Patrick; Margetts, Helen; Bastow, Simon; Tinkler, Jane
  • Australian e-Government in comparative perspective. Dunleavy, Patrick; Margetts, Helen; Bastow, Simon; Tinkler, Jane
    • Book
  • Digital era governance: IT corporations, the state and e-government. Dunleavy, Patrick; Margetts, Helen; Bastow, Simon; Tinkler, Jane
  • Maximizing the impacts of academic research:how to grow the recognition, influence, practical application and public understanding of science and scholarship. Dunleavy, Patrick; Tinkler, Jane
  • The impact of the social sciences:how academics and their research make a difference. Bastow, Simon; Dunleavy, Patrick; Tinkler, Jane
    • Chapter
  • Joining up citizen redress in UK central government. (2010) Dunleavy, Patrick; Bastow, Simon; Tinkler, Jane; Goldchluck, Sofia; Towers, Ed
  • Championing and governing UK public service mutuals. Tinkler, Jane
    • Conference or Workshop Item
  • Designing 'Big Society' service provision. Rainford, Paul; Tinkler, Jane
  • Designing digital public services. Rainford, Paul; Tinkler, Jane
  • Designing for nudge effects: how behaviour management can ease public sector problems. Rainford, Paul; Tinkler, Jane
  • Innovating in public sector procurement. Rainford, Paul; Tinkler, Jane
  • Integrating healthcare through design. Rainford, Paul; Tinkler, Jane
    • Report
  • Achieving innovation in central government organisations. Dunleavy, Patrick; Margetts, Helen; Bastow, Simon; Tinkler, Jane; Pearce, Oliver; Bartholomeou, Patricia
  • Citizen redress: what citizens can do if things go wrong in the public services. Dunleavy, Patrick; Loughlin, Martin; Margetts, Helen; Bastow, Simon; Tinkler, Jane; Pearce, Oliver; Bartholomeou, Patricia
  • Department for Work and Pensions: communicating with customers. Raraty, David; Dorrell, David; Dunleavy, Patrick; Goldchluk, Sofia; Khan, Mohammed Khalid; Tinkler, Jane; Towers, Ed; Margetts, Helen; Escher, Tobias; Reissfelder, Stephane; Hinds, Liane
  • Government on the internet: progress in delivering information and services online. Dunleavy, Patrick; Margetts, Helen; Bastow, Simon; Pearce, Oliver; Tinkler, Jane
  • Government on the web: about. Dunleavy, Patrick; Margetts, Helen; Escher, Tobias; Hale, Scott; Tinkler, Jane; Bastow, Simon
  • Innovating out of austerity in local government: a SWOT analysis. Dunleavy, Patrick; Rainford, Paul; Tinkler, Jane
  • The National Audit Office, the Public Accounts Committee and the risk landscape in UK public policy. Dunleavy, Patrick; Gilson, Christopher; Bastow, Simon; Tinkler, Jane
  • The impact and value of the Foresight research programme:report to Foresight from the LSE Public Policy Group. Dunleavy, Patrick; Bastow, Simon; Tinkler, Jane picture_as_pdf
  • A review of the Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) for the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers. Bastow, Simon; Dunleavy, Patrick; Pearce, Oliver; Tinkler, Jane
    • Online resource
  • Announcing the Nine Dots Prize – tackling social issues through creative thinking. Tinkler, Jane
  • BIS report on UK Research Councils: Drop in income sees fewer researchers supported but more knowledge created. Tinkler, Jane
  • Benefit fraud is already low: to save real money the government should concentrate on the errors. Tinkler, Jane
  • Book review: the Ombudsman enterprise and administrative justice. Tinkler, Jane
  • Cuts to front line policing may lead to a poorer service, but will citizens be able to navigate the convoluted police complaints systems to do anything about it? Tinkler, Jane
  • First impressions of Google Scholar Citations are good: it’s easy to use and accurate. Tinkler, Jane
  • Getting Whitehall to incorporate new IT developments in public services remains an uphill struggle: the government now lags ten years behind the private sector in its use of social media and lack of feedback to users. Tinkler, Jane
  • How radical is “radical efficiency”?: can it still be useful in a time of cuts? Tinkler, Jane; Dunleavy, Patrick
  • The Impact of Social Sciences Project by the numbers: encouraging real-time impact recording. Tinkler, Jane
  • Localism may actually reduce citizen voice because information on citizen redress is either not collected or ignored. Tinkler, Jane
  • New ‘big society’ providers could deliver better local services, but there are grave concerns surrounding funding, accountability and citizen redress. Rainford, Paul; Tinkler, Jane
  • PASC support for the creation of a single Public Services Ombudsman for England is welcome and timely. Tinkler, Jane
  • REF Advice Notes 3: What will Hefce count as ‘under-pinning’ research? Dunleavy, Patrick; Tinkler, Jane
  • Rather than narrow our definition of impact, we should use metrics to explore richness and diversity of outcomes. Tinkler, Jane
  • Reviewing 2010 in political blogging: the spotlight moves from the Tories to the Liberal Democrats. Gilson, Christopher; Tinkler, Jane
  • Slashing the welfare budget versus “we are all in this together”: the cumulative effect of cuts is more serious than has yet been admitted. Tinkler, Jane
  • Ten years after tax, social security departments in the USA and elsewhere are moving cautiously online. The UK is pioneering ‘digital by default’ services and the advent of a universal credit at DWP could be an opportunity for breakthrough progress. Tinkler, Jane
  • Think before you nudge: the benefits and pitfalls of behavioural public policy. Rainford, Paul; Tinkler, Jane
  • UK government on the internet is still costly and of ‘variable to poor’ quality. Tinkler, Jane
  • The contemporary social sciences are now converging strongly with STEM disciplines in the study of ‘human-dominated systems’ and ‘human-influenced systems’. Dunleavy, Patrick; Bastow, Simon; Tinkler, Jane
    • ['eprint_typename_blog_post' not defined]
  • Book review: The impact agenda:controversies, consequences and challenges by Katherine E. Smith, Justyna Bandola-Gill, Nasar Meer, Ellen Stewart and Richard Watermeyer. Tinkler, Jane picture_as_pdf
  • Book review:The impact agenda: controversies, consequences and challenges by Katherine E. Smith, Justyna Bandola-Gill, Nasar Meer, Ellen Stewart and Richard Watermeyer. Tinkler, Jane picture_as_pdf
  • The REF doesn’t capture what government wants from academics or how academic impact on policymaking takes place. Tinkler, Jane picture_as_pdf
  • Surviving work as an academic in the age of measuring impact. Tinkler, Jane picture_as_pdf
  • The impacts agenda is an autonomous push for opening up and democratizing academia, not part of a neo-liberal hegemony. Dunleavy, Patrick; Tinkler, Jane picture_as_pdf