Reproduction Files for 'Should We Worry About Sponsorship-Induced Bias in Online Political Science Surveys?'
This repository contains file to reproduce the results for: > Leeper, Thomas J., and Emily Thorson. "Should We Worry About Sponsorship-Induced Bias in Online Political Science Surveys?" Journal of Experimental Political Science. - `analysis.do`: the main Stata data analysis file producing all results, including tables to a subdirectory called `/tables` which must be created by the user - `analysis_coding.do`: a file called by `analysis.do` that recodes the source data file - `sponsordata.dta`: a Stata data file (.dta) containing the original data - `log.txt`: the output of running `analysis.do` in Stata 14 - `tables.zip`: a zip directory containing the separate tabular output of `analysis.do` as latex (.tex) tables - Qualtrics QSF files to reproduce all experimental conditions: - `control.qsf` - `marketingheavy.qsf` - `marketinglight.qsf` - `universityheavy.qsf` - `universitylight.qsf` - Word documents containing full questionnaires (as exported from Qualtrics) - `control.docx` - `marketingheavy.docx` - `marketinglight.docx` - `universityheavy.docx` - `universitylight.docx` To reproduce results, the `analysis.do` file needs to be run in Stata. It uses mainly commands included in Stata 14 (or lower) with the addition of the `estout` package available via ssc. (2018-11-21)
| Item Type | Dataset |
|---|---|
| Publisher | Harvard Dataverse |
| DOI | 10.7910/dvn/kkfs8y |
| Date made available | 12 February 2019 |
| Keywords | social sciences |
| Resource language | Other |
| Departments | LSE |
Explore Further
- Leeper, T. J. & Thorson, E. A. (2020). Should we worry about sponsorship-induced bias in online political science surveys? Journal of Experimental Political Science, 7(3), 209 - 217. https://doi.org/10.1017/XPS.2019.25 (Repository Output)