Replication Data for: Inequality and Violent Crime: Evidence from Data on Robbery and Violent Theft, Journal of Peace Research, 42 (1), 2005, pp. 101-112
This article argues that the link between income inequality and violent property crime might be spurious, complementing a similar argument in prior analysis by the author on the determinants of homicide. In contrast, Fajnzylber, Lederman & Loayza provide seemingly strong and robust evidence that inequality causes a higher rate of both homicide and robbery/violent theft, even after controlling for country-specific fixed effects. The results in the present article suggest that inequality is not a statistically significant determinant, unless either country-specific effects are not controlled for or the sample is artificially restricted to a small number of countries. The reason for the link between inequality and violent property crime being spurious is that income inequality is likely to be strongly correlated with country-specific fixed effects, such as cultural differences. A high degree of inequality might be socially undesirable for any number of reasons, but that it causes violent crime is far from proven.
| Item Type | Dataset |
|---|---|
| Publisher | Harvard Dataverse |
| DOI | 10.7910/dvn/6uafwa |
| Date made available | 19 April 2017 |
| Keywords | social sciences |
| Resource language | Other |
| Departments | LSE |
Explore Further
-
Neumayer, E.
(2005). Inequality and violent crime: evidence from data on robbery and violent theft. Journal of Peace Research, 42(1), 101 - 112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343305049669 (Repository Output)