Codes for: Does Biology Drive Child Penalties? Evidence from Biological and Adoptive Families
Landais, C.
, J. Kleven, H. & Egholt Søgaard, J.
(2021).
Codes for: Does Biology Drive Child Penalties? Evidence from Biological and Adoptive Families.
[Dataset]. OpenICPSR.
https://doi.org/10.3886/e120831
This paper investigates if the impact of children on the labour market outcomes of women relative to men — child penalties — can be explained by the biological links between mother and child. We estimate child penalties in biological and adoptive families using event studies around the arrival of children and almost forty years of adoption data from Denmark. Short-run child penalties are slightly larger for biological mothers than for adoptive mothers, but their long-run child penalties are virtually identical and precisely estimated. This suggests that biology is not a key driver of child-related gender gaps.
| Item Type | Dataset |
|---|---|
| Publisher | OpenICPSR |
| DOI | 10.3886/e120831 |
| Date made available | 24 May 2021 |
| Keywords | parents, Denmark, children, labor markets, adoptive parents |
| Temporal coverage |
From To 1 January 1980 31 January 2017 |
| Geographic coverage | Denmark |
| Resource language | Other |
| Departments | LSE |
Explore Further
-
Kleven, H. J., Landais, C.
& Søgaard, J. E. (2021). Does biology drive child penalties? Evidence from biological and adoptive families. American Economic Review: Insights, 3(2), 183 - 198. https://doi.org/10.1257/aeri.20200260 (Repository Output)
Downloads
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9534-680X